{"title":"Perspectives on meaning in qualitative research","authors":"Noora J. Ronkainen, Michael McDougall","doi":"10.36950/2024.2ciss001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A characterising trait of qualitative research, as opposed to quantitative research, is its assumed focus on meaning. For example, Smith and Sparkes (2016, p. 2) suggested that “To interpret phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them, qualitative researchers draw on a variety of empirical materials”. Although there might be an intuitive understanding of what “meaning” means, different traditions of qualitative research have unique ways of conceptualising where meaning is located and how it might best be studied. In this presentation, we will explore three qualitative traditions – phenomenology, narrative inquiry and cultural analysis – to explicate these different assumptions and how they influence the qualitative research process. Firstly, we will focus on phenomenological approaches to qualitative research which often emphasise the lived, pre-verbal experience of meaning before it is crystallised into words. From this perspective, the challenge for the qualitative research is to help the participants to explicate meanings of their experience through careful questioning. Secondly, we explore narrative approaches that consider meaning as created through storytelling and co-constructed with the researcher with particular audiences in mind. From this perspective, meaning is personal, but constructed from the cultural building blocks of example stories that are available to the storyteller. Finally, in cultural analysis, the focus is not on personal meaning, but rather the culturally shared webs of significance that make meaningful actions possible for cultural insiders. We conclude that explicating the types of assumptions that researchers draw on in the study of meaning can enhance the quality of qualitative research, and that the diverse perspectives often lead to complementary, enriching understandings of meaning in the world of sport and physical culture.\nReferences\nSmith, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (Eds.). (2016). Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. Routledge.","PeriodicalId":415194,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","volume":"29 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.2ciss001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A characterising trait of qualitative research, as opposed to quantitative research, is its assumed focus on meaning. For example, Smith and Sparkes (2016, p. 2) suggested that “To interpret phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them, qualitative researchers draw on a variety of empirical materials”. Although there might be an intuitive understanding of what “meaning” means, different traditions of qualitative research have unique ways of conceptualising where meaning is located and how it might best be studied. In this presentation, we will explore three qualitative traditions – phenomenology, narrative inquiry and cultural analysis – to explicate these different assumptions and how they influence the qualitative research process. Firstly, we will focus on phenomenological approaches to qualitative research which often emphasise the lived, pre-verbal experience of meaning before it is crystallised into words. From this perspective, the challenge for the qualitative research is to help the participants to explicate meanings of their experience through careful questioning. Secondly, we explore narrative approaches that consider meaning as created through storytelling and co-constructed with the researcher with particular audiences in mind. From this perspective, meaning is personal, but constructed from the cultural building blocks of example stories that are available to the storyteller. Finally, in cultural analysis, the focus is not on personal meaning, but rather the culturally shared webs of significance that make meaningful actions possible for cultural insiders. We conclude that explicating the types of assumptions that researchers draw on in the study of meaning can enhance the quality of qualitative research, and that the diverse perspectives often lead to complementary, enriching understandings of meaning in the world of sport and physical culture.
References
Smith, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (Eds.). (2016). Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. Routledge.
与定量研究相比,定性研究的一个特点是其假定的对意义的关注。例如,Smith 和 Sparkes(2016 年,第 2 页)指出:"为了根据人们赋予现象的意义来解释现象,定性研究人员会利用各种经验材料"。尽管对 "意义 "的含义可能有直观的理解,但不同的定性研究传统对意义的定位以及如何对其进行最佳研究有着独特的概念化方式。在本讲座中,我们将探讨现象学、叙事探究和文化分析这三种定性研究传统,以阐释这些不同的假设及其如何影响定性研究过程。首先,我们将重点介绍现象学的定性研究方法,这种方法通常强调意义在转化为文字之前的生活体验和前语言体验。从这个角度看,定性研究面临的挑战是通过仔细提问帮助参与者阐释其经验的意义。其次,我们探讨了叙事方法,认为意义是通过讲故事创造出来的,是与研究者共同构建的,并考虑到了特定的受众。从这个角度看,意义是个人的,但却是由讲故事的人所掌握的范例故事的文化基石构建而成的。最后,在文化分析中,重点不在于个人意义,而在于文化共享的意义网,这些意义网使得文化内部人士采取有意义的行动成为可能。我们的结论是,说明研究人员在意义研究中借鉴的假设类型可以提高定性研究的质量,而且不同的视角往往会导致对体育和体育文化世界中意义的互补性和丰富性理解。(2016).Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise.Routledge.