Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation program to enhance EFL undergraduates’ writing performance in China

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Asia Pacific Education Review Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1007/s12564-023-09922-5
Jingxin Geng, Abu Bakar Razali, Lilliati Ismail, Nooreen Noordin
{"title":"Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation program to enhance EFL undergraduates’ writing performance in China","authors":"Jingxin Geng,&nbsp;Abu Bakar Razali,&nbsp;Lilliati Ismail,&nbsp;Nooreen Noordin","doi":"10.1007/s12564-023-09922-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Automated writing evaluation (AWE) program has huge potential to facilitate English writing instruction and EFL learners’ learning. As one of the most massively implemented AWE programs in China, the Pigai program has gained increasing ground in English writing instruction. However, a paucity of research limits to addressing its effects as an assisted teaching tool. Therefore, this study was conducted to ascertain the effect of the AWE-Pigai assisted process-based approach in improving Chinese EFL undergraduates’ writing performance and their error correction ability. As such, three intact classes from the first year in English major at a university in China were recruited. They received three different teaching approaches respectively: the Process-based writing approach (PBWA), the combined use of the Pigai program and the PBWA (Pigai + PBWA), and the conventional teaching approach. After a 14-week training program and a month after the intervention, students’ writing performance at three different time slots were compared, i.e., pre-, post-, and post-delayed tests. Results indicated that the Pigai + PBWA was able to outperform the other two methods in improving students’ writing performance and displayed a better post-delay effect in internalizing students’ writing knowledge in their long-term memory. Finally, the pedagogical implications of this study were also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47344,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Education Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"241 - 256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-023-09922-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated writing evaluation (AWE) program has huge potential to facilitate English writing instruction and EFL learners’ learning. As one of the most massively implemented AWE programs in China, the Pigai program has gained increasing ground in English writing instruction. However, a paucity of research limits to addressing its effects as an assisted teaching tool. Therefore, this study was conducted to ascertain the effect of the AWE-Pigai assisted process-based approach in improving Chinese EFL undergraduates’ writing performance and their error correction ability. As such, three intact classes from the first year in English major at a university in China were recruited. They received three different teaching approaches respectively: the Process-based writing approach (PBWA), the combined use of the Pigai program and the PBWA (Pigai + PBWA), and the conventional teaching approach. After a 14-week training program and a month after the intervention, students’ writing performance at three different time slots were compared, i.e., pre-, post-, and post-delayed tests. Results indicated that the Pigai + PBWA was able to outperform the other two methods in improving students’ writing performance and displayed a better post-delay effect in internalizing students’ writing knowledge in their long-term memory. Finally, the pedagogical implications of this study were also discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动化写作评估程序对提高中国 EFL 本科生写作成绩的效果
自动写作评估(AWE)在促进英语写作教学和英语学习者的学习方面具有巨大的潜力。作为中国最大规模实施的AWE项目之一,Pigai项目在英语写作教学中占有越来越重要的地位。然而,研究的缺乏限制了其作为辅助教学工具的效果。因此,本研究旨在探讨基于过程的AWE-Pigai辅助方法在提高中国大学生英语写作成绩和纠错能力方面的作用。因此,从中国一所大学的英语专业一年级招募了三个完整的班级。他们分别接受了三种不同的教学方法:基于过程的写作方法(PBWA), Pigai计划和PBWA的结合使用(Pigai + PBWA),以及传统的教学方法。经过14周的训练和干预后一个月,比较了学生在三个不同时间段的写作表现,即测试前、测试后和延迟测试后。结果表明,Pigai + PBWA在提高学生写作成绩方面优于其他两种方法,并且在学生长期记忆内化写作知识方面表现出更好的后延迟效应。最后,本文也讨论了本研究的教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Education Review
Asia Pacific Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Education Review (APER) aims to stimulate research, encourage academic exchange, and enhance the professional development of scholars and other researchers who are interested in educational and cultural issues in the Asia Pacific region. APER covers all areas of educational research, with a focus on cross-cultural, comparative and other studies with a broad Asia-Pacific context. APER is a peer reviewed journal produced by the Education Research Institute at Seoul National University. It was founded by the Institute of Asia Pacific Education Development, Seoul National University in 2000, which is owned and operated by Education Research Institute at Seoul National University since 2003. APER requires all submitted manuscripts to follow the seventh edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA; http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspx).
期刊最新文献
Inquiry in the Asia–Pacific: reflections on contextuality and interdependence Peace education research in East Asia, 2020–2025: key works published in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean Facilitating Conditions and Challenges for Stakeholders’ Uptake of the Affordances of E-Portfolio Assessment at a Hong Kong University Choosing a U.S. branch campus in Korea: a case study of Korean students’ decision-making through the trilateral push–pull model Exploring links between feedback, emotions, and behavioral engagement in secondary school Singaporean students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1