Hydrologically driven modulation of cutoff regime in meandering rivers

Geology Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1130/g51783.1
Riccardo Maitan, A. Finotello, D. Tognin, A. D’Alpaos, Christopher R. Fielding, A. Ielpi, M. Ghinassi
{"title":"Hydrologically driven modulation of cutoff regime in meandering rivers","authors":"Riccardo Maitan, A. Finotello, D. Tognin, A. D’Alpaos, Christopher R. Fielding, A. Ielpi, M. Ghinassi","doi":"10.1130/g51783.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bend cutoff is a fundamental process shaping meandering rivers. Despite the widely accepted differentiation between neck and chute cutoffs, a significant knowledge gap persists regarding the factors responsible for the occurrence of each cutoff regime and the specific conditions triggering the regime. Here, we used field and photogrammetric data derived from a global set of 22 meandering rivers, stretching more than 5500 km in total river length, to disentangle the controlling factors behind the cutoff regime in meandering rivers. We found that whether a meandering river forms a chute rather than neck meander cutoff depends primarily on the variability of overbank discharges. Short-lived, high-magnitude overbank floods promote the formation of chute cutoffs, aided by (though not required) reduced riparian vegetation density, enhanced stream power, and flow confinement within the river valley. In contrast, neck cutoffs are prevalent in rivers characterized by limited variations in bankfull hydrology, typically associated with low-magnitude, long-lasting overbank floods. Distinct cutoff regimes also discernibly affected floodplain geomorphology, with a chute regime resulting in more frequent cutoff occurrences. Our results suggest that human-induced alterations of river hydrologic regime can potentially cause fundamental shifts in the cutoff behavior of meandering rivers, thus affecting sediment residence time and carbon fluxes in alluvial floodplains.","PeriodicalId":503125,"journal":{"name":"Geology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/g51783.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bend cutoff is a fundamental process shaping meandering rivers. Despite the widely accepted differentiation between neck and chute cutoffs, a significant knowledge gap persists regarding the factors responsible for the occurrence of each cutoff regime and the specific conditions triggering the regime. Here, we used field and photogrammetric data derived from a global set of 22 meandering rivers, stretching more than 5500 km in total river length, to disentangle the controlling factors behind the cutoff regime in meandering rivers. We found that whether a meandering river forms a chute rather than neck meander cutoff depends primarily on the variability of overbank discharges. Short-lived, high-magnitude overbank floods promote the formation of chute cutoffs, aided by (though not required) reduced riparian vegetation density, enhanced stream power, and flow confinement within the river valley. In contrast, neck cutoffs are prevalent in rivers characterized by limited variations in bankfull hydrology, typically associated with low-magnitude, long-lasting overbank floods. Distinct cutoff regimes also discernibly affected floodplain geomorphology, with a chute regime resulting in more frequent cutoff occurrences. Our results suggest that human-induced alterations of river hydrologic regime can potentially cause fundamental shifts in the cutoff behavior of meandering rivers, thus affecting sediment residence time and carbon fluxes in alluvial floodplains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水文驱动的蜿蜒河流断流机制调节
弯道截流是形成蜿蜒河流的基本过程。尽管人们普遍认为颈部截流和滑道截流是不同的,但对于每种截流机制的发生因素以及触发该机制的具体条件,仍然存在很大的知识差距。在此,我们利用来自全球 22 条蜿蜒河流(河流总长度超过 5500 公里)的实地数据和摄影测量数据,对蜿蜒河流断流机制背后的控制因素进行了分析。我们发现,一条蜿蜒的河流是否会形成滑道而不是颈状蜿蜒断流,主要取决于过岸排水量的变化。由于河岸植被密度降低、河水动力增强以及河谷内水流受限(尽管并非必须),短时、高水位的过岸洪水会促进河道断流的形成。与此相反,颈状断流在河岸水文变化有限的河流中非常普遍,通常与低强度、持续时间长的决堤洪水有关。不同的截流机制也对洪泛区地貌产生了明显的影响,滑道机制导致截流发生得更为频繁。我们的研究结果表明,人类对河流水文系统的改变可能会导致蜿蜒河流的截流行为发生根本性转变,从而影响冲积洪泛区的泥沙停留时间和碳通量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Globally significant mass of terrestrial organic carbon efficiently transported by canyon-flushing turbidity currents Generation of Archean TTGs via sluggish subduction Early Mississippian global δ13C excursion is not a diagenetic artifact Fingerprinting enhanced floodplain reworking during the Paleocene−Eocene Thermal Maximum in the Southern Pyrenees (Spain): Implications for channel dynamics and carbon burial Late Oligocene−Miocene evolution of deep-water circulation in the abyssal South China Sea: Insights from Nd isotopes of fossil fish teeth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1