Not afraid of the big bad wolf: calls from large predators do not silence mesopredators

IF 1.7 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY Wildlife Biology Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1002/wlb3.01226
H. Root-Gutteridge, Bethany R. Smith, Arik Kershenbaum, Hannah Butkiewicz, Amy C. Fontaine, Jessica Owens, Loretta Schindler, Angela Dassow
{"title":"Not afraid of the big bad wolf: calls from large predators do not silence mesopredators","authors":"H. Root-Gutteridge, Bethany R. Smith, Arik Kershenbaum, Hannah Butkiewicz, Amy C. Fontaine, Jessica Owens, Loretta Schindler, Angela Dassow","doi":"10.1002/wlb3.01226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large predators are known to shape the behavior and ecology of sympatric predators via conflict and competition, with mesopredators thought to avoid large predators, while dogs suppress predator activity and act as guardians of human property. However, interspecific communication between predators has not been well‐explored and this assumption of avoidance may oversimplify the responses of the species involved. We explored the acoustic activity of three closely related sympatric canids: wolves Canis lupus, coyotes Canis latrans, and dogs Canis familiaris. These species have an unbalanced triangle of risk: coyotes, as mesopredators, are at risk from both apex‐predator wolves and human‐associated dogs, while wolves fear dogs, and dogs may fear wolves as apex predators or challenge them as intruders into human‐allied spaces. We predicted that risk perception would dictate vocal response with wolves and dogs silencing coyotes as well as dogs silencing wolves. Dogs, in their protective role of guarding human property, would respond to both. Eleven passive acoustic monitoring devices were deployed across 13 nights in central Wisconsin, and we measured the responses of each species to naturally occurring heterospecific vocalizations. Against our expectation, silencing did not occur. Instead, coyotes were not silenced by either species: when hearing wolves, coyotes responded at greater than chance rates and when hearing dogs, coyotes did not produce fewer calls than chance rates. Similarly, wolves responded at above chance rates to coyotes and at chance rates when hearing dogs. Only the dogs followed our prediction and responded at above chance rates in response to both coyotes and wolves. Thus, instead of silencing their competitors, canid vocalizations elicit responses from them suggesting the existence of a complex heterospecific communication network.","PeriodicalId":54405,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large predators are known to shape the behavior and ecology of sympatric predators via conflict and competition, with mesopredators thought to avoid large predators, while dogs suppress predator activity and act as guardians of human property. However, interspecific communication between predators has not been well‐explored and this assumption of avoidance may oversimplify the responses of the species involved. We explored the acoustic activity of three closely related sympatric canids: wolves Canis lupus, coyotes Canis latrans, and dogs Canis familiaris. These species have an unbalanced triangle of risk: coyotes, as mesopredators, are at risk from both apex‐predator wolves and human‐associated dogs, while wolves fear dogs, and dogs may fear wolves as apex predators or challenge them as intruders into human‐allied spaces. We predicted that risk perception would dictate vocal response with wolves and dogs silencing coyotes as well as dogs silencing wolves. Dogs, in their protective role of guarding human property, would respond to both. Eleven passive acoustic monitoring devices were deployed across 13 nights in central Wisconsin, and we measured the responses of each species to naturally occurring heterospecific vocalizations. Against our expectation, silencing did not occur. Instead, coyotes were not silenced by either species: when hearing wolves, coyotes responded at greater than chance rates and when hearing dogs, coyotes did not produce fewer calls than chance rates. Similarly, wolves responded at above chance rates to coyotes and at chance rates when hearing dogs. Only the dogs followed our prediction and responded at above chance rates in response to both coyotes and wolves. Thus, instead of silencing their competitors, canid vocalizations elicit responses from them suggesting the existence of a complex heterospecific communication network.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不怕大灰狼:大型食肉动物的叫声并不能让中型食肉动物闭嘴
众所周知,大型捕食者会通过冲突和竞争影响同域捕食者的行为和生态,中型捕食者被认为会避开大型捕食者,而狗则会抑制捕食者的活动,并充当人类财产的守护者。然而,捕食者之间的种间交流还没有得到很好的研究,这种回避的假设可能会过度简化相关物种的反应。我们研究了三种密切相关的同域犬科动物的声学活动:狼(Canis lupus)、郊狼(Canis latrans)和狗(Canis familiaris)。这些物种的风险三角并不平衡:郊狼作为中间捕食者,面临着来自顶级捕食者狼和与人类相关的狗的风险,而狼惧怕狗,狗可能惧怕作为顶级捕食者的狼,也可能挑战作为入侵者进入与人类相关空间的狼。我们预测,对风险的感知将决定声音反应,狼和狗会让郊狼闭嘴,狗也会让狼闭嘴。狗在保护人类财产时,会对两者都做出反应。我们在威斯康星州中部的 13 个夜晚部署了 11 个被动声学监测装置,并测量了每个物种对自然发生的异种发声的反应。与我们的预期相反,沉默并没有发生。相反,郊狼并没有被任何一个物种压制:当听到狼的叫声时,郊狼的回应率高于偶然率;当听到狗的叫声时,郊狼发出的叫声并没有少于偶然率。同样,狼对郊狼的回应率高于偶然率,而听到狗的回应率也高于偶然率。只有狗遵循了我们的预测,对郊狼和狼的回应率都高于偶然率。因此,犬科动物的发声不但不会使其竞争对手沉默,反而会引起他们的反应,这表明存在一个复杂的异种交流网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wildlife Biology
Wildlife Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: WILDLIFE BIOLOGY is a high-quality scientific forum directing concise and up-to-date information to scientists, administrators, wildlife managers and conservationists. The journal encourages and welcomes original papers, short communications and reviews written in English from throughout the world. The journal accepts theoretical, empirical, and practical articles of high standard from all areas of wildlife science with the primary task of creating the scientific basis for the enhancement of wildlife management practices. Our concept of ''wildlife'' mainly includes mammal and bird species, but studies on other species or phenomena relevant to wildlife management are also of great interest. We adopt a broad concept of wildlife management, including all structures and actions with the purpose of conservation, sustainable use, and/or control of wildlife and its habitats, in order to safeguard sustainable relationships between wildlife and other human interests.
期刊最新文献
Red deer grazing pressure on agricultural grass meadows from broad to local scale Wolf diet in the Notecka Forest, western Poland Where is the wolf? A multi‐method comparison of social values and perceptions in a Swiss park The effects of variability in catch effort on the precision of statistical population reconstruction Reaching and implementing the best available knowledge in wildlife biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1