Impact of optical wavelength on the reliability of photoplethysmography-based heart rate measurements outside of controlled laboratory environments

Manuel Meier, Christian Holz
{"title":"Impact of optical wavelength on the reliability of photoplethysmography-based heart rate measurements outside of controlled laboratory environments","authors":"Manuel Meier, Christian Holz","doi":"10.36950/2024.2ciss060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction \nThe effectiveness of heart rate (HR) measurements via photoplethysmography (PPG) depends on the wavelength of light used. Typical PPG sensors use green, red, or infrared light, each penetrating the skin to different depths (Ray et al., 2021). Here, we present a comparative analysis of the reliability of HR measurements using these wavelengths. \nMethods \nOur study collected a dataset of 16 participants, each wearing four PPG sensing devices placed at the forehead, sternum, ankle (supramalleolar), and wrist. Each device continuously recorded reflective PPG signals, whereas the device at the sternum additionally captured the Lead I ECG for reference. During the 13 hours of capture, participants went on an outdoor trip from downtown Zurich to the Jungfraujoch railway station at 3,460 m above sea level in the mountains. PPG measurements were obtained using a state-of-the-art MAX86141 optical analog front-end (AFE) coupled with an illumination module of red, green, and infrared LEDs (SFH7072), along with two photodiodes. The ECG recording was resolved by a biopotential AFE (MAX30003), affixed on the chest with gel electrodes. All devices were synchronized by aligning recorded signals post-hoc (33ms accuracy, Meier & Holz, 2023). The HR was extracted from the ECG via time-domain peak detection and a quotient filter. HR was separately derived from each PPG signal, both by time-domain peak detection and frequency-domain analysis. The HR was computed every 5 seconds for a window of 30 seconds. For comparing wavelengths, measurements were considered if at least one wavelength yielded HR with less than 10% error which corresponds to 95,000 HR measurements across the whole dataset. \nResults \nHR derived from green PPG was most accurate (median error of 3.8%), followed by infrared (7.2%) and red PPG (9.1%). Given participants activity and movement throughout the 13 hours of capture, calculating HR from green PPG was most accurate 64.2% of the time compared to infrared (21.8%) and red PPG (15.2%). The latter cases, infrared and red PPG resulting in more accurate HR, occurred during periods of moderate and high motion. \nDiscussion/Conclusion \nThe results indicate that wearable sensors that derive HR from green light PPG can improve their calculations by incorporating additional wavelengths. Since HR based on green light PPG is accurate at rest, PPG using infrared and red would be most beneficial during periods of moderate and increased motion. This finding demonstrates the suitability of infrared and red PPG beyond pulse oxygenation measurements (SpO2). Future work should investigate methods to optimally combine multi-wavelength PPG into a single HR calculation. \nReferences \nMeier, M., & Holz, C. (2023). BMAR: Barometric and Motion-based Alignment and Refinement for offline signal synchronization across devices. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 7(2), Article 69. https://doi.org/10.1145/3596268 \nRay, D., Collins, T., Woolley, S., & Ponnapalli, P. (2021). A review of wearable multi-wavelength photoplethysmography. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 16, 136-1551. https://doi.org/10.1109/rbme.2021.3121476","PeriodicalId":415194,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","volume":"159 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.2ciss060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The effectiveness of heart rate (HR) measurements via photoplethysmography (PPG) depends on the wavelength of light used. Typical PPG sensors use green, red, or infrared light, each penetrating the skin to different depths (Ray et al., 2021). Here, we present a comparative analysis of the reliability of HR measurements using these wavelengths. Methods Our study collected a dataset of 16 participants, each wearing four PPG sensing devices placed at the forehead, sternum, ankle (supramalleolar), and wrist. Each device continuously recorded reflective PPG signals, whereas the device at the sternum additionally captured the Lead I ECG for reference. During the 13 hours of capture, participants went on an outdoor trip from downtown Zurich to the Jungfraujoch railway station at 3,460 m above sea level in the mountains. PPG measurements were obtained using a state-of-the-art MAX86141 optical analog front-end (AFE) coupled with an illumination module of red, green, and infrared LEDs (SFH7072), along with two photodiodes. The ECG recording was resolved by a biopotential AFE (MAX30003), affixed on the chest with gel electrodes. All devices were synchronized by aligning recorded signals post-hoc (33ms accuracy, Meier & Holz, 2023). The HR was extracted from the ECG via time-domain peak detection and a quotient filter. HR was separately derived from each PPG signal, both by time-domain peak detection and frequency-domain analysis. The HR was computed every 5 seconds for a window of 30 seconds. For comparing wavelengths, measurements were considered if at least one wavelength yielded HR with less than 10% error which corresponds to 95,000 HR measurements across the whole dataset. Results HR derived from green PPG was most accurate (median error of 3.8%), followed by infrared (7.2%) and red PPG (9.1%). Given participants activity and movement throughout the 13 hours of capture, calculating HR from green PPG was most accurate 64.2% of the time compared to infrared (21.8%) and red PPG (15.2%). The latter cases, infrared and red PPG resulting in more accurate HR, occurred during periods of moderate and high motion. Discussion/Conclusion The results indicate that wearable sensors that derive HR from green light PPG can improve their calculations by incorporating additional wavelengths. Since HR based on green light PPG is accurate at rest, PPG using infrared and red would be most beneficial during periods of moderate and increased motion. This finding demonstrates the suitability of infrared and red PPG beyond pulse oxygenation measurements (SpO2). Future work should investigate methods to optimally combine multi-wavelength PPG into a single HR calculation. References Meier, M., & Holz, C. (2023). BMAR: Barometric and Motion-based Alignment and Refinement for offline signal synchronization across devices. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 7(2), Article 69. https://doi.org/10.1145/3596268 Ray, D., Collins, T., Woolley, S., & Ponnapalli, P. (2021). A review of wearable multi-wavelength photoplethysmography. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 16, 136-1551. https://doi.org/10.1109/rbme.2021.3121476
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光波长对在受控实验室环境外进行基于血压计的心率测量的可靠性的影响
导言 通过光敏血压计(PPG)测量心率(HR)的效果取决于所使用的光波长。典型的 PPG 传感器使用绿光、红光或红外光,每种光穿透皮肤的深度不同(Ray 等人,2021 年)。在此,我们对使用这些波长进行心率测量的可靠性进行了比较分析。方法 我们的研究收集了 16 位参与者的数据集,每位参与者都佩戴了四个 PPG 传感设备,分别放置在前额、胸骨、脚踝(踝上)和手腕处。每个装置都会连续记录反射式 PPG 信号,而胸骨处的装置还会捕捉 I 号导联心电图作为参考。在 13 个小时的采集过程中,参与者从苏黎世市中心前往海拔 3460 米的少女峰火车站进行户外旅行。PPG 测量采用了最先进的 MAX86141 光学模拟前端 (AFE),并配有由红色、绿色和红外线 LED 组成的照明模块 (SFH7072),以及两个光电二极管。心电图记录由一个生物电位 AFE(MAX30003)解析,并用凝胶电极固定在胸部。所有设备通过事后对齐记录信号实现同步(精确度为 33 毫秒,Meier & Holz,2023 年)。通过时域峰值检测和商滤波器从心电图中提取心率。通过时域峰值检测和频域分析,分别从每个 PPG 信号中提取心率。在 30 秒的窗口内,每 5 秒计算一次心率。在比较波长时,如果至少有一个波长得出的心率误差小于 10%(相当于整个数据集中的 95,000 次心率测量),则视为测量结果。结果 由绿色 PPG 得出的心率最为准确(误差中位数为 3.8%),其次是红外线(7.2%)和红色 PPG(9.1%)。考虑到参与者在 13 个小时采集过程中的活动和移动情况,通过绿色 PPG 计算心率的准确率为 64.2%,而通过红外线 PPG 计算心率的准确率为 21.8%,通过红色 PPG 计算心率的准确率为 15.2%。后一种情况,即红外线和红色 PPG 导致更准确的心率,发生在中度和高度运动期间。讨论/结论 结果表明,从绿光 PPG 导出心率的可穿戴传感器可以通过增加波长来改进其计算。由于基于绿光 PPG 的心率在静息状态下是准确的,使用红外线和红光的 PPG 在中度和高度运动时最有益处。这一发现证明了红外线和红光 PPG 在脉搏氧合测量(SpO2)之外的适用性。未来的工作应研究如何将多波长 PPG 最佳地结合到单一的心率计算中。参考文献 Meier, M., & Holz, C. (2023).BMAR:基于气压和运动的跨设备离线信号同步对齐和细化。https://doi.org/10.1145/3596268 Ray, D., Collins, T., Woolley, S., & Ponnapalli, P. (2021).可穿戴式多波长光敏血压计综述。IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 16, 136-1551. https://doi.org/10.1109/rbme.2021.3121476
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From supercrip to techno supercrip Associations between daily movement behaviors, sleep, and affect in older adults: An ecological momentary assessment study Position statement regarding the current standing of exercise therapy in Austria (Positionspapier zur Situation der Trainingstherapie in Österreich) The Perceived Instrumental Effects of Maltreatment in Sport (PIEMS) scale: Translation, (cross-)validation, and short-form development of the German version Who’s better? Adaptive comparative judgment of dance performances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1