ECG-based Prediction of Conduction Disturbances after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with Convolutional Neural Network

Yuheng Jia, Yiming Li, Gaden Luosang, Jianyong Wang, Gang Peng, Xingzhou Pu, Weili Jiang, Wenjian Li, Zhengang Zhao, Yong Peng, Yuan Feng, Jiafu Wei, Yuanning Xu, Xingbin Liu, Zhang Yi, Mao Chen
{"title":"ECG-based Prediction of Conduction Disturbances after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with Convolutional Neural Network","authors":"Yuheng Jia, Yiming Li, Gaden Luosang, Jianyong Wang, Gang Peng, Xingzhou Pu, Weili Jiang, Wenjian Li, Zhengang Zhao, Yong Peng, Yuan Feng, Jiafu Wei, Yuanning Xu, Xingbin Liu, Zhang Yi, Mao Chen","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Permanent pacemaker implantation and left bundle branch block are common complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and are associated with impaired prognosis.\n \n \n \n This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for predicting conduction disturbances after TAVR using preprocedural 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) data.\n \n \n \n We collected preprocedural 12-lead ECGs of patients who underwent TAVR at West China Hospital between March 2016 and March 2022. A hold-out testing set comprising 20% of the sample was randomly selected. We developed an AI model using a convolutional neural network, trained it using fivefold cross validation, and tested it on the hold-out testing cohort. We also developed and validated an enhanced model that included additional clinical features.\n \n \n \n After applying exclusion criteria, we included 1354 ECGs of 718 patients in the study. The AI model predicted conduction disturbances in the hold-out testing cohort with an AUC of 0.764, accuracy of 0.743, F1 score of 0.752, sensitivity of 0.876, and specificity of 0.624, based solely on pre-procedural ECG data. The performance was better than the Emory score (AUC = 0.704), as well as the Logistic (AUC = 0.574) and XGboost (AUC = 0.520) models built with previously identified high-risk ECG patterns. After adding clinical features, there was an increase in the overall performance with an AUC of 0.779, accuracy of 0.774, F1 score of 0.776, sensitivity of 0.794, and specificity of 0.752.\n \n \n \n AI-enhanced ECGs may offer better predictive value than traditionally defined high-risk ECG patterns.\n","PeriodicalId":508387,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","volume":"82 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Permanent pacemaker implantation and left bundle branch block are common complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and are associated with impaired prognosis. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for predicting conduction disturbances after TAVR using preprocedural 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) data. We collected preprocedural 12-lead ECGs of patients who underwent TAVR at West China Hospital between March 2016 and March 2022. A hold-out testing set comprising 20% of the sample was randomly selected. We developed an AI model using a convolutional neural network, trained it using fivefold cross validation, and tested it on the hold-out testing cohort. We also developed and validated an enhanced model that included additional clinical features. After applying exclusion criteria, we included 1354 ECGs of 718 patients in the study. The AI model predicted conduction disturbances in the hold-out testing cohort with an AUC of 0.764, accuracy of 0.743, F1 score of 0.752, sensitivity of 0.876, and specificity of 0.624, based solely on pre-procedural ECG data. The performance was better than the Emory score (AUC = 0.704), as well as the Logistic (AUC = 0.574) and XGboost (AUC = 0.520) models built with previously identified high-risk ECG patterns. After adding clinical features, there was an increase in the overall performance with an AUC of 0.779, accuracy of 0.774, F1 score of 0.776, sensitivity of 0.794, and specificity of 0.752. AI-enhanced ECGs may offer better predictive value than traditionally defined high-risk ECG patterns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于心电图的卷积神经网络预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的传导障碍
永久起搏器植入和左束支传导阻滞是经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后常见的并发症,与预后不良有关。 本研究旨在利用术前 12 导联心电图(ECG)数据开发一种人工智能(AI)模型,用于预测 TAVR 术后的传导障碍。 我们收集了2016年3月至2022年3月期间在华西医院接受TAVR的患者的术前12导联心电图。我们随机选取了占样本 20% 的暂缓测试集。我们使用卷积神经网络开发了一个人工智能模型,使用五倍交叉验证对其进行了训练,并在暂缓测试组中进行了测试。我们还开发并验证了一个包含更多临床特征的增强模型。 在应用排除标准后,我们将 718 名患者的 1354 张心电图纳入了研究。仅根据手术前的心电图数据,人工智能模型预测出了暂停测试队列中的传导障碍,AUC 为 0.764,准确率为 0.743,F1 得分为 0.752,灵敏度为 0.876,特异性为 0.624。其性能优于埃默里评分(AUC = 0.704),也优于利用先前确定的高风险心电图模式建立的 Logistic 模型(AUC = 0.574)和 XGboost 模型(AUC = 0.520)。添加临床特征后,总体性能有所提高,AUC 为 0.779,准确率为 0.774,F1 得分为 0.776,灵敏度为 0.794,特异性为 0.752。 与传统定义的高风险心电图模式相比,人工智能增强型心电图可能具有更好的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting early-stage coronary artery disease using machine learning and routine clinical biomarkers improved by augmented virtual data Why Thorough Open Data Descriptions Matters More Than Ever in the Age of AI: Opportunities for Cardiovascular Research Meet Key Digital Health thought leaders: Jagmeet (Jag) Singh Machine learning-based prediction of 1-year all-cause mortality in patients undergoing CRT implantation: Validation of the SEMMELWEIS-CRT score in the European CRT Survey I dataset Effect of Urban Environment on Cardiovascular Health: A Feasibility Pilot Study using Machine Learning to Predict Heart Rate Variability in Heart Failure Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1