Are biological pretreatments of lignocellulosic residues a real option for biofuels production?

Carlos Antonio Alba Fierro, Miguel Ángel Escobedo Bretado, D. M. Núñez Ramírez, María Angélica Martell Nevárez, Francisco Javier Ríos Fránquez
{"title":"Are biological pretreatments of lignocellulosic residues a real option for biofuels production?","authors":"Carlos Antonio Alba Fierro, Miguel Ángel Escobedo Bretado, D. M. Núñez Ramírez, María Angélica Martell Nevárez, Francisco Javier Ríos Fránquez","doi":"10.15376/biores.19.2.albafierro","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of lignocellulosic residues as feedstocks for biofuels production represents an economic and ecofriendly option, since they are generated as byproducts or wastes from different industrial areas. Nevertheless, a pretreatment method aimed at eliminating the lignin content of these residues must be performed. This is required in order to increase cellulose bioavailability, which favors the production of reducing sugars through microbial or enzymatic attack. Some performed pretreatments can be classified as physical, chemical, and physicochemical methods. Although such methods are the most used pretreatments, they are expensive and generate or make use of harmful compounds. Biological methods, by the action of microorganisms or their enzymes for lignin content reduction, may be regarded as an alternative, being cheaper and more friendly to the environment than the aforementioned methods. However, until now, biological pretreatments have not shown the same yield as the previously mentioned methods in both sugar recovery and biofuel production. In that sense, the aim of this work is to review the efficiency of these methods, with the goal of clarifying their advantages and disadvantages for improvement of biofuel production.","PeriodicalId":503414,"journal":{"name":"BioResources","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioResources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.19.2.albafierro","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of lignocellulosic residues as feedstocks for biofuels production represents an economic and ecofriendly option, since they are generated as byproducts or wastes from different industrial areas. Nevertheless, a pretreatment method aimed at eliminating the lignin content of these residues must be performed. This is required in order to increase cellulose bioavailability, which favors the production of reducing sugars through microbial or enzymatic attack. Some performed pretreatments can be classified as physical, chemical, and physicochemical methods. Although such methods are the most used pretreatments, they are expensive and generate or make use of harmful compounds. Biological methods, by the action of microorganisms or their enzymes for lignin content reduction, may be regarded as an alternative, being cheaper and more friendly to the environment than the aforementioned methods. However, until now, biological pretreatments have not shown the same yield as the previously mentioned methods in both sugar recovery and biofuel production. In that sense, the aim of this work is to review the efficiency of these methods, with the goal of clarifying their advantages and disadvantages for improvement of biofuel production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
木质纤维素残渣的生物预处理是生物燃料生产的真正选择吗?
使用木质纤维素残渣作为生物燃料生产的原料是一种经济且环保的选择,因为它们是不同工业领域产生的副产品或废物。然而,必须采用一种预处理方法来消除这些残留物中的木质素含量。这样做的目的是提高纤维素的生物利用率,从而有利于通过微生物或酶的作用产生还原糖。有些预处理方法可分为物理、化学和物理化学方法。虽然这些方法是最常用的预处理方法,但成本高昂,而且会产生或使用有害化合物。通过微生物或其酶的作用来降低木质素含量的生物方法可被视为一种替代方法,它比上述方法更便宜,对环境也更友好。然而,到目前为止,生物预处理在糖分回收和生物燃料生产方面还没有显示出与上述方法相同的产量。从这个意义上说,这项工作的目的是审查这些方法的效率,以明确它们在提高生物燃料生产方面的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The eutrophication-related index of drinking water sources based on the oxidation-reduction potential A systematic classification and typological assessment method for mortise and tenon joints Structure and oxygen evolution reaction performance of Ni-supported catalysts based on steam-exploded poplar Methods for characterization and continuum modeling of inhomogeneous properties of paper and paperboard materials: A review Determining the optimum layer combination for cross-laminated timber panels according to timber strength classes using Artificial Neural Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1