Experimental Comparative Analysis of the Through-Thickness and In-Plane Compression Moduli of Unidirectional CFRP Laminates

R. Bogenfeld
{"title":"Experimental Comparative Analysis of the Through-Thickness and In-Plane Compression Moduli of Unidirectional CFRP Laminates","authors":"R. Bogenfeld","doi":"10.3390/jcs8020076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the experimental characterization of the through-thickness compression properties in unidirectional laminates using cube compression tests. Cubical specimens, each with an edge length of 10, were symmetrically outfitted with biaxial strain gauges and subjected to a compression test. While similar methodologies exist in the literature, this work primarily addresses the potential biases inherent in the testing procedure and their mitigation. The influence of friction-induced non-uniform deformation behavior is compensated through a scaling of the stiffness measurements using finite element (FE) analysis results. This scaling significantly enhances the accuracy of the resulting parameters of the experiments. The ultimate failure of the specimens, originating from stress concentrations at the edges, resulted in fracture angles ranging between 60∘ and 67∘. Such fracture patterns, consistent with findings from other researchers, are attributed to shear stress induced by friction at the load introduction faces. The key findings of this research are the comparisons between the through-thickness modulus (E33c) and strength (X33c) and their in-plane counterparts (E22c and X22c). The results indicate deteriorations of E33c and X33c from E22c and X22c by margins of 5 and 7, respectively. Furthermore, the results for E22c and X22c were compared with the results obtained through a standard test, revealing a 12 enhancement in strength X22c and 4 underestimated stiffness E22c in the cube compression test.","PeriodicalId":502935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Composites Science","volume":"60 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Composites Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8020076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the experimental characterization of the through-thickness compression properties in unidirectional laminates using cube compression tests. Cubical specimens, each with an edge length of 10, were symmetrically outfitted with biaxial strain gauges and subjected to a compression test. While similar methodologies exist in the literature, this work primarily addresses the potential biases inherent in the testing procedure and their mitigation. The influence of friction-induced non-uniform deformation behavior is compensated through a scaling of the stiffness measurements using finite element (FE) analysis results. This scaling significantly enhances the accuracy of the resulting parameters of the experiments. The ultimate failure of the specimens, originating from stress concentrations at the edges, resulted in fracture angles ranging between 60∘ and 67∘. Such fracture patterns, consistent with findings from other researchers, are attributed to shear stress induced by friction at the load introduction faces. The key findings of this research are the comparisons between the through-thickness modulus (E33c) and strength (X33c) and their in-plane counterparts (E22c and X22c). The results indicate deteriorations of E33c and X33c from E22c and X22c by margins of 5 and 7, respectively. Furthermore, the results for E22c and X22c were compared with the results obtained through a standard test, revealing a 12 enhancement in strength X22c and 4 underestimated stiffness E22c in the cube compression test.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单向 CFRP 层压材料厚度和平面内压缩模量的实验对比分析
本研究利用立方体压缩试验探索了单向层压板通厚压缩特性的实验表征。每个边长为 10 的立方体试样都对称地安装了双轴应变片,并进行了压缩试验。虽然文献中也有类似的方法,但这项工作主要是解决测试程序中固有的潜在偏差及其缓解问题。通过使用有限元(FE)分析结果对刚度测量进行缩放,补偿了摩擦引起的非均匀变形行为的影响。这种缩放大大提高了实验结果参数的准确性。试样的最终破坏源于边缘的应力集中,断裂角度在 60∘ 和 67∘ 之间。这种断裂模式与其他研究人员的发现一致,都是由于载荷引入面的摩擦引起的剪应力造成的。这项研究的主要发现是通过厚度模量(E33c)和强度(X33c)与平面内模量(E22c 和 X22c)之间的比较。结果表明,E33c 和 X33c 与 E22c 和 X22c 相比,分别退化了 5 倍和 7 倍。此外,将 E22c 和 X22c 的结果与通过标准试验获得的结果进行了比较,发现在立方体压缩试验中,强度 X22c 提高了 12 倍,刚度 E22c 低估了 4 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of the Incorporation of Olive Tree Pruning Sawdust in the Production of Lightweight Mortars Properties of Composites Based on Polylactide Filled with Cork Filler Influence of Silica Nanoparticles on the Physical Properties of Random Polypropylene Analytical and Experimental Behaviour of GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Columns under Fire Loading Mechanical Characterization of Hybrid Steel Wire Mesh/Basalt/Epoxy Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Laminates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1