A phylogenetic perspective on ecological specialisation reveals hummingbird and insect pollinators have generalist diets

IF 3.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Oikos Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1111/oik.10208
M. Maglianesi, I. Varassin, Gerardo Ávalos, L. Jorge
{"title":"A phylogenetic perspective on ecological specialisation reveals hummingbird and insect pollinators have generalist diets","authors":"M. Maglianesi, I. Varassin, Gerardo Ávalos, L. Jorge","doi":"10.1111/oik.10208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Specialisation in food resource use is a crucial process that fosters species coexistence in plant–animal networks, contributing to the maintenance of biodiversity, ecological complexity, and community stability. Notably, although there is a vast literature on ecological specialisation in pollination systems, the evolutionary similarity among the plant species visited by particular pollinators has been largely ignored. Here, we apply a robust phylogenetic approach to analyse whether the evolutionary relatedness of plant species is a significant factor in mediating pollinator visits and how it relates to the morphology of interacting species. We quantified ecological and clade specialisation of hummingbird and insect species in three mutualistic networks from the Costa Rican highlands and associated these metrics with species traits. We found that hummingbirds were overall ecologically more specialised than insects (i.e. visited a less diverse set of plant species). However, when evaluating the phylogenetic relatedness among the visited plant species, all hummingbird species and most insects had overdispersed diets, which indicates they visited phylogenetically distant plant species in the community. Moreover, a great proportion of these clade generalists visited plant species with a great variation in corolla length, showing a lack of preference for this morphological trait. Altogether, our results demonstrate that by incorporating plant phylogeny to network analysis, pollinator species were generalists and that corolla length weakly influences plant–pollinator interactions in the three studied networks. A phylogenetic perspective should occupy a central role in the study of specialisation since it contributes to understanding the interplay between ecological and evolutionary processes in mutualistic networks. Future research should focus on evaluating whether the phylogenetic structure of animal diets mediates patterns of interactions in different types of mutualisms and environmental contexts, linking these patterns to other floral traits. This knowledge may be valuable for deepening our comprehension of the underlying mechanisms shaping ecological networks.","PeriodicalId":19496,"journal":{"name":"Oikos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oikos","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.10208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Specialisation in food resource use is a crucial process that fosters species coexistence in plant–animal networks, contributing to the maintenance of biodiversity, ecological complexity, and community stability. Notably, although there is a vast literature on ecological specialisation in pollination systems, the evolutionary similarity among the plant species visited by particular pollinators has been largely ignored. Here, we apply a robust phylogenetic approach to analyse whether the evolutionary relatedness of plant species is a significant factor in mediating pollinator visits and how it relates to the morphology of interacting species. We quantified ecological and clade specialisation of hummingbird and insect species in three mutualistic networks from the Costa Rican highlands and associated these metrics with species traits. We found that hummingbirds were overall ecologically more specialised than insects (i.e. visited a less diverse set of plant species). However, when evaluating the phylogenetic relatedness among the visited plant species, all hummingbird species and most insects had overdispersed diets, which indicates they visited phylogenetically distant plant species in the community. Moreover, a great proportion of these clade generalists visited plant species with a great variation in corolla length, showing a lack of preference for this morphological trait. Altogether, our results demonstrate that by incorporating plant phylogeny to network analysis, pollinator species were generalists and that corolla length weakly influences plant–pollinator interactions in the three studied networks. A phylogenetic perspective should occupy a central role in the study of specialisation since it contributes to understanding the interplay between ecological and evolutionary processes in mutualistic networks. Future research should focus on evaluating whether the phylogenetic structure of animal diets mediates patterns of interactions in different types of mutualisms and environmental contexts, linking these patterns to other floral traits. This knowledge may be valuable for deepening our comprehension of the underlying mechanisms shaping ecological networks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从系统发育的角度看生态特化,蜂鸟和昆虫授粉者都是通食动物
食物资源利用的专业化是植物-动物网络中促进物种共存的关键过程,有助于维持生物多样性、生态复杂性和群落稳定性。值得注意的是,尽管有大量文献研究授粉系统中的生态专业化,但特定授粉昆虫所访问的植物物种之间的进化相似性却在很大程度上被忽视了。在此,我们采用稳健的系统发生学方法来分析植物物种之间的进化相关性是否是授粉昆虫访问的重要中介因素,以及它与相互作用物种的形态之间的关系。我们对哥斯达黎加高原三个互生网络中蜂鸟和昆虫物种的生态和支系特化进行了量化,并将这些指标与物种特征联系起来。我们发现,蜂鸟的生态特化程度总体上高于昆虫(即访问的植物物种种类较少)。然而,在对所访问植物物种之间的系统发育相关性进行评估时,所有蜂鸟物种和大多数昆虫的食物过于分散,这表明它们访问了群落中系统发育较远的植物物种。此外,这些支系中的大部分通性鸟类都会访问花冠长度差异较大的植物物种,这表明它们对这一形态特征缺乏偏好。总之,我们的研究结果表明,通过将植物系统发育纳入网络分析,传粉昆虫物种是通才,在所研究的三个网络中,花冠长度对植物与传粉昆虫之间的相互作用影响微弱。系统发生学视角应在特化研究中占据核心地位,因为它有助于理解互惠网络中生态和进化过程之间的相互作用。未来的研究应侧重于评估动物食谱的系统发育结构是否在不同类型的互惠关系和环境背景下介导了互动模式,并将这些模式与其他花卉特征联系起来。这些知识对于加深我们对塑造生态网络的基本机制的理解可能很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oikos
Oikos 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
152
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Oikos publishes original and innovative research on all aspects of ecology, defined as organism-environment interactions at various spatiotemporal scales, so including macroecology and evolutionary ecology. Emphasis is on theoretical and empirical work aimed at generalization and synthesis across taxa, systems and ecological disciplines. Papers can contribute to new developments in ecology by reporting novel theory or critical empirical results, and "synthesis" can include developing new theory, tests of general hypotheses, or bringing together established or emerging areas of ecology. Confirming or extending the established literature, by for example showing results that are novel for a new taxon, or purely applied research, is given low priority.
期刊最新文献
Linking fine‐root diameter across root orders with climatic, biological and edaphic factors in the Northern Hemisphere Do plants respond to multi‐year disturbance rhythms and are we missing the beat? Importance of accounting for imperfect detection of plants in the estimation of population growth rates Landscape structures and stand attributes jointly regulate forest productivity Evolutionary cycles in a model of nestmate recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1