Perception and acceptance of medical photography among Arab dermatology patients: a cross-sectional analysis

IF 2.3 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Dermatology Reports Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.4081/dr.2024.9925
Saba Alsuhaymi, Faisal Alghubaywi, Raghad Alharthi, Afaf Al AlSheikh, M. Aljasser
{"title":"Perception and acceptance of medical photography among Arab dermatology patients: a cross-sectional analysis","authors":"Saba Alsuhaymi, Faisal Alghubaywi, Raghad Alharthi, Afaf Al AlSheikh, M. Aljasser","doi":"10.4081/dr.2024.9925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medical photography has been utilized in clinical, academic, and research settings. In conservative countries, such as Saudi Arabia, limited data reflect patients’ viewpoints on medical photography. Objectives: To assess patients’ opinions on medical photography and the factors influencing its acceptability. Methods: A cross-sectional study utilizing a self-distributed paper-based questionnaire was performed in the dermatology clinics at King Abdulaziz Medical City (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) between February 2020 and January 2021. The response rate is 100% as only willing participants were handed a hard-copy survey and then retrieved once completed. Results: A total of 414 Saudi adults were enrolled. Medical photography was highly acceptable, fairly acceptable, and poorly acceptable in 36.7%, 11.6%, and 14.3% of the patients, respectively. Females were more accepting of medical photography than males (p = 0.041). Physicians were the most preferred choice as photographers (83%). Stating all intended use of the photographs was favored by the majority of patients. Using a department-owned camera was essential to 84%. Patients who never had their photographs taken previously were more unaccepting of medical photography than those with prior experience (p = 0.037). Limitations: the study was conducted at a single center; therefore, it may not represent the entire population. Conclusions: Medical photography is acceptable to the majority of patients. Meeting popular preferences, including physicians as photographers, using department-owned cameras, and stating all possible uses of the photographs may enhance patients’ experience. The findings offer insight for developing a standardized framework that is suitable for both patients and physicians.","PeriodicalId":11049,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2024.9925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical photography has been utilized in clinical, academic, and research settings. In conservative countries, such as Saudi Arabia, limited data reflect patients’ viewpoints on medical photography. Objectives: To assess patients’ opinions on medical photography and the factors influencing its acceptability. Methods: A cross-sectional study utilizing a self-distributed paper-based questionnaire was performed in the dermatology clinics at King Abdulaziz Medical City (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) between February 2020 and January 2021. The response rate is 100% as only willing participants were handed a hard-copy survey and then retrieved once completed. Results: A total of 414 Saudi adults were enrolled. Medical photography was highly acceptable, fairly acceptable, and poorly acceptable in 36.7%, 11.6%, and 14.3% of the patients, respectively. Females were more accepting of medical photography than males (p = 0.041). Physicians were the most preferred choice as photographers (83%). Stating all intended use of the photographs was favored by the majority of patients. Using a department-owned camera was essential to 84%. Patients who never had their photographs taken previously were more unaccepting of medical photography than those with prior experience (p = 0.037). Limitations: the study was conducted at a single center; therefore, it may not represent the entire population. Conclusions: Medical photography is acceptable to the majority of patients. Meeting popular preferences, including physicians as photographers, using department-owned cameras, and stating all possible uses of the photographs may enhance patients’ experience. The findings offer insight for developing a standardized framework that is suitable for both patients and physicians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉伯皮肤科患者对医学摄影的认知和接受程度:横断面分析
背景:医学摄影已被应用于临床、学术和研究领域。在沙特阿拉伯等保守国家,反映患者对医学摄影观点的数据有限。目的:评估患者对医学摄影的看法以及影响其接受程度的因素:评估患者对医学摄影的看法以及影响其可接受性的因素。方法:横断面研究:在 2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 1 月期间,在阿卜杜勒-阿齐兹国王医疗城(沙特阿拉伯利雅得)的皮肤科诊所进行了一项横断面研究,采用了自行分发的纸质问卷。由于只有愿意参与的参与者才会收到硬拷贝调查问卷,填写完成后再收回,因此回复率为 100%。结果:共有 414 名沙特成年人参与了调查。36.7%、11.6% 和 14.3% 的患者对医疗摄影的接受度很高、接受度较高和接受度较低。女性比男性更容易接受医疗摄影(p = 0.041)。医生是最受欢迎的摄影师(83%)。大多数患者倾向于说明照片的所有用途。84%的患者认为使用科室拥有的相机是必要的。从未拍摄过照片的患者比有过拍摄经验的患者更不接受医学摄影(p = 0.037)。局限性:该研究仅在一个中心进行,因此可能无法代表全部人群。结论:大多数患者都能接受医学摄影。满足大众的喜好、让医生担任摄影师、使用科室自备的相机以及说明照片的所有可能用途可能会改善患者的体验。研究结果为制定适合患者和医生的标准化框架提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatology Reports
Dermatology Reports DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of tildrakizumab 200 mg for treating difficult-to-treat patient populations with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis Scabies mimicking relapsing atopic dermatitis Blue diode laser as supportive therapy for the management of vulvar lichen sclerosus “Mosaic graft” technique and surgical dermal glue in Mohs micrographic surgery and general dermatologic surgery Cutaneous larva migrans: is dermoscopy useful for the treatment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1