Mid-century net-zero emissions pathways for Japan: Potential roles of global mitigation scenarios in informing national decarbonization strategies

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy and climate change Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100128
Ken Oshiro , Shinichiro Fujimori
{"title":"Mid-century net-zero emissions pathways for Japan: Potential roles of global mitigation scenarios in informing national decarbonization strategies","authors":"Ken Oshiro ,&nbsp;Shinichiro Fujimori","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Japan has formulated a net-zero emissions target by 2050. Existing scenarios consistent with this target generally depend on carbon dioxide removal (CDR). In addition to domestic mitigation actions, the import of low-carbon energy carriers such as hydrogen and synfuels and negative emissions credits are alternative options for achieving net-zero emissions in Japan. Although the potential and costs of these actions depend on global energy system transition characteristics which can potentially be informed by the global integrated assessment models, they are not considered in current national scenario assessments. This study explores diverse options for achieving Japan's net-zero emissions target by 2050 using a national energy system model informed by international energy trade and emission credits costs estimated with a global energy system model. We found that demand-side electrification and approximately 100 Mt-CO<sub>2</sub> per year of CDR implementation, equivalent to approximately 10% of the current national CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, are essential across all net-zero emissions scenarios. Upscaling of domestically generated hydrogen-based alternative fuels and energy demand reduction can avoid further reliance on CDR. While imports of hydrogen-based energy carriers and emission credits are effective options, annual import costs exceed the current cost of fossil fuel imports. In addition, import dependency reaches approximately 50% in the scenario relying on hydrogen imports. This study highlights the importance of considering global trade when developing national net-zero emissions scenarios and describes potential new roles for global models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100128"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278724000047/pdfft?md5=3d9ee136c5782a759b6e19ae9fd065b6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666278724000047-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278724000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Japan has formulated a net-zero emissions target by 2050. Existing scenarios consistent with this target generally depend on carbon dioxide removal (CDR). In addition to domestic mitigation actions, the import of low-carbon energy carriers such as hydrogen and synfuels and negative emissions credits are alternative options for achieving net-zero emissions in Japan. Although the potential and costs of these actions depend on global energy system transition characteristics which can potentially be informed by the global integrated assessment models, they are not considered in current national scenario assessments. This study explores diverse options for achieving Japan's net-zero emissions target by 2050 using a national energy system model informed by international energy trade and emission credits costs estimated with a global energy system model. We found that demand-side electrification and approximately 100 Mt-CO2 per year of CDR implementation, equivalent to approximately 10% of the current national CO2 emissions, are essential across all net-zero emissions scenarios. Upscaling of domestically generated hydrogen-based alternative fuels and energy demand reduction can avoid further reliance on CDR. While imports of hydrogen-based energy carriers and emission credits are effective options, annual import costs exceed the current cost of fossil fuel imports. In addition, import dependency reaches approximately 50% in the scenario relying on hydrogen imports. This study highlights the importance of considering global trade when developing national net-zero emissions scenarios and describes potential new roles for global models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本本世纪中叶的净零排放途径:全球减排情景在为国家去碳化战略提供信息方面的潜在作用
日本制定了到 2050 年实现净零排放的目标。与这一目标相一致的现有方案通常取决于二氧化碳清除量(CDR)。除国内减排行动外,进口氢和合成燃料等低碳能源载体以及负排放信用额度也是日本实现净零排放的备选方案。虽然这些行动的潜力和成本取决于全球能源系统转型的特点,而全球综合评估模型可能会提供相关信息,但目前的国家情景评估并未考虑这些因素。本研究利用国家能源系统模型,并参考国际能源贸易和全球能源系统模型估算的排放额度成本,探讨了到 2050 年实现日本净零排放目标的各种方案。我们发现,在所有净零排放方案中,需求侧电气化和每年约 1 亿吨二氧化碳的 CDR 实施(相当于目前全国二氧化碳排放量的约 10%)都是必不可少的。扩大国内氢基替代燃料的生产规模和减少能源需求可以避免进一步依赖 CDR。虽然进口氢基能源载体和排放额度是有效的选择,但每年的进口成本超过了目前化石燃料的进口成本。此外,在依赖氢进口的情景中,进口依赖度达到约 50%。本研究强调了在制定国家净零排放方案时考虑全球贸易的重要性,并描述了全球模型可能发挥的新作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of decarbonisation challenges for the process industry in Sweden and Norway Green certificates for optimizing low-carbon hydrogen supply chain Cobalt-based molecular electrocatalyst-mediated green hydrogen generation: A potential pathway for decarbonising steel industry Advancing equitable value chains for the global hydrogen economy Health and air pollutant emission impacts of net zero CO2 by 2050 scenarios from the energy modeling forum 37 study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1