Using profile analysis and ROC curves to examine the relationship between perfectionism and academic self-efficacy in secondary school students

Andrea Fuster-Rico , María Vicent , Carolina Gonzálvez , María Pérez-Marco , Lucía Granados-Alós , Raquel Suriá
{"title":"Using profile analysis and ROC curves to examine the relationship between perfectionism and academic self-efficacy in secondary school students","authors":"Andrea Fuster-Rico ,&nbsp;María Vicent ,&nbsp;Carolina Gonzálvez ,&nbsp;María Pérez-Marco ,&nbsp;Lucía Granados-Alós ,&nbsp;Raquel Suriá","doi":"10.1016/j.psicoe.2024.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study attempts to clarify the relationship between multidimensional perfectionism and academic self-efficacy in adolescents using a dual approach: variable-oriented and person-oriented. The study sample consisted of 1375 students aged 15 to 18 (<em>M</em> = 16.36, <em>SD</em> = 1.04). The <em>Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale</em> and the <em>Perceived Self-Efficacy in Academic Situations Scale</em> were used. Four perfectionist profiles were obtained from a combination of <em>socially prescribed perfectionism</em> (SPP) and <em>self-oriented perfectionism</em> (SOP) based on the <em>Latent Profile Analysis</em>: <em>very low perfectionism</em>, <em>low perfectionism</em>, <em>high perfectionism</em>, and <em>moderate perfectionism</em>. The <em>high perfectionism</em> group scored significantly higher on academic self-efficacy than the other groups. Furthermore, <em>post-hoc</em> comparisons revealed statistically significant differences in academic self-efficacy between all profiles, with moderate to large effect sizes, with the exception of the <em>very low</em> and <em>low perfectionism</em> groups. Logistic regressions demonstrated that SOP and SPP positively and significantly predicted high scores on academic self-efficacy. Upon analysis of the ROC curves, it was found that both SOP and SPP display good and similar discriminative ability, correctly classifying 79% and 76% of the participants with and without high academic self-efficacy levels, respectively. Possible explanations and implications for Educational Psychology are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101103,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)","volume":"29 2","pages":"Pages 139-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530380524000054/pdfft?md5=d5e06c4afdb735ea48b6576b5fb8c88a&pid=1-s2.0-S2530380524000054-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530380524000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study attempts to clarify the relationship between multidimensional perfectionism and academic self-efficacy in adolescents using a dual approach: variable-oriented and person-oriented. The study sample consisted of 1375 students aged 15 to 18 (M = 16.36, SD = 1.04). The Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale and the Perceived Self-Efficacy in Academic Situations Scale were used. Four perfectionist profiles were obtained from a combination of socially prescribed perfectionism (SPP) and self-oriented perfectionism (SOP) based on the Latent Profile Analysis: very low perfectionism, low perfectionism, high perfectionism, and moderate perfectionism. The high perfectionism group scored significantly higher on academic self-efficacy than the other groups. Furthermore, post-hoc comparisons revealed statistically significant differences in academic self-efficacy between all profiles, with moderate to large effect sizes, with the exception of the very low and low perfectionism groups. Logistic regressions demonstrated that SOP and SPP positively and significantly predicted high scores on academic self-efficacy. Upon analysis of the ROC curves, it was found that both SOP and SPP display good and similar discriminative ability, correctly classifying 79% and 76% of the participants with and without high academic self-efficacy levels, respectively. Possible explanations and implications for Educational Psychology are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用特征分析和ROC曲线研究中学生完美主义与学业自我效能感之间的关系
本研究采用变量导向和人本导向的双重方法,试图阐明青少年多维完美主义与学业自我效能感之间的关系。研究样本包括 1375 名 15 至 18 岁的学生(男 = 16.36,女 = 1.04)。研究使用了儿童与青少年完美主义量表和学业情境中的自我效能感量表。根据潜伏特征分析,结合社会规定完美主义(SPP)和自我导向完美主义(SOP),得出了四种完美主义特征:极低完美主义、低完美主义、高完美主义和中等完美主义。高完美主义组在学业自我效能感方面的得分明显高于其他组别。此外,事后比较显示,除极低完美主义和低完美主义组外,其他各组在学业自我效能感方面均存在统计学意义上的显著差异,效应大小为中等至较大。逻辑回归表明,SOP 和 SPP 对学业自我效能感的高分有积极和显著的预测作用。在对 ROC 曲线进行分析后发现,SOP 和 SPP 都显示出良好且相似的判别能力,分别正确地将 79% 和 76% 的具有和不具有高学业自我效能感水平的参与者进行了分类。本文讨论了可能的解释以及对教育心理学的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting the pre-service teachers’ teaching intention from educator-created (dis)empowering climates: A self-determination theory-based longitudinal approach Noticing the unnoticed: Teacher self-efficacy as a mediator between school context and teacher burnout in developing regions Using profile analysis and ROC curves to examine the relationship between perfectionism and academic self-efficacy in secondary school students Active break as a tool for improving attention in the educational context. A systematic review and meta-analysis Efficacy of a multi-risk internet prevention program: Safety.net
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1