Has R&D investment become riskier for CEOs after the Sarbanes Oxley Act?

IF 0.9 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1002/jcaf.22698
SeungWon Lee
{"title":"Has R&D investment become riskier for CEOs after the Sarbanes Oxley Act?","authors":"SeungWon Lee","doi":"10.1002/jcaf.22698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores the link between R&amp;D investment variability and CEO turnover across the eras surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). It posits that, after SOX, R&amp;D expenditure hikes not matched by sales growth may trigger more frequent CEO turnover, driven by a perceived increase in risk. Data from 1996 to 2010 reveal that, before SOX, R&amp;D increases positively correlate with CEO job stability. In contrast, after SOX, a rise in R&amp;D spending is linked to a higher rate of CEO turnover, particularly involuntary dismissals. The study further identifies that post-SOX, the negative impact of R&amp;D spikes on CEO turnover is significantly mitigated when such investment aligns with sales growth. The findings suggest a significant influence of R&amp;D investments on CEO turnover, underscoring the need for boards to deliberate the consequences of R&amp;D spending and CEO turnover to better align shareholders and CEO interests.</p>","PeriodicalId":44561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","volume":"35 3","pages":"350-363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcaf.22698","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the link between R&D investment variability and CEO turnover across the eras surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). It posits that, after SOX, R&D expenditure hikes not matched by sales growth may trigger more frequent CEO turnover, driven by a perceived increase in risk. Data from 1996 to 2010 reveal that, before SOX, R&D increases positively correlate with CEO job stability. In contrast, after SOX, a rise in R&D spending is linked to a higher rate of CEO turnover, particularly involuntary dismissals. The study further identifies that post-SOX, the negative impact of R&D spikes on CEO turnover is significantly mitigated when such investment aligns with sales growth. The findings suggest a significant influence of R&D investments on CEO turnover, underscoring the need for boards to deliberate the consequences of R&D spending and CEO turnover to better align shareholders and CEO interests.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》颁布后,首席执行官的研发投资风险是否增加了?
本研究探讨了《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》(Sarbanes-Oxley Act,SOX)颁布前后各个时期研发投资变化与首席执行官更替之间的联系。研究认为,在《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》颁布后,研发支出的增长与销售额的增长不相匹配,可能会在风险感知增加的驱动下引发更频繁的首席执行官更替。1996 年至 2010 年的数据显示,在 SOX 法案之前,研发支出的增加与首席执行官的工作稳定性呈正相关。相比之下,在《萨氏法案》颁布后,研发支出的增加与首席执行官的更替率有关,尤其是非自愿解雇。研究进一步发现,在《公司法》实施后,当研发投资与销售增长相一致时,研发支出激增对首席执行官流失率的负面影响就会大大降低。研究结果表明,研发投资对首席执行官的更替有重大影响,这突出表明董事会有必要慎重考虑研发支出和首席执行官更替的后果,以便更好地协调股东和首席执行官的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Do equity method investments moderate the financial performance benefits of CSR? The term structure of Japanese Government bonds in the super long term under different aspects of yield curve control Does macroeconomic uncertainty (really) influence managers’ earnings management?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1