Sex related differences in neuromuscular fatiguability between prepubertal children and young adults

Romina Ledergerber, Eric Lichtenstein, Ralf Roth
{"title":"Sex related differences in neuromuscular fatiguability between prepubertal children and young adults","authors":"Romina Ledergerber, Eric Lichtenstein, Ralf Roth","doi":"10.36950/2024.2ciss058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction \nPrepubertal children compared to adults manifest neuromuscular differences in a lower voluntary activation and fatigability, as well as a potentially lesser use of larger motor units innervating fast-twitch-fibers (Dotan et al., 2012). While children tend to fatigue more on a central than peripheral level, these trends vary based on exercise modality and muscle group (Ratel et al., 2015; Souron et al., 2022). Furthermore, females incline to fatigue less than males, but research on sex differences in children remains limited (Hunter, 2014). Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate neuromuscular age and sex differences in a sustained isometric contraction until failure. \nMethods \n16 prepubertal children (9.2 ± 0.9y) and 16 adults (23.4 ± 2.4y; m = f) performed a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVCpre), a failure-task at 60%MVCpre, followed by another MVCpost of knee extensors. Surface electromyography for rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM), and vastus lateralis muscles (VL) was analysed at 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of the individual time to failure (TTF). Linear models and Cohen’s d effect sizes were used to quantify age and sex differences of TTF, MVCpre-post, as well as root mean square (RMS) and median frequency (MDF) of each muscle throughout the fatiguing trial. \nResults \nTrivial differences were observed in TTF across age, sex, and age*sex-interaction (d ≤ 0.78). Children displayed a larger decline in MVCpre-post (d = 1.24), whereas sex and age*sex interactions were minimal (d ≤ 0.63). \nInitially (0% TTF), children had a lower activation in RF, VL and VL (d > 1.32), whereas age-differences across the failure-task were found for RMS VL, MDF RF, VL and VM (d ≥ 0.15), with no prominent sex-differences (d ≤ 0.14). Sex*age-interaction yielded detectable results only in RMS VM (d = -0.36). \nConclusion \nThe lower ability to generate an MVCpost combined with a smaller change in EMG parameters in children could be due to more central rather than peripheral fatigue. This is also supported by the lower initial activation in adults, suggesting that larger, more fatigable motor units are initially preserved, which may not be available in children. \nThe small to large effects in neuromuscular fatigability between age and sex groups indicate the need for more in-depth research (tracking of motor units, change of voluntary activation and twitch properties) particularly with regard to sex-related disparities. \nReferences \nDotan, R., Mitchell, C., Cohen, R., Klentrou, P., Gabriel, D., & Falk, B. (2012). Child-adult differences in muscle activation—A review. Pediatric Exercise Science, 24(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.24.1.2 \nHunter, S. K. (2014). Sex differences in human fatigability: Mechanisms and insight to physiological responses. Acta Physiologica, 210(4), 768–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.12234 \nRatel, S., Kluka, V., Vicencio, S. G., Jegu, A.-G., Cardenoux, C., Morio, C., Coudeyre, E., & Martin, V. (2015). Insights into the mechanisms of neuromuscular fatigue in boys and men. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 47(11), 2319–2328. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000697 \nSouron, R., Carayol, M., Martin, V., Enzo, P., Duché, P., & Gruet, M. (2022). Differences in time to task failure and fatigability between children and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Physiology, 13, Article 1026012. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1026012","PeriodicalId":415194,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.2ciss058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Prepubertal children compared to adults manifest neuromuscular differences in a lower voluntary activation and fatigability, as well as a potentially lesser use of larger motor units innervating fast-twitch-fibers (Dotan et al., 2012). While children tend to fatigue more on a central than peripheral level, these trends vary based on exercise modality and muscle group (Ratel et al., 2015; Souron et al., 2022). Furthermore, females incline to fatigue less than males, but research on sex differences in children remains limited (Hunter, 2014). Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate neuromuscular age and sex differences in a sustained isometric contraction until failure. Methods 16 prepubertal children (9.2 ± 0.9y) and 16 adults (23.4 ± 2.4y; m = f) performed a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVCpre), a failure-task at 60%MVCpre, followed by another MVCpost of knee extensors. Surface electromyography for rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM), and vastus lateralis muscles (VL) was analysed at 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of the individual time to failure (TTF). Linear models and Cohen’s d effect sizes were used to quantify age and sex differences of TTF, MVCpre-post, as well as root mean square (RMS) and median frequency (MDF) of each muscle throughout the fatiguing trial. Results Trivial differences were observed in TTF across age, sex, and age*sex-interaction (d ≤ 0.78). Children displayed a larger decline in MVCpre-post (d = 1.24), whereas sex and age*sex interactions were minimal (d ≤ 0.63). Initially (0% TTF), children had a lower activation in RF, VL and VL (d > 1.32), whereas age-differences across the failure-task were found for RMS VL, MDF RF, VL and VM (d ≥ 0.15), with no prominent sex-differences (d ≤ 0.14). Sex*age-interaction yielded detectable results only in RMS VM (d = -0.36). Conclusion The lower ability to generate an MVCpost combined with a smaller change in EMG parameters in children could be due to more central rather than peripheral fatigue. This is also supported by the lower initial activation in adults, suggesting that larger, more fatigable motor units are initially preserved, which may not be available in children. The small to large effects in neuromuscular fatigability between age and sex groups indicate the need for more in-depth research (tracking of motor units, change of voluntary activation and twitch properties) particularly with regard to sex-related disparities. References Dotan, R., Mitchell, C., Cohen, R., Klentrou, P., Gabriel, D., & Falk, B. (2012). Child-adult differences in muscle activation—A review. Pediatric Exercise Science, 24(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.24.1.2 Hunter, S. K. (2014). Sex differences in human fatigability: Mechanisms and insight to physiological responses. Acta Physiologica, 210(4), 768–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.12234 Ratel, S., Kluka, V., Vicencio, S. G., Jegu, A.-G., Cardenoux, C., Morio, C., Coudeyre, E., & Martin, V. (2015). Insights into the mechanisms of neuromuscular fatigue in boys and men. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 47(11), 2319–2328. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000697 Souron, R., Carayol, M., Martin, V., Enzo, P., Duché, P., & Gruet, M. (2022). Differences in time to task failure and fatigability between children and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Physiology, 13, Article 1026012. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1026012
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青春期前儿童和青少年在神经肌肉疲劳度方面的性别差异
引言 青春期前的儿童与成人相比,在神经肌肉方面存在差异,表现为自主激活和疲劳程度较低,以及可能较少使用支配快速肌动纤维的较大运动单位(Dotan 等人,2012 年)。虽然儿童倾向于中枢疲劳多于外周疲劳,但这些趋势因运动方式和肌肉群而异(Ratel 等人,2015 年;Souron 等人,2022 年)。此外,女性比男性更容易疲劳,但对儿童性别差异的研究仍然有限(Hunter,2014)。因此,本研究旨在调查神经肌肉在持续等长收缩直至失效时的年龄和性别差异。方法 16 名青春期前儿童(9.2 ± 0.9 岁)和 16 名成人(23.4 ± 2.4 岁;男 = 女)进行最大自主等长收缩(MVCpre),在 60%MVCpre 时进行失败任务,然后再进行一次伸膝的 MVCpost。对股直肌 (RF)、内侧肌 (VM) 和外侧肌 (VL) 的表面肌电图在 0、25、50、75 和 100% 的单次失败时间 (TTF) 进行了分析。采用线性模型和 Cohen's d效应大小来量化整个疲劳试验过程中每块肌肉的 TTF、MVCpre-post、均方根(RMS)和中频(MDF)的年龄和性别差异。结果 观察到不同年龄、性别和年龄*性别交互作用(d ≤ 0.78)的 TTF 存在微小差异。儿童的 MVC 在前后的下降幅度较大(d = 1.24),而性别和年龄*性别的交互作用很小(d ≤ 0.63)。最初(0% TTF),儿童的 RF、VL 和 VL 激活较低(d > 1.32),而在失败任务中,RMS VL、MDF RF、VL 和 VM 存在年龄差异(d ≥ 0.15),性别差异不明显(d ≤ 0.14)。性别*年龄交互作用仅在 RMS VM 中产生了可检测的结果(d = -0.36)。结论 儿童产生 MVCpost 的能力较低,同时 EMG 参数的变化较小,这可能是由于中枢疲劳而非外周疲劳造成的。成人较低的初始激活也证明了这一点,这表明较大的、更易疲劳的运动单元在初始阶段得到了保留,而儿童可能没有这些单元。年龄组和性别组之间在神经肌肉疲劳性方面的影响有大有小,这表明有必要进行更深入的研究(跟踪运动单位、自主激活和抽动特性的变化),特别是与性别有关的差异。参考文献 Dotan, R., Mitchell, C., Cohen, R., Klentrou, P., Gabriel, D., & Falk, B. (2012)。儿童与成人肌肉激活的差异--综述。https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.24.1.2 Hunter, S. K. (2014).人类疲劳性的性别差异:生理反应的机制和见解。https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.12234 Ratel, S., Kluka, V., Vicencio, S. G., Jegu, A.-G., Cardenoux, C., Morio, C., Coudeyre, E., & Martin, V. (2015).洞察男孩和男子神经肌肉疲劳的机制。https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000697 Souron, R., Carayol, M., Martin, V., Enzo, P., Duché, P., & Gruet, M. (2022)。儿童和青少年任务失败和疲劳时间的差异:系统回顾与荟萃分析》。生理学前沿》,13,第 1026012 条。https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1026012。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From supercrip to techno supercrip Associations between daily movement behaviors, sleep, and affect in older adults: An ecological momentary assessment study Position statement regarding the current standing of exercise therapy in Austria (Positionspapier zur Situation der Trainingstherapie in Österreich) The Perceived Instrumental Effects of Maltreatment in Sport (PIEMS) scale: Translation, (cross-)validation, and short-form development of the German version Who’s better? Adaptive comparative judgment of dance performances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1