The biological effect of the physical energy of plasma

Yiqian Li, F. Zhao, DaWei Liu, L. Nie, Xinpei Lu
{"title":"The biological effect of the physical energy of plasma","authors":"Yiqian Li, F. Zhao, DaWei Liu, L. Nie, Xinpei Lu","doi":"10.1088/1361-6595/ad29bf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Since the publication of the initial paper on atmospheric pressure plasma sterilization by Dr. Laroussi in 1996, researchers have contributed to the field with an extensive number of papers on plasma medicine. However, these studies have primarily concentrated on the biological impacts of the chemical reactive components generated by plasma, specifically focusing on the effects of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS). Conversely, when plasma directly interacts with biological organisms, there are additional physical energies involved, such as electric fields, UV/VUV radiation, heat, etc., which may also play crucial roles in their interaction. This paper delves into this aspect by using the simplest bactericidal effect as a model for biological effects. Three dielectrics—Al2O3, quartz, and MgF2 glass—are employed to isolate the chemical active components, enabling the examination of the bactericidal effects of the electric field, UV, and VUV, respectively. The findings indicate that the plasma-induced electric field can induce irreversible electroporation, effectively eliminating bacteria at 27 kV/cm. Notably, at a plasma-induced electric field of 40 kV/cm, sterilization efficiency experiences a significant enhancement. The bactericidal effects of UV and VUV are closely linked to the choice of the plasma's working gas. Specifically, when Ar is the working gas, the bactericidal effect of UV surpasses that of using only the plasma-induced electric field by two orders of magnitude, while using He results in only a one-order increase. Despite VUV radiation being considerably weaker than UV, its bactericidal effect remains substantial. In instances where He plasma is utilized, the addition of VUV doubles the bactericidal effect. In short, this paper pioneers the exploration of the biological effects of plasma's physical energy, providing essential insights for the advancement of plasma medicine.","PeriodicalId":508056,"journal":{"name":"Plasma Sources Science and Technology","volume":"373 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plasma Sources Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/ad29bf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the publication of the initial paper on atmospheric pressure plasma sterilization by Dr. Laroussi in 1996, researchers have contributed to the field with an extensive number of papers on plasma medicine. However, these studies have primarily concentrated on the biological impacts of the chemical reactive components generated by plasma, specifically focusing on the effects of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS). Conversely, when plasma directly interacts with biological organisms, there are additional physical energies involved, such as electric fields, UV/VUV radiation, heat, etc., which may also play crucial roles in their interaction. This paper delves into this aspect by using the simplest bactericidal effect as a model for biological effects. Three dielectrics—Al2O3, quartz, and MgF2 glass—are employed to isolate the chemical active components, enabling the examination of the bactericidal effects of the electric field, UV, and VUV, respectively. The findings indicate that the plasma-induced electric field can induce irreversible electroporation, effectively eliminating bacteria at 27 kV/cm. Notably, at a plasma-induced electric field of 40 kV/cm, sterilization efficiency experiences a significant enhancement. The bactericidal effects of UV and VUV are closely linked to the choice of the plasma's working gas. Specifically, when Ar is the working gas, the bactericidal effect of UV surpasses that of using only the plasma-induced electric field by two orders of magnitude, while using He results in only a one-order increase. Despite VUV radiation being considerably weaker than UV, its bactericidal effect remains substantial. In instances where He plasma is utilized, the addition of VUV doubles the bactericidal effect. In short, this paper pioneers the exploration of the biological effects of plasma's physical energy, providing essential insights for the advancement of plasma medicine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等离子体物理能量的生物效应
自 1996 年 Laroussi 博士发表关于常压等离子体灭菌的第一篇论文以来,研究人员在等离子体医学领域发表了大量论文。不过,这些研究主要集中于等离子体产生的化学反应成分对生物的影响,特别是活性氧和氮物种(RONS)的影响。相反,当等离子体直接与生物有机体相互作用时,还会涉及额外的物理能量,如电场、紫外线/紫外辐射、热量等,这些能量也可能在它们的相互作用中发挥关键作用。本文以最简单的杀菌作用作为生物效应模型,对这方面进行了深入探讨。采用三种电介质--Al2O3、石英和 MgF2 玻璃--来分离化学活性成分,从而分别检验电场、紫外线和紫外光的杀菌效果。研究结果表明,等离子体诱导电场可诱导不可逆的电穿孔,在 27 kV/cm 的电压下可有效消灭细菌。值得注意的是,在等离子体诱导电场为 40 kV/cm 时,灭菌效率显著提高。紫外线和紫外光的杀菌效果与等离子体工作气体的选择密切相关。具体来说,当使用氩气作为工作气体时,紫外线的杀菌效果比只使用等离子体诱导电场的杀菌效果高出两个数量级,而使用氦气时则只高出一个数量级。尽管紫外线辐射比紫外线弱得多,但其杀菌效果仍然很强。在使用 He 等离子体的情况下,紫外线的加入会使杀菌效果加倍。总之,本文开创了探索等离子体物理能量生物效应的先河,为等离子体医学的发展提供了重要的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generation of high-density plasma via transparent electrode in capacitively coupled plasma Variations of plasma potential in RF discharges with DC-grounded electrode In situ measurement of electron emission yield at Si and SiO2 surfaces exposed to Ar/CF4 plasmas Study of atoms and multiply charged ions features in the nanosecond laser produced Mo plasma in vacuum using optical emission spectroscopy and time-of-flight electrostatic energy analyzer Ozone production by an He+O2 radio-frequency atmospheric pressure plasma jet driven by tailored voltage waveforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1