Room for improvement in patient compliance during peripheral vascular interventions

C.Y. Maximilian Png MD , Laura T. Boitano MD , Sunita D. Srivastava MD , Abhisekh Mohapatra MD , Junaid Y. Malek MD , Jordan R. Stern MD , Matthew J. Eagleton MD , Anahita Dua MD
{"title":"Room for improvement in patient compliance during peripheral vascular interventions","authors":"C.Y. Maximilian Png MD ,&nbsp;Laura T. Boitano MD ,&nbsp;Sunita D. Srivastava MD ,&nbsp;Abhisekh Mohapatra MD ,&nbsp;Junaid Y. Malek MD ,&nbsp;Jordan R. Stern MD ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Eagleton MD ,&nbsp;Anahita Dua MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For patients receiving procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA), patient cooperation is crucial, because patients remain continuously aware of operating room activity and can be asked to perform tasks, such as prolonged breath-holds. This survey aimed to collect information on patient compliance with on-table instructions and its relation to periprocedural outcomes from surgeons nationwide performing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) under PSA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A nine-question online survey was sent to 383 vascular surgeons (including both vascular surgery attendings and trainees) across the United States through REDCap from August 30 to September 21, 2021, with responses closed on October 30, 2021. The survey response was analyzed with descriptive statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 83 (21.6%) vascular surgeons who responded to the survey, of who, 67 (80.7%) were attending vascular surgeons and 16 (19.3%) were vascular surgery trainees. Forty-one respondents (49.4%) performed 11 to 20 PVI cases under PSA every month, and 31 (41.0%) respondents performed 1 to 10 PVI cases under PSA every month. Forty-one respondents (49.4%) reported that in 1% to 10% of their cases, additional contrast and/or radiation was administered because patient moved on the table or did not cooperate with breath-holds; 25 (30.1%) reported that this occurred in 11% to 20% of their cases, 12 (14.5%) reported that this occurred in 21% to 50% of their cases, and 4 (4.8%) reported that this occurred in &gt;50% of their cases. In such cases, the majority of respondents reported a 1% to 10% increase in contrast volume (59.0%), radiation dosage (62.7%), sedative/analgesia administration (46.3%), and procedural time (54.9%). Of cases being converted to general anesthesia owing to inadequate patient cooperation, 35 (42.2%) respondents reported between 1 and 5 cases per month and 3 (3.6%) respondents reported between 6 and 10 cases per month. Of cases being aborted owing to inadequate patient cooperation, 25 respondents (30.1%) reported between 1 and 5 cases per month, and 1 (1.2%) respondent reported between 6 and 10 cases per month.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A significant fraction of PVI cases performed under PSA result in increased radiation and contrast exposure, sedative administration, and procedural time owing to inadequate patient cooperation. In certain cases, conversion to general anesthesia or case abortion is required. Further research should be performed to investigate strategies to minimize such adverse patient safety events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74034,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000072/pdfft?md5=aac0faa93dfa07efc4fd7d4525a7ffa1&pid=1-s2.0-S2949912724000072-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

For patients receiving procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA), patient cooperation is crucial, because patients remain continuously aware of operating room activity and can be asked to perform tasks, such as prolonged breath-holds. This survey aimed to collect information on patient compliance with on-table instructions and its relation to periprocedural outcomes from surgeons nationwide performing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) under PSA.

Methods

A nine-question online survey was sent to 383 vascular surgeons (including both vascular surgery attendings and trainees) across the United States through REDCap from August 30 to September 21, 2021, with responses closed on October 30, 2021. The survey response was analyzed with descriptive statistics.

Results

There were 83 (21.6%) vascular surgeons who responded to the survey, of who, 67 (80.7%) were attending vascular surgeons and 16 (19.3%) were vascular surgery trainees. Forty-one respondents (49.4%) performed 11 to 20 PVI cases under PSA every month, and 31 (41.0%) respondents performed 1 to 10 PVI cases under PSA every month. Forty-one respondents (49.4%) reported that in 1% to 10% of their cases, additional contrast and/or radiation was administered because patient moved on the table or did not cooperate with breath-holds; 25 (30.1%) reported that this occurred in 11% to 20% of their cases, 12 (14.5%) reported that this occurred in 21% to 50% of their cases, and 4 (4.8%) reported that this occurred in >50% of their cases. In such cases, the majority of respondents reported a 1% to 10% increase in contrast volume (59.0%), radiation dosage (62.7%), sedative/analgesia administration (46.3%), and procedural time (54.9%). Of cases being converted to general anesthesia owing to inadequate patient cooperation, 35 (42.2%) respondents reported between 1 and 5 cases per month and 3 (3.6%) respondents reported between 6 and 10 cases per month. Of cases being aborted owing to inadequate patient cooperation, 25 respondents (30.1%) reported between 1 and 5 cases per month, and 1 (1.2%) respondent reported between 6 and 10 cases per month.

Conclusions

A significant fraction of PVI cases performed under PSA result in increased radiation and contrast exposure, sedative administration, and procedural time owing to inadequate patient cooperation. In certain cases, conversion to general anesthesia or case abortion is required. Further research should be performed to investigate strategies to minimize such adverse patient safety events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者在外周血管介入治疗期间的依从性有待提高
背景对于接受手术镇静和镇痛(PSA)的患者而言,患者的合作至关重要,因为患者会持续感知手术室的活动,并可能被要求完成一些任务,如长时间屏气。本调查旨在向全国在 PSA 下进行外周血管介入治疗 (PVI) 的外科医生收集有关患者对台上指示的依从性及其与围手术期结果的关系的信息。方法:2021 年 8 月 30 日至 9 月 21 日,通过 REDCap 向全美 383 名血管外科医生(包括血管外科主治医师和实习生)发送了一份包含九个问题的在线调查,并于 2021 年 10 月 30 日结束回复。结果共有 83 名(21.6%)血管外科医生回复了调查,其中 67 名(80.7%)是血管外科主治医生,16 名(19.3%)是血管外科实习医生。41 名受访者(49.4%)每月在 PSA 下进行 11 至 20 例 PVI 操作,31 名受访者(41.0%)每月在 PSA 下进行 1 至 10 例 PVI 操作。41名受访者(49.4%)称,在他们的病例中,有1%到10%的病例因患者在手术台上移动或不配合屏气而需要使用额外的造影剂和/或放射线;25名受访者(30.1%)称,在他们的病例中,有11%到20%的病例出现了这种情况;12名受访者(14.5%)称,在他们的病例中,有21%到50%的病例出现了这种情况;4名受访者(4.8%)称,在他们的病例中,有50%的病例出现了这种情况。在这些病例中,大多数受访者表示造影剂用量(59.0%)、放射剂量(62.7%)、镇静剂/镇痛剂用量(46.3%)和手术时间(54.9%)增加了 1%-10%。在因患者配合度不足而转为全身麻醉的病例中,35 名受访者(42.2%)表示每月有 1 至 5 个病例,3 名受访者(3.6%)表示每月有 6 至 10 个病例。结论 在 PSA 下实施的 PVI 病例中,有相当一部分因患者合作不力而导致辐射和造影剂暴露、镇静剂用量和手术时间增加。在某些情况下,需要转为全身麻醉或病例流产。应开展进一步研究,探索将此类不良患者安全事件降至最低的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regarding “Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions: Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion from SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS” An Assessment of Racial Diversity in Vascular Surgery Educational Resources The use of artificial intelligence in three-dimensional imaging modalities and diabetic foot disease – a systematic review Room for improvement in patient compliance during peripheral vascular interventions Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1