Muscle activity and kinematics during three hamstring strengthening exercises compared to sprinting: A cross-sectional study

Adelso Jorge, Eric Lichtenstein, Oliver Faude, Ralf Roth
{"title":"Muscle activity and kinematics during three hamstring strengthening exercises compared to sprinting: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Adelso Jorge, Eric Lichtenstein, Oliver Faude, Ralf Roth","doi":"10.36950/2024.2ciss053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background \nSprinting is a crucial task in many sports and remains the major activity during which hamstring muscle injuries occur (Schache et al., 2012). Though the biceps femoris long head predominantly gets injured (Grange et al., 2023), hamstring strengthening exercises frequently seem to activate the semitendinosus more effectively (Bourne et al., 2017). A better understanding of how joint dominance influences activation levels of hamstring muscles may offer more clarity on the appropriate exercise selection in strengthening programs. \nPurpose \nThis study compared 3 hip-dominant hamstring exercises (the rocker, perpetuum mobile fast and slow; PMfast and PMslow) and the Nordic Hamstring exercise (NHE) on their potential to simulate sprint-like activity and kinematics. \nMethods \nMuscle activity of the posterior kinetic chain (mm. biceps femoris, semitendinosus, gluteus maximus and gastrocnemius medialis) was measured with surface electromyography (sEMG) during every exercise and treadmill running at 75% of the individual maximal sprint velocity in 8 male athletes (age: 24.0 years ± SD 2.9; body mass: 76.8 kg ± 7.7; height: 1.79 m ± 0.08). sEMG data was normalized to maximal sprinting. 3D-motion capture was employed to assess hip and knee angles. \nResults \nThis study revealed higher activity of the hamstrings for the explosive exercises ranging from 63.9% [95%CI: 56.3-71.5%] (rocker) to 49.0% [95%CI: 40.4-57.6%] (PMfast) vs. 34.0% [95%CI: 29.1-38.9%] (NHE) to 32.1% [95%CI: 26.9-37.3%] (PMslow). The rocker especially showed highest hamstring and m. gluteus maximus activity. M. biceps femoris consistently showed higher activity than m. semitendinosus across all exercises in peak (mean difference: 0.16, [95%CI: 0.07-0.26]) and average (mean difference: 0.06, [95%CI: 0.01-0.11]) activity. PMfast, PMslow and NHE demonstrated lower hip flexion angle of peak hamstring activity than the rocker and high-speed running and every exercise showed lower hamstring elongation stress than during high-speed running. \nDiscussion \nHamstring activity is comparable to high-intensity treadmill running for NHE and PMslow, and higher for the rocker and PMfast. M. gluteus maximus activity varied, with the rocker and PMfast showing higher activity than in sprinting. All examined exercises demonstrated their peak activity at short hamstring muscle length. \nWhat this study adds to the existing knowledge \nThis study generated first data on sprint-specificity of two not yet investigated versions of a unilateral hip thrust. Similar or higher activity than during sprinting and BFlh selectivity was reached through explosive, closed kinetic chain, hip-dominant movement. \nReferences \nBourne, M. N., Williams, M. D., Opar, D. A., Al Najjar, A., Kerr, G. K., & Shield, A. J. (2017). Impact of exercise selection on hamstring muscle activation. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(13), 1021-1028. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095739 \nGrange, S., Reurink, G., Nguyen, A. Q., Riviera-Navarro, C., Foschia, C., Croisille, P., & Edouard, P. (2023). Location of hamstring injuries based on magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review. Sports Health, 15(1), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381211071010 \nSchache, A. G., Dorn, T. W., Blanch, P. D., Brown, N. A., & Pandy, M. G. (2012). Mechanics of the human hamstring muscles during sprinting. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 44(4), 647-658. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318236a3d2","PeriodicalId":415194,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.2ciss053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Sprinting is a crucial task in many sports and remains the major activity during which hamstring muscle injuries occur (Schache et al., 2012). Though the biceps femoris long head predominantly gets injured (Grange et al., 2023), hamstring strengthening exercises frequently seem to activate the semitendinosus more effectively (Bourne et al., 2017). A better understanding of how joint dominance influences activation levels of hamstring muscles may offer more clarity on the appropriate exercise selection in strengthening programs. Purpose This study compared 3 hip-dominant hamstring exercises (the rocker, perpetuum mobile fast and slow; PMfast and PMslow) and the Nordic Hamstring exercise (NHE) on their potential to simulate sprint-like activity and kinematics. Methods Muscle activity of the posterior kinetic chain (mm. biceps femoris, semitendinosus, gluteus maximus and gastrocnemius medialis) was measured with surface electromyography (sEMG) during every exercise and treadmill running at 75% of the individual maximal sprint velocity in 8 male athletes (age: 24.0 years ± SD 2.9; body mass: 76.8 kg ± 7.7; height: 1.79 m ± 0.08). sEMG data was normalized to maximal sprinting. 3D-motion capture was employed to assess hip and knee angles. Results This study revealed higher activity of the hamstrings for the explosive exercises ranging from 63.9% [95%CI: 56.3-71.5%] (rocker) to 49.0% [95%CI: 40.4-57.6%] (PMfast) vs. 34.0% [95%CI: 29.1-38.9%] (NHE) to 32.1% [95%CI: 26.9-37.3%] (PMslow). The rocker especially showed highest hamstring and m. gluteus maximus activity. M. biceps femoris consistently showed higher activity than m. semitendinosus across all exercises in peak (mean difference: 0.16, [95%CI: 0.07-0.26]) and average (mean difference: 0.06, [95%CI: 0.01-0.11]) activity. PMfast, PMslow and NHE demonstrated lower hip flexion angle of peak hamstring activity than the rocker and high-speed running and every exercise showed lower hamstring elongation stress than during high-speed running. Discussion Hamstring activity is comparable to high-intensity treadmill running for NHE and PMslow, and higher for the rocker and PMfast. M. gluteus maximus activity varied, with the rocker and PMfast showing higher activity than in sprinting. All examined exercises demonstrated their peak activity at short hamstring muscle length. What this study adds to the existing knowledge This study generated first data on sprint-specificity of two not yet investigated versions of a unilateral hip thrust. Similar or higher activity than during sprinting and BFlh selectivity was reached through explosive, closed kinetic chain, hip-dominant movement. References Bourne, M. N., Williams, M. D., Opar, D. A., Al Najjar, A., Kerr, G. K., & Shield, A. J. (2017). Impact of exercise selection on hamstring muscle activation. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(13), 1021-1028. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095739 Grange, S., Reurink, G., Nguyen, A. Q., Riviera-Navarro, C., Foschia, C., Croisille, P., & Edouard, P. (2023). Location of hamstring injuries based on magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review. Sports Health, 15(1), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381211071010 Schache, A. G., Dorn, T. W., Blanch, P. D., Brown, N. A., & Pandy, M. G. (2012). Mechanics of the human hamstring muscles during sprinting. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 44(4), 647-658. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318236a3d2
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种腘绳肌强化训练与短跑的肌肉活动和运动学对比:横断面研究
背景 短跑是许多体育运动中的一项重要任务,也是腘绳肌受伤的主要活动(Schache 等人,2012 年)。虽然受伤的主要是股二头肌长头(Grange 等人,2023 年),但腘绳肌强化训练似乎经常能更有效地激活半腱肌(Bourne 等人,2017 年)。如果能更好地了解关节优势如何影响腘绳肌的激活水平,就能更清楚地知道在强化计划中如何选择合适的锻炼方式。目的 本研究比较了 3 种以髋关节为主的腘绳肌练习(摇臂、永动机快慢;PMfast 和 PMslow)和北欧腘绳肌练习(NHE)在模拟类似短跑的活动和运动学方面的潜力。方法 对 8 名男性运动员(年龄:24.0 岁 ± SD 2.9;体重:76.8 千克 ± 7.7;身高:1.79 米 ± 0.08)在每次运动和以个人最大冲刺速度的 75% 进行跑步时的表面肌电图(sEMG)测量后运动链(股二头肌、半腱肌、臀大肌和腓肠肌内侧)的肌肉活动。采用三维运动捕捉技术评估髋关节和膝关节角度。结果 这项研究显示,爆发力练习中腿筋的活动度较高,从 63.9% [95%CI: 56.3-71.5%](摇杆)到 49.0% [95%CI: 40.4-57.6%](PMfast),与 34.0% [95%CI: 29.1-38.9%](NHE)到 32.1% [95%CI: 26.9-37.3%](PMslow)。摇椅尤其显示出最高的腘绳肌和臀大肌活性。在所有练习中,股二头肌的峰值活动量(平均差异:0.16,[95%CI:0.07-0.26])和平均活动量(平均差异:0.06,[95%CI:0.01-0.11])始终高于半腱肌。与摇摆跑和高速跑相比,PMfast、PMslow 和 NHE 的腘绳肌活动峰值的髋关节屈曲角更低,而且与高速跑相比,每种练习都显示出更低的腘绳肌伸长应力。讨论 NHE 和 PMslow 的腘绳肌活动与高强度跑步相当,而摇椅和 PMfast 则更高。臀大肌的活动各不相同,摇摆式和快速原地踏步式的活动量高于短跑时的活动量。所有检查过的练习都在腘绳肌短时达到活动峰值。本研究对现有知识的补充 本研究首次获得了两种尚未研究过的单侧臀部推举的短跑特异性数据。通过爆发力、闭合动能链、髋关节为主的运动,达到了与短跑时相似或更高的活动和 BFlh 选择性。参考文献 Bourne, M. N., Williams, M. D., Opar, D. A., Al Najjar, A., Kerr, G. K., & Shield, A. J. (2017).运动选择对腿筋肌肉激活的影响。https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095739 Grange, S., Reurink, G., Nguyen, A. Q., Riviera-Navarro, C., Foschia, C., Croisille, P., & Edouard, P. (2023)。基于磁共振成像的腿筋损伤位置:系统回顾。https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381211071010 Schache, A. G., Dorn, T. W., Blanch, P. D., Brown, N. A., & Pandy, M. G. (2012)。短跑过程中的人体腿筋肌肉力学。运动与锻炼中的医学与科学》,44(4),647-658。https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318236a3d2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From supercrip to techno supercrip Associations between daily movement behaviors, sleep, and affect in older adults: An ecological momentary assessment study Position statement regarding the current standing of exercise therapy in Austria (Positionspapier zur Situation der Trainingstherapie in Österreich) The Perceived Instrumental Effects of Maltreatment in Sport (PIEMS) scale: Translation, (cross-)validation, and short-form development of the German version Who’s better? Adaptive comparative judgment of dance performances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1