Cognitive behavioural “third wave” therapies in the treatment of justice-involved individuals: A systematic review

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Aggression and Violent Behavior Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.avb.2024.101923
Olga Cunha , Bárbara Pereira , Marta Sousa , Andreia Castro Rodrigues
{"title":"Cognitive behavioural “third wave” therapies in the treatment of justice-involved individuals: A systematic review","authors":"Olga Cunha ,&nbsp;Bárbara Pereira ,&nbsp;Marta Sousa ,&nbsp;Andreia Castro Rodrigues","doi":"10.1016/j.avb.2024.101923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Psychological treatments have been increasingly used with justice-involved individuals; however, evidence regarding their effectiveness remains unclear. Thus, new approaches, such as Cognitive-Behavioural (CB) “third wave” therapies, have been implemented with justice-involved individuals. This systematic review describes and assesses the effectiveness of different CB “third wave” therapies, such as Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT), Mindfulness-based Approaches (MBA), Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), and Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (FAP) with justice-involved individuals. The research was conducted in four databases (i.e., B-on, PubMed, Science Direct, and PsycINFO) up to November 2023. Fifty studies were included in the review. DBT was the most assessed, followed by ACT. No studies using FAP and MCT were included. Preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of ACT, DBT, CFT, and MBA with justice-involved populations regarding aggression and violent behaviour reductions was found. However, the studies revealed some methodological shortcomings preventing us from reaching firmer conclusions. More research is needed to understand the impact of CB “third wave” therapies in forensic settings further.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51360,"journal":{"name":"Aggression and Violent Behavior","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101923"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aggression and Violent Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178924000132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychological treatments have been increasingly used with justice-involved individuals; however, evidence regarding their effectiveness remains unclear. Thus, new approaches, such as Cognitive-Behavioural (CB) “third wave” therapies, have been implemented with justice-involved individuals. This systematic review describes and assesses the effectiveness of different CB “third wave” therapies, such as Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT), Mindfulness-based Approaches (MBA), Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), and Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (FAP) with justice-involved individuals. The research was conducted in four databases (i.e., B-on, PubMed, Science Direct, and PsycINFO) up to November 2023. Fifty studies were included in the review. DBT was the most assessed, followed by ACT. No studies using FAP and MCT were included. Preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of ACT, DBT, CFT, and MBA with justice-involved populations regarding aggression and violent behaviour reductions was found. However, the studies revealed some methodological shortcomings preventing us from reaching firmer conclusions. More research is needed to understand the impact of CB “third wave” therapies in forensic settings further.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知行为 "第三波 "疗法在涉案人员治疗中的应用:系统回顾
心理治疗越来越多地用于涉案人员;然而,有关其有效性的证据仍不明确。因此,一些新的方法,如认知行为疗法(CB)"第三波 "疗法,已被用于涉法人员。本系统性综述描述并评估了不同的 CB "第三波 "疗法,如辩证行为疗法 (DBT)、接纳与承诺疗法 (ACT)、同情疗法 (CFT)、正念疗法 (MBA)、元认知疗法 (MCT) 和功能分析心理疗法 (FAP) 对涉罪人员的有效性。研究在四个数据库(即 B-on、PubMed、Science Direct 和 PsycINFO)中进行,截止日期为 2023 年 11 月。有 50 项研究被纳入审查范围。评估最多的是 DBT,其次是 ACT。未纳入使用 FAP 和 MCT 的研究。初步证据表明,ACT、DBT、CFT 和 MBA 对涉及司法程序的人群在减少攻击和暴力行为方面是有效的。不过,这些研究在方法上存在一些缺陷,使我们无法得出更可靠的结论。要进一步了解 CB "第三波 "疗法在法医环境中的影响,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Aggression and Violent Behavior, A Review Journal is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes substantive and integrative reviews, as well as summary reports of innovative ongoing clinical research programs on a wide range of topics germane to the field of aggression and violent behavior. Papers encompass a large variety of issues, populations, and domains, including homicide (serial, spree, and mass murder: sexual homicide), sexual deviance and assault (rape, serial rape, child molestation, paraphilias), child and youth violence (firesetting, gang violence, juvenile sexual offending), family violence (child physical and sexual abuse, child neglect, incest, spouse and elder abuse), genetic predispositions, and the physiological basis of aggression.
期刊最新文献
The effects of hot spots policing on violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis The management of aggression in third wave behavioral therapies: A systematic review Hate/bias crime against racial/ethnic minorities in the United States: A systematic review of empirical research and assessment of next steps Longitudinal associations between peer victimisation subtypes and children and adolescents' anxiety: A meta-analysis Methods used to link crimes using behaviour: A literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1