The Influence of Hydroxyapatite, Titanium, and Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Oxide on Diversity of Bacterial Cultures Grown from Human Dental Biofilm Specimens in an In Vitro Model

{"title":"The Influence of Hydroxyapatite, Titanium, and Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Oxide on Diversity of Bacterial Cultures Grown from Human Dental Biofilm Specimens in an In Vitro Model","authors":"","doi":"10.54289/jdoe2400103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Titanium (TI) and yttria stabilized-zirconia oxide (YSZ) are dental materials commonly utilized at the soft-tissue interface surrounding dental implants. The influence of these surfaces on bacterial adhesion and biofilm development may affect clinical performance and patient susceptibility to inflammatory peri-implant disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the substrate material on biofilm diversity. Methods: Biofilms were cultured on TI, YSZ, and hydroxyapatite (HA) surfaces (control) using plaque specimens obtained from three human donors. Duplicate cultures grew for one, two, three, six or nine days. Biofilm diversity was then analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing. The Shannon Diversity Index (SDI) was calculated for each experimental group. Microbial profiles were intercompared in a pairwise fashion to establish dissimilarity scores, which were recorded in a distance dissimilarity matrix. Results: A total of 16 taxa were identified, and relative abundances of the predominant phyla and genera did not appear statistically different across experimental groups. Biofilms grown on HA surfaces exhibited significantly higher alpha diversity compared with those formed on TI or YSZ (p<0.0001), although biofilms cultured on TI and YSG surfaces exhibited comparable diversity. Statistically significant differences in beta diversity associated with substrate (p=0.012) and growth period (p=0.001) were detected. Conclusions: Under the conditions described, biofilms grown on TI or YSZ appeared significantly less complex than those formed on HA. Transmucosal implant abutment surface characteristics represent one modifiable factor potentially influencing risk of peri-implant disease. Among risk of peri-implant disease. Among multiple considerations in abutment design, biofilm diversity performance may represent a clinically relevant benchmark.","PeriodicalId":73703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":"63 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54289/jdoe2400103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Titanium (TI) and yttria stabilized-zirconia oxide (YSZ) are dental materials commonly utilized at the soft-tissue interface surrounding dental implants. The influence of these surfaces on bacterial adhesion and biofilm development may affect clinical performance and patient susceptibility to inflammatory peri-implant disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the substrate material on biofilm diversity. Methods: Biofilms were cultured on TI, YSZ, and hydroxyapatite (HA) surfaces (control) using plaque specimens obtained from three human donors. Duplicate cultures grew for one, two, three, six or nine days. Biofilm diversity was then analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing. The Shannon Diversity Index (SDI) was calculated for each experimental group. Microbial profiles were intercompared in a pairwise fashion to establish dissimilarity scores, which were recorded in a distance dissimilarity matrix. Results: A total of 16 taxa were identified, and relative abundances of the predominant phyla and genera did not appear statistically different across experimental groups. Biofilms grown on HA surfaces exhibited significantly higher alpha diversity compared with those formed on TI or YSZ (p<0.0001), although biofilms cultured on TI and YSG surfaces exhibited comparable diversity. Statistically significant differences in beta diversity associated with substrate (p=0.012) and growth period (p=0.001) were detected. Conclusions: Under the conditions described, biofilms grown on TI or YSZ appeared significantly less complex than those formed on HA. Transmucosal implant abutment surface characteristics represent one modifiable factor potentially influencing risk of peri-implant disease. Among risk of peri-implant disease. Among multiple considerations in abutment design, biofilm diversity performance may represent a clinically relevant benchmark.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外模型中羟基磷灰石、钛和钇稳定氧化锆对从人牙生物膜标本中培养的细菌多样性的影响
背景:钛(TI)和钇稳定氧化锆(YSZ)是牙科种植体周围软组织界面常用的牙科材料。这些表面对细菌粘附和生物膜发展的影响可能会影响临床表现和患者对种植体周围炎症性疾病的易感性。本研究旨在评估基底材料对生物膜多样性的影响。方法:使用从三位人体捐献者处获得的斑块标本,在TI、YSZ和羟基磷灰石(HA)表面(对照)上培养生物膜。重复培养物分别生长一、二、三、六或九天。然后使用 16S rRNA 测序分析生物膜的多样性。计算每个实验组的香农多样性指数(SDI)。以成对方式相互比较微生物概况,以确定差异分数,并将其记录在距离差异矩阵中。结果共鉴定出 16 个类群,各实验组主要门类和属的相对丰度没有统计学差异。与在 TI 或 YSZ 表面上形成的生物膜相比,生长在 HA 表面上的生物膜显示出明显更高的α多样性(p<0.0001),尽管在 TI 和 YSG 表面上培养的生物膜显示出相当的多样性。贝塔多样性与基质(p=0.012)和生长期(p=0.001)的差异具有统计学意义。结论在所述条件下,生长在 TI 或 YSZ 上的生物膜的复杂性明显低于在 HA 上形成的生物膜。经粘膜种植体基台表面特征是潜在影响种植体周围疾病风险的一个可改变因素。在种植体周围疾病的风险中在基台设计的多个考虑因素中,生物膜多样性的表现可能是与临床相关的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Workflow for Interdisciplinary Communication in Crown Lengthening Surgery A Novel Technique Using Extracted Primary Maxillary Canines in an Essix Retainer Split/Dual Tray Impression Technique with a Digital Workflow Soldier Preference in Mandibular Advancement Devices in Patients Who Brux Endodontic Competence of the New General Dentist as Conceptualized by Predoctoral Educators: A Qualitative Exploration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1