Endodontic Competence of the New General Dentist as Conceptualized by Predoctoral Educators: A Qualitative Exploration

{"title":"Endodontic Competence of the New General Dentist as Conceptualized by Predoctoral Educators: A Qualitative Exploration","authors":"","doi":"10.54289/jdoe2400109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Without a unified standard for what constitutes endodontic competence for the new general dentist, predoctoral endodontic directors (PEDs) are left with the great responsibility of educating their learners in a manner that they believe best serves patients. Given different influencing factors and varying amounts of resources, these PEDs must ensure the achievement of meaningful objectives utilizing conceptual frameworks of competence. It is essential for dental educators and other stakeholders to gain an understanding of what current endodontic competence means to enable more accurate needs assessments to advise future curriculum development. The purpose of this study was to explore how endodontic competence for the new general dentist is conceptualized by predoctoral endodontics directors and their respective institutions while identifying perceived facilitators and barriers to its achievement. Methods: Following the development of a semi-structured interview guide and its piloting, qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 PEDs. Interviews were transcribed and coded. The constant comparative method was utilized for data analysis. Results: Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Conceptualization of endodontic competency seemed to be informed by three primary themes: the existing paradigmatic approaches of PEDs and their institutions, their concerns regarding validity evidence especially as it related to assessment, and the presence of institutional and logistical barriers. Conclusion: Despite differences between their institutional definition and personal conceptualization of endodontic competence, PEDs report success at graduating new general dentists competent in endodontic diagnosis, case difficulty assessment, palliative treatment, and routine non-surgical root canal therapy on single-canal teeth of minimal difficulty.","PeriodicalId":73703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":"36 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54289/jdoe2400109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Without a unified standard for what constitutes endodontic competence for the new general dentist, predoctoral endodontic directors (PEDs) are left with the great responsibility of educating their learners in a manner that they believe best serves patients. Given different influencing factors and varying amounts of resources, these PEDs must ensure the achievement of meaningful objectives utilizing conceptual frameworks of competence. It is essential for dental educators and other stakeholders to gain an understanding of what current endodontic competence means to enable more accurate needs assessments to advise future curriculum development. The purpose of this study was to explore how endodontic competence for the new general dentist is conceptualized by predoctoral endodontics directors and their respective institutions while identifying perceived facilitators and barriers to its achievement. Methods: Following the development of a semi-structured interview guide and its piloting, qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 PEDs. Interviews were transcribed and coded. The constant comparative method was utilized for data analysis. Results: Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Conceptualization of endodontic competency seemed to be informed by three primary themes: the existing paradigmatic approaches of PEDs and their institutions, their concerns regarding validity evidence especially as it related to assessment, and the presence of institutional and logistical barriers. Conclusion: Despite differences between their institutional definition and personal conceptualization of endodontic competence, PEDs report success at graduating new general dentists competent in endodontic diagnosis, case difficulty assessment, palliative treatment, and routine non-surgical root canal therapy on single-canal teeth of minimal difficulty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
博士预备教育者所理解的新普通牙科医生的牙髓治疗能力:定性探索
引言:如果没有一个统一的标准来确定新的普通牙科医生的牙髓治疗能力,那么牙髓学博士前期指导(PEDs)就肩负着以他们认为最有利于患者的方式教育学习者的重大责任。鉴于不同的影响因素和不同数量的资源,这些 PED 必须确保利用能力概念框架实现有意义的目标。对于牙科教育者和其他利益相关者来说,了解当前牙髓病学能力的含义至关重要,这样才能进行更准确的需求评估,为未来的课程开发提供建议。本研究的目的是探讨牙体牙髓病学博士前期课程主任及其各自机构是如何将新普通牙科医生的牙体牙髓病学能力概念化的,同时确定实现这一目标的促进因素和障碍。研究方法:在制定半结构化访谈指南并进行试点后,对 10 名牙体牙髓病学博士进行了定性访谈。对访谈内容进行了誊写和编码。数据分析采用恒定比较法。结果:访谈进行到主题饱和为止。牙髓治疗能力的概念化似乎受到以下三个主要主题的影响:PEDs 及其机构现有的范式方法、他们对有效性证据(尤其是与评估相关的有效性证据)的担忧以及机构和后勤障碍的存在。结论:尽管机构对牙体牙髓治疗能力的定义和个人对牙体牙髓治疗能力的概念之间存在差异,但牙科专业教育机构报告称,他们成功地培养出了能够胜任牙体牙髓诊断、病例难度评估、姑息治疗以及对难度极低的单管牙进行常规非手术根管治疗的新普通牙科医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Workflow for Interdisciplinary Communication in Crown Lengthening Surgery A Novel Technique Using Extracted Primary Maxillary Canines in an Essix Retainer Split/Dual Tray Impression Technique with a Digital Workflow Soldier Preference in Mandibular Advancement Devices in Patients Who Brux Endodontic Competence of the New General Dentist as Conceptualized by Predoctoral Educators: A Qualitative Exploration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1