Dorm-preneurship as Entrepreneurial Living and Learning: An Educational Design Ethnography

Ryan T. MacNeil, Santana Ochoa Briggs, Alisha E. Christie, Connor Sheehan
{"title":"Dorm-preneurship as Entrepreneurial Living and Learning: An Educational Design Ethnography","authors":"Ryan T. MacNeil, Santana Ochoa Briggs, Alisha E. Christie, Connor Sheehan","doi":"10.1177/25151274241232356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entrepreneurship residence halls/dorms have been appearing on more and more campuses, especially in the United States and Canada. However, there is a very thin knowledge base on which to construct and design these expensive campus facilities/programs. Sometimes called “dormcubators,” these facilities/programs are linked to both the university business incubation (UBI) and living-learning communities (LLC) movements. As a result, the design and delivery of these hybrid spaces/programs can be oriented toward achieving economic (i.e., starting companies), social (i.e., building communities), and/or educational (i.e., entrepreneurial learning) outcomes. Prior research on other kinds of post-secondary LLCs suggests that the intended outcomes are also likely accompanied by unintended negative consequences for students and faculty. To understand how various dorm-preneurship program designs have worked in practice, this paper applies an ‘educational design ethnography’ approach to four different residential entrepreneurship programs at the University of Waterloo, Canada. The key finding is that problems arise when dorm-preneurship programs lack any link to educational/curricular outcomes and focus only on economic objectives or social ones. Four design principles are developed to guide research and development of similar programs in other contexts.","PeriodicalId":435934,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy","volume":"424 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151274241232356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Entrepreneurship residence halls/dorms have been appearing on more and more campuses, especially in the United States and Canada. However, there is a very thin knowledge base on which to construct and design these expensive campus facilities/programs. Sometimes called “dormcubators,” these facilities/programs are linked to both the university business incubation (UBI) and living-learning communities (LLC) movements. As a result, the design and delivery of these hybrid spaces/programs can be oriented toward achieving economic (i.e., starting companies), social (i.e., building communities), and/or educational (i.e., entrepreneurial learning) outcomes. Prior research on other kinds of post-secondary LLCs suggests that the intended outcomes are also likely accompanied by unintended negative consequences for students and faculty. To understand how various dorm-preneurship program designs have worked in practice, this paper applies an ‘educational design ethnography’ approach to four different residential entrepreneurship programs at the University of Waterloo, Canada. The key finding is that problems arise when dorm-preneurship programs lack any link to educational/curricular outcomes and focus only on economic objectives or social ones. Four design principles are developed to guide research and development of similar programs in other contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为创业生活和学习的宿舍创业:教育设计民族志
越来越多的校园,尤其是美国和加拿大的校园,出现了创业宿舍。然而,建造和设计这些昂贵的校园设施/项目的知识基础非常薄弱。这些设施/项目有时被称为 "宿舍孵化器",与大学企业孵化(UBI)和生活学习社区(LLC)运动都有联系。因此,这些混合空间/项目的设计和实施可以以实现经济(即创办公司)、社会(即建设社区)和/或教育(即创业学习)成果为导向。先前对其他类型的中学后有限责任公司的研究表明,预期成果也可能会给学生和教师带来意想不到的负面影响。为了了解各种宿舍创业计划设计在实践中是如何运作的,本文采用 "教育设计民族志 "的方法,对加拿大滑铁卢大学的四个不同的住宿创业计划进行了研究。主要发现是,如果宿舍创业计划与教育/课程成果缺乏联系,只关注经济目标或社会目标,就会出现问题。该研究提出了四项设计原则,以指导其他环境下类似项目的研究和开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning to Be “Me,” “the Team,” and “the Company” Through Entrepreneurial Extracurricular Activities: An Ethnographic Approach Artificial Intelligence as a Dynamic Copilot in Entrepreneurship Education Entrepreneurial Mindset and Intentions for Entrepreneurship and Intrapreneurship in Engineering and Business Students Modes of Being: Astonishment and openness in Entrepreneurship Education Innovative Extracurricular Student Engagement: The Community Problem Solving Challenge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1