Management Practices and Implementation Challenges in District Education Directorates in Ghana

Minahil Asim, Sheena Bell, Michael Boakye-Yiadom, H. Nudzor, Karen Mundy
{"title":"Management Practices and Implementation Challenges in District Education Directorates in Ghana","authors":"Minahil Asim, Sheena Bell, Michael Boakye-Yiadom, H. Nudzor, Karen Mundy","doi":"10.1177/0013161x241230527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Subnational actors and organizations are crucial mediators of policy implementation due to their proximity to schools. However, in low- and middle-income country contexts, little is known about their management practices and factors that shape the adoption of these practices to improve education delivery. Purpose: We explore the management context of five District Education Directorates in Ghana, and the factors that enable or constrain them to plan and implement policy. Participants: Forty-three interviews and focus groups with regional and district education officials, district political actors, and basic education school headteachers and teachers. Research Design: A qualitative study of semistructured interviews, focus groups, and education policy and planning documents. Analysis: To understand how policy implementation happens within complex, multitiered bureaucracies, our theoretical framework uses four management functions described in Williams et al. (2021) to explore two different paradigms of how to change public bureaucracies: target setting and prioritization; measurement and monitoring; accountability and incentives; and problem-solving. We coded and analyzed our data based on this framework and developed district-wide narrative memos to synthesize the findings. Findings: We identify three areas of (mis)alignment in management practices: across bureaucratic levels and among actors; around clear and consistent priorities for learning; in expected actions and availability of resources. These (mis)alignments can constrain or be leveraged by districts to improve education delivery in Ghana. Implications: We argue for better prioritization of goals toward learning and the efficient allocation of funds for management practices typical of effective organizations.","PeriodicalId":503827,"journal":{"name":"Educational Administration Quarterly","volume":"46 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Administration Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x241230527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Subnational actors and organizations are crucial mediators of policy implementation due to their proximity to schools. However, in low- and middle-income country contexts, little is known about their management practices and factors that shape the adoption of these practices to improve education delivery. Purpose: We explore the management context of five District Education Directorates in Ghana, and the factors that enable or constrain them to plan and implement policy. Participants: Forty-three interviews and focus groups with regional and district education officials, district political actors, and basic education school headteachers and teachers. Research Design: A qualitative study of semistructured interviews, focus groups, and education policy and planning documents. Analysis: To understand how policy implementation happens within complex, multitiered bureaucracies, our theoretical framework uses four management functions described in Williams et al. (2021) to explore two different paradigms of how to change public bureaucracies: target setting and prioritization; measurement and monitoring; accountability and incentives; and problem-solving. We coded and analyzed our data based on this framework and developed district-wide narrative memos to synthesize the findings. Findings: We identify three areas of (mis)alignment in management practices: across bureaucratic levels and among actors; around clear and consistent priorities for learning; in expected actions and availability of resources. These (mis)alignments can constrain or be leveraged by districts to improve education delivery in Ghana. Implications: We argue for better prioritization of goals toward learning and the efficient allocation of funds for management practices typical of effective organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳地区教育局的管理做法和实施挑战
背景:国家以下一级的行为者和组织由于接近学校而成为政策实施的重要中介。然而,在中低收入国家,人们对他们的管理实践以及影响采用这些实践来改善教育交付的因素知之甚少。目的:我们探讨了加纳五个地区教育局的管理情况,以及促使或制约他们规划和实施政策的因素。参与人员:与地区和县教育官员、县政治人物、基础教育学校校长和教师进行了 43 次访谈和焦点小组讨论。研究设计:对半结构式访谈、焦点小组以及教育政策和规划文件进行定性研究。分析:为了了解政策是如何在复杂、多层次的官僚机构中实施的,我们的理论框架采用了 Williams 等人(2021 年)所描述的四种管理功能,以探讨如何改变公共官僚机构的两种不同范式:目标设定和优先顺序;衡量和监控;问责制和激励机制;以及解决问题。我们根据这一框架对数据进行了编码和分析,并在全区范围内编写了叙述性备忘录,以综合研究结果。研究结果:我们发现在管理实践中存在三个(不)一致的方面:跨官僚层级和参与者之间的不一致;围绕明确一致的学习优先事项的不一致;预期行动和资源可用性方面的不一致。这些(错误)协调既可以制约也可以被各地区利用,以改善加纳的教育交付。影响:我们认为,应更好地确定学习目标的优先次序,并为有效组织的典型管理做法有效分配资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
All Dressed Up With No Place to Go? National Board Certification and Teacher Leadership Novice School Leaders’ Turnover Intentions: The Role of Working Conditions and Organizational Factors Management Practices and Implementation Challenges in District Education Directorates in Ghana Management Practices and Implementation Challenges in District Education Directorates in Ghana Reviewers List
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1