A Systematic Review of Variables Used in Physical Therapist Education Program Admissions Part 2: Noncognitive Variables

Andrea N. Bowens
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Variables Used in Physical Therapist Education Program Admissions Part 2: Noncognitive Variables","authors":"Andrea N. Bowens","doi":"10.1097/jte.0000000000000329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Physical therapist (PT) education professionals agree on promoting holistic admissions practices to increase student body diversity but lack consensus about what factors in an application should be part of this process. This systematic literature review aimed to understand the value of noncognitive variables in PT education admissions.\n \n \n \n The initial literature search identified 1,592 articles in databases and relevant journals. Of the 39 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, 29 reported on noncognitive variables.\n \n \n \n Commonly used noncognitive variables (interviews, written essays, letters of recommendation, and clinical experiences) were insignificant or inconsistently associated with performance in the PT program or on the National Physical Therapy Examination. Sociodemographic variables appeared to negatively affect the academic qualifications of applicants who were older, identified with underrepresented racial/ethnic groups, and reported English as a second language. Finally, 5 studies identified personal attributes, such as emotional intelligence and grit, as having a significant relationship with successful student outcomes.\n \n \n \n Cognitive variables should serve as only one of several factors considered in admissions to achieve a more diverse class of students. Physical therapist education programs may use this evidence to reevaluate their admissions practices to include a balanced consideration of cognitive and noncognitive variables.\n","PeriodicalId":506460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Therapy Education","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Therapy Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jte.0000000000000329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical therapist (PT) education professionals agree on promoting holistic admissions practices to increase student body diversity but lack consensus about what factors in an application should be part of this process. This systematic literature review aimed to understand the value of noncognitive variables in PT education admissions. The initial literature search identified 1,592 articles in databases and relevant journals. Of the 39 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, 29 reported on noncognitive variables. Commonly used noncognitive variables (interviews, written essays, letters of recommendation, and clinical experiences) were insignificant or inconsistently associated with performance in the PT program or on the National Physical Therapy Examination. Sociodemographic variables appeared to negatively affect the academic qualifications of applicants who were older, identified with underrepresented racial/ethnic groups, and reported English as a second language. Finally, 5 studies identified personal attributes, such as emotional intelligence and grit, as having a significant relationship with successful student outcomes. Cognitive variables should serve as only one of several factors considered in admissions to achieve a more diverse class of students. Physical therapist education programs may use this evidence to reevaluate their admissions practices to include a balanced consideration of cognitive and noncognitive variables.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理治疗师教育课程招生变量的系统回顾 第二部分:非认知变量
物理治疗师(PT)教育专业人士一致认为,应促进整体招生实践,以增加学生群体的多样性,但对于申请中哪些因素应成为这一过程的一部分却缺乏共识。本系统性文献综述旨在了解非认知变量在物理治疗师教育招生中的价值。 最初的文献检索在数据库和相关期刊中发现了 1,592 篇文章。在符合纳入标准的 39 项研究中,有 29 项报告了非认知变量。 常用的非认知变量(面试、书面论文、推荐信和临床经验)与PT课程或全国物理治疗考试成绩的相关性不明显或不一致。社会人口变量似乎对年龄较大、属于代表性不足的种族/民族群体以及英语为第二语言的申请者的学术资格有负面影响。最后,有 5 项研究指出,情商和勇气等个人特质与学生的成功结果有重要关系。 认知变量应该只是招生时考虑的几个因素之一,目的是让学生更加多元化。理疗师教育项目可利用这些证据重新评估其招生实践,以平衡考虑认知和非认知变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Roadmap to Cultivating a Culture of Belonging for Learners in Physical Therapy Education Fundamentals of Competency-Based Education in Physical Therapy Addressing Race and Culture During Clinical Education Experiences A New Chapter: MEDLINE Acceptance and Introducing JoPTE EduGraphics A Systematic Review of Variables Used in Physical Therapist Education Program Admissions Part 2: Noncognitive Variables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1