Comparison of the patient demographics, high resolution computed tomography(HRCT) features of the pulmonary ground-glass opacity(GGO) and its diagnostic value analysis

Sheng Fan, Xiaolei Zhu, Hui Lin, Junhai Chen, Lintao Li, Sien Shi
{"title":"Comparison of the patient demographics, high resolution computed tomography(HRCT) features of the pulmonary ground-glass opacity(GGO) and its diagnostic value analysis","authors":"Sheng Fan, Xiaolei Zhu, Hui Lin, Junhai Chen, Lintao Li, Sien Shi","doi":"10.9738/intsurg-d-23-00013.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Introduction Pulmonary ground-glass opacity (GGO) observed on computed tomography (CT) is widely regarded as a diagnostic feature of lung adenocarcinoma. However, a significant radiological predictive sign remains controversial. In this retrospective study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 206 patients with GGO to establish a correlation analysis model between CT images and diagnosis of GGO nodules.Method Histopathologic specimens were obtained from 206 patients. The clinical data, pathologic findings, and thin-section CT features of solid, pure GGO (pGGO), and mixed GGO (mGGO) nodules were compared using rigorous statistical methods, such as t-test, Fisher’s exact test, or univariate logistic regression analysis.Results Significant differences were observed among the three groups in terms of patient demographics, including gender, smoking history, and nodule size. Morphologic CT characteristics, such as the presence of spiculated sign, lobulated sign, vascule sign bubble-lucency sign, or pleural retraction, exhibited significant differences among the solid nodule, pGGO, and mGGO groups. However, no significant differences were observed in terms of air-bronchogram sign. Notably, the incidence of malignancy was significantly higher in pGGO nodules (76.52%) than in solid (48.48%) and mGGO (73.86%) nodules. Patients with mGGO had up to 2.988 times higher hazard of malignant lesions than those with solid nodules (p=0.036). Similarly, the hazard of malignant lesions was 2.941 times higher in patients with pGGO than in those with solid nodules (p=0.007).Conclusion Based on our comprehensive analysis, patients presenting with a mGGO or pGGO on CT scans were more likely to be diagnosed with lung cancer.","PeriodicalId":509627,"journal":{"name":"International Surgery","volume":"184 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-23-00013.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Pulmonary ground-glass opacity (GGO) observed on computed tomography (CT) is widely regarded as a diagnostic feature of lung adenocarcinoma. However, a significant radiological predictive sign remains controversial. In this retrospective study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 206 patients with GGO to establish a correlation analysis model between CT images and diagnosis of GGO nodules.Method Histopathologic specimens were obtained from 206 patients. The clinical data, pathologic findings, and thin-section CT features of solid, pure GGO (pGGO), and mixed GGO (mGGO) nodules were compared using rigorous statistical methods, such as t-test, Fisher’s exact test, or univariate logistic regression analysis.Results Significant differences were observed among the three groups in terms of patient demographics, including gender, smoking history, and nodule size. Morphologic CT characteristics, such as the presence of spiculated sign, lobulated sign, vascule sign bubble-lucency sign, or pleural retraction, exhibited significant differences among the solid nodule, pGGO, and mGGO groups. However, no significant differences were observed in terms of air-bronchogram sign. Notably, the incidence of malignancy was significantly higher in pGGO nodules (76.52%) than in solid (48.48%) and mGGO (73.86%) nodules. Patients with mGGO had up to 2.988 times higher hazard of malignant lesions than those with solid nodules (p=0.036). Similarly, the hazard of malignant lesions was 2.941 times higher in patients with pGGO than in those with solid nodules (p=0.007).Conclusion Based on our comprehensive analysis, patients presenting with a mGGO or pGGO on CT scans were more likely to be diagnosed with lung cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较患者人口统计学特征、肺磨玻璃混浊的高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)特征及其诊断价值分析
导言 计算机断层扫描(CT)上观察到的肺磨玻璃不透明(GGO)被广泛认为是肺腺癌的诊断特征。然而,这一重要的放射学预测征象仍存在争议。在这项回顾性研究中,我们对 206 例 GGO 患者进行了全面分析,以建立 CT 图像与 GGO 结节诊断之间的相关性分析模型。采用严格的统计学方法,如 t 检验、费雪精确检验或单变量逻辑回归分析,比较实性结节、纯 GGO(pGGO)结节和混合 GGO(mGGO)结节的临床数据、病理结果和薄层 CT 特征。CT形态学特征,如是否存在棘突征、分叶征、血管征、气泡-透明征或胸膜回缩,在实性结节组、pGGO 组和 mGGO 组之间存在显著差异。但是,在气压支气管图征方面没有观察到明显差异。值得注意的是,pGGO结节中恶性肿瘤的发生率(76.52%)明显高于实性结节(48.48%)和mGGO结节(73.86%)。mGGO患者的恶性病变风险是实性结节患者的2.988倍(P=0.036)。结论 根据我们的综合分析,在 CT 扫描中出现 mGGO 或 pGGO 的患者被诊断为肺癌的可能性更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alveolar echinococcosis of the liver with initially suspected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: case report - the significance of preoperative serological diagnostics Risk factors, susceptibility vessel sign and thrombosis pathology for prognosis inpatients with different subtypes of acute ischemic stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy Consideration of the process of lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer with squamous cell differentiation Comparison of the patient demographics, high resolution computed tomography(HRCT) features of the pulmonary ground-glass opacity(GGO) and its diagnostic value analysis Comparison of the patient demographics, high resolution computed tomography(HRCT) features of the pulmonary ground-glass opacity(GGO) and its diagnostic value analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1