Green Transition's Necropolitics: Inequalities, Climate Extractivism, and Carbon Classes

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Antipode Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1111/anti.13032
Raphael Deberdt, Philippe Le Billon
{"title":"Green Transition's Necropolitics: Inequalities, Climate Extractivism, and Carbon Classes","authors":"Raphael Deberdt,&nbsp;Philippe Le Billon","doi":"10.1111/anti.13032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article theorises the processes of colonisation, wealth accumulation, and inequalities creation that the current paradigm of a resource-hungry green transition enacts on the most vulnerable populations. We suggest that the extractivist logics and related technical fixes are leading to a “climate necropolitics”. In this, the socio-economic system is increasingly defined by classes’ carbon exposure and consumption. Through the “green growth” of late capitalism, we theorise the advent of four carbon-defined classes. Bounded by the access to climate tech capital and consumption of low-carbon products, these include the ultra-carbonised, decarbonised, still-carbonised, and uncarbonised classes—with the first two acting as dominant classes and necropolitical agents sustained by the remaining lower classes. Inspired by Marxist scholars, we suggest that the current status quo is untenable and will result in class warfare during which coalitions between classes could reorient the “make live and let die” of the current green transition paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":"56 4","pages":"1264-1288"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.13032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article theorises the processes of colonisation, wealth accumulation, and inequalities creation that the current paradigm of a resource-hungry green transition enacts on the most vulnerable populations. We suggest that the extractivist logics and related technical fixes are leading to a “climate necropolitics”. In this, the socio-economic system is increasingly defined by classes’ carbon exposure and consumption. Through the “green growth” of late capitalism, we theorise the advent of four carbon-defined classes. Bounded by the access to climate tech capital and consumption of low-carbon products, these include the ultra-carbonised, decarbonised, still-carbonised, and uncarbonised classes—with the first two acting as dominant classes and necropolitical agents sustained by the remaining lower classes. Inspired by Marxist scholars, we suggest that the current status quo is untenable and will result in class warfare during which coalitions between classes could reorient the “make live and let die” of the current green transition paradigm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色转型的死亡政治:不平等、气候榨取主义和碳阶级
本文对殖民化、财富积累和不平等的产生过程进行了理论分析,当前的资源饥渴型绿色转型模式对最脆弱的人群产生了影响。我们认为,采掘逻辑和相关的技术解决方案正在导致 "气候死亡政治学"。在这种情况下,社会经济体系越来越多地由各阶层的碳暴露和碳消费来定义。通过晚期资本主义的 "绿色增长",我们从理论上提出了四个以碳为定义的阶级的出现。这些阶级以获取气候技术资本和消费低碳产品为边界,包括超碳化阶级、去碳化阶级、仍碳化阶级和未碳化阶级--前两个阶级作为主导阶级和新政治力量,由其余低层阶级维持。受马克思主义学者的启发,我们认为目前的现状是无法维持的,并将导致阶级斗争,而在阶级斗争期间,阶级之间的联盟可以重新定位当前绿色转型范式的 "生与死"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antipode
Antipode GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Referees, July 2023–June 2024 Offshore Citizenship: “Diversified Citizenship Portfolios” and the Regulatory Arbitrage of Global Wealth Elites Resisting Post-Political Adaptation to Climate Change: How a Small Community Stood Up to Big Development Sports Cages as Social Infrastructure: Sociality, Context, and Contest in Hackney's Cages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1