“Let's start with the basics of the virus”: Engaging the public in two forms of explainers

IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of English for Academic Purposes Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101353
Hang (Joanna) Zou , Ken Hyland
{"title":"“Let's start with the basics of the virus”: Engaging the public in two forms of explainers","authors":"Hang (Joanna) Zou ,&nbsp;Ken Hyland","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Explainers are a relatively new genre increasingly used to provide readers with background information, disseminate specialised knowledge and enhance public outreach. These functions were particularly crucial during the Covid-19 pandemic which demanded accurate and widespread health-related information to counter considerable social media disinformation. Based on 81 academic and 81 popular explainers on the topic of Covid-19, we explore how writers employ a range of engagement features to assist them to hook and inform readers of important public health information. The results reveal considerable use of engagement features in both forms of the genre as a way of establishing interpersonal rapport with audiences to better inform them of key issues. Popular explainers contained more features overall and had higher frequencies of reader-mentions, directives and personal asides while academic explainers emphasized shared knowledge and addressed the audience with questions. These variations are explained in terms of the experiences of writers with specific persuasive forms and of the slightly different audiences. The findings are a contribution to the literature on engagement and to an understanding of communication at a time of public health crisis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158524000213","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Explainers are a relatively new genre increasingly used to provide readers with background information, disseminate specialised knowledge and enhance public outreach. These functions were particularly crucial during the Covid-19 pandemic which demanded accurate and widespread health-related information to counter considerable social media disinformation. Based on 81 academic and 81 popular explainers on the topic of Covid-19, we explore how writers employ a range of engagement features to assist them to hook and inform readers of important public health information. The results reveal considerable use of engagement features in both forms of the genre as a way of establishing interpersonal rapport with audiences to better inform them of key issues. Popular explainers contained more features overall and had higher frequencies of reader-mentions, directives and personal asides while academic explainers emphasized shared knowledge and addressed the audience with questions. These variations are explained in terms of the experiences of writers with specific persuasive forms and of the slightly different audiences. The findings are a contribution to the literature on engagement and to an understanding of communication at a time of public health crisis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"让我们从病毒的基本知识开始":用两种形式的讲解器吸引公众
解说词是一种相对较新的体裁,越来越多地用于为读者提供背景信息、传播专业知识和加强公众宣传。在 Covid-19 大流行期间,这些功能尤为重要,因为当时需要准确、广泛的健康相关信息来对抗大量的社交媒体虚假信息。我们以 Covid-19 为主题的 81 篇学术解释性文章和 81 篇通俗解释性文章为基础,探讨了作者如何利用一系列参与功能来帮助他们吸引读者并向他们提供重要的公共卫生信息。研究结果表明,在这两种形式的体裁中都大量使用了参与特征,以此来与受众建立人际关系,从而更好地向他们介绍关键问题。通俗解说词总体上包含了更多的特征,读者提及、指令和个人旁白的频率较高,而学术解说词则强调共享知识和向受众提问。这些差异可以从作者使用特定说服形式的经验和略有不同的受众角度得到解释。这些研究结果是对有关参与的文献的贡献,也有助于理解公共卫生危机时期的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of English for Academic Purposes provides a forum for the dissemination of information and views which enables practitioners of and researchers in EAP to keep current with developments in their field and to contribute to its continued updating. JEAP publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges in the linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic description of English as it occurs in the contexts of academic study and scholarly exchange itself.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board From general critical questions to scheme-relevant critical questions in the instruction on argument evaluation for EFL graduate students: A two-cycle action research Analyzing engagement strategies in argument chain: A comparison between high- and low-scoring EFL undergraduate argumentative essays Evaluating English-medium instruction in higher education: EMI-QE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1