Hydraulic performance assessment of various submerged pile designs around an emerged dike

IF 3.7 Q1 WATER RESOURCES Water science and engineering Pub Date : 2024-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.wse.2024.02.002
{"title":"Hydraulic performance assessment of various submerged pile designs around an emerged dike","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.wse.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to devise strategies for alleviating the detrimental impacts of floods in the vicinity of a dike. Experiments were conducted in an open rectangular channel to investigate the flow dynamics under varying dike conditions. To address concerns related to intense whirls and concentrated flow around the dike head, comparative analysis was performed in terms of flow structures and energy reduction around I-shaped and T-shaped dikes with two ratios of wing length (<em>l</em><sub>w</sub>) to dike length (<em>l</em><sub>d</sub>) (<em>l</em><sub>w</sub>/<em>l</em><sub>d</sub> = 1.41 and 2.43). The T-shaped dike wings were equipped with diverse designs: angled footing, delta vane, and streamlined tapered, resulting in elevated backwater in front of the dike, reduced velocity, and enhanced energy reduction. The findings indicated that elongating the wing reciprocally affected the depth-averaged velocity (at the dike head and near the adjacent dike bank), concurrently impacting flow deflection, backwater rise, and energy reduction rate. The T-shaped dike, specifically with an angled footing (<em>l</em><sub>w</sub>/<em>l</em><sub>d</sub> = 2.43), yielded optimal outcomes. These included significant reductions in maximum energy (46%), tip velocity (98%), and dike adjacent bank velocity (90%), as well as significant flow deflection towards the mainstream, outperforming the I-shaped impermeable dike. The proposed solutions exhibit efficacy in mitigating rapid deterioration during floods, securing both the dike head and the neighboring bank to avert failures in high-energy flow.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23628,"journal":{"name":"Water science and engineering","volume":"17 4","pages":"Pages 406-416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water science and engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674237024000243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to devise strategies for alleviating the detrimental impacts of floods in the vicinity of a dike. Experiments were conducted in an open rectangular channel to investigate the flow dynamics under varying dike conditions. To address concerns related to intense whirls and concentrated flow around the dike head, comparative analysis was performed in terms of flow structures and energy reduction around I-shaped and T-shaped dikes with two ratios of wing length (lw) to dike length (ld) (lw/ld = 1.41 and 2.43). The T-shaped dike wings were equipped with diverse designs: angled footing, delta vane, and streamlined tapered, resulting in elevated backwater in front of the dike, reduced velocity, and enhanced energy reduction. The findings indicated that elongating the wing reciprocally affected the depth-averaged velocity (at the dike head and near the adjacent dike bank), concurrently impacting flow deflection, backwater rise, and energy reduction rate. The T-shaped dike, specifically with an angled footing (lw/ld = 2.43), yielded optimal outcomes. These included significant reductions in maximum energy (46%), tip velocity (98%), and dike adjacent bank velocity (90%), as well as significant flow deflection towards the mainstream, outperforming the I-shaped impermeable dike. The proposed solutions exhibit efficacy in mitigating rapid deterioration during floods, securing both the dike head and the neighboring bank to avert failures in high-energy flow.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
出露堤坝周围各种水下桩设计的水力性能评估
本研究旨在制定减轻堤坝附近洪水有害影响的策略。实验在一个开放的矩形水道中进行,以研究不同堤坝条件下的水流动力学。为了解决与堤坝头部周围的强烈漩涡和集中流有关的问题,对 I 形和 T 形堤坝周围的流动结构和能量减少情况进行了比较分析,这两种堤坝的翼长(ld)与堤坝长度(ld)之比分别为 lw/ld = 1.41 和 2.43。T 形堤翼采用了不同的设计:斜脚、三角叶片和流线型锥形,从而提高了堤前的回水位,降低了流速,增强了减能效果。研究结果表明,拉长翼片会对深度平均流速(堤坝头部和邻近堤岸附近)产生相互影响,同时对水流偏转、回水上升和能量减少率产生影响。T 形堤坝,特别是带有倾斜基脚(lw/ld = 2.43)的堤坝,产生了最佳效果。这包括最大能量(46%)、顶端流速(98%)和堤岸邻岸流速(90%)的显著降低,以及流向主流的显著偏转,优于 I 型防渗堤。所提出的解决方案可有效缓解洪水期间的快速恶化,确保堤顶和邻近堤岸的安全,避免在高能量水流中发生溃堤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
573
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: Water Science and Engineering journal is an international, peer-reviewed research publication covering new concepts, theories, methods, and techniques related to water issues. The journal aims to publish research that helps advance the theoretical and practical understanding of water resources, aquatic environment, aquatic ecology, and water engineering, with emphases placed on the innovation and applicability of science and technology in large-scale hydropower project construction, large river and lake regulation, inter-basin water transfer, hydroelectric energy development, ecological restoration, the development of new materials, and sustainable utilization of water resources.
期刊最新文献
A missing data processing method for dam deformation monitoring data using spatiotemporal clustering and support vector machine model Perspectives on risk analysis and control for real-time operation of flood control systems Microbial community diversity during algal inhibition using slow-release microcapsules of tea polyphenols Hydrological responses to permafrost degradation on Tibetan Plateau under changing climate A novel approach for quantifying upper reservoir leakage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1