Prevalence of Central Sleep Apnea among Veterans and Response Rate to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy

Nesrine Adly Ibrahim, Abdulghani Sankari, A. Aldwaikat, Nishtha Pandya, S. Chowdhuri, A. Salloum, Jennifer L Martin, S. Zeineddine, M. S. Badr
{"title":"Prevalence of Central Sleep Apnea among Veterans and Response Rate to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy","authors":"Nesrine Adly Ibrahim, Abdulghani Sankari, A. Aldwaikat, Nishtha Pandya, S. Chowdhuri, A. Salloum, Jennifer L Martin, S. Zeineddine, M. S. Badr","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in the Veteran population. In this retrospective study, we investigated the prevalence of comorbid central and obstructive SDB and the response rate to PAP among Veterans.\n \n \n \n Veterans were screened from a single VA medical center who had a polysomnography (PSG) study from 2017-2021 to ascertain the presence, severity, and type of SDB by measuring the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and Central Apnea Index (CAI). Patients were excluded if they did not have complete studies (diagnostic and PAP titration studies). The inclusion criteria for these analyses were central sleep apnea (CSA) defined as AHI ≥ 10 events/hour and CAI ≥ 5 events/ hour. Diagnostic “CSA only” was defined as AHI ≥ 10 events/ hour and CAI ≥ 50% of AHI. “OSA only” was defined if AHI≥ 10 events/ hour and CAI < 5 events/ hour. Comorbid central and obstructive sleep apnea (COSA) was defined if AHI≥ 10 events/ hour and CAI > 5 events/ hour but <50% of AHI. The responsiveness to PAP therapy was determined based on the CAI < 5 events/h on the titration study.\n \n \n \n A total of 90 patients met the inclusion criteria and from those 64 Veterans were found to have COSA (71%), 18 (20%) were CSA only, and 8 (9%) were OSA only. A total of 22 (24.4%) Veterans diagnosed with CSA or COSA were responsive to PAP therapy. Sixty days after treatment initiation, both responsive and nonresponsive groups had significant decreases in AHI and CAI (p<0.05).\n \n \n \n Comorbid central and obstructive SDB is common among Veterans. The response to PAP therapy is suboptimal but improves over time.\n","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in the Veteran population. In this retrospective study, we investigated the prevalence of comorbid central and obstructive SDB and the response rate to PAP among Veterans. Veterans were screened from a single VA medical center who had a polysomnography (PSG) study from 2017-2021 to ascertain the presence, severity, and type of SDB by measuring the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and Central Apnea Index (CAI). Patients were excluded if they did not have complete studies (diagnostic and PAP titration studies). The inclusion criteria for these analyses were central sleep apnea (CSA) defined as AHI ≥ 10 events/hour and CAI ≥ 5 events/ hour. Diagnostic “CSA only” was defined as AHI ≥ 10 events/ hour and CAI ≥ 50% of AHI. “OSA only” was defined if AHI≥ 10 events/ hour and CAI < 5 events/ hour. Comorbid central and obstructive sleep apnea (COSA) was defined if AHI≥ 10 events/ hour and CAI > 5 events/ hour but <50% of AHI. The responsiveness to PAP therapy was determined based on the CAI < 5 events/h on the titration study. A total of 90 patients met the inclusion criteria and from those 64 Veterans were found to have COSA (71%), 18 (20%) were CSA only, and 8 (9%) were OSA only. A total of 22 (24.4%) Veterans diagnosed with CSA or COSA were responsive to PAP therapy. Sixty days after treatment initiation, both responsive and nonresponsive groups had significant decreases in AHI and CAI (p<0.05). Comorbid central and obstructive SDB is common among Veterans. The response to PAP therapy is suboptimal but improves over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退伍军人中中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停的患病率和对持续气道正压疗法的反应率
睡眠呼吸障碍 (SDB) 在退伍军人中很常见。在这项回顾性研究中,我们调查了退伍军人中合并中枢性和阻塞性 SDB 的患病率以及对 PAP 的响应率。 我们从一个退伍军人医疗中心筛选出 2017-2021 年间进行过多导睡眠图(PSG)检查的退伍军人,通过测量呼吸暂停-低通气指数(AHI)和中枢性呼吸暂停指数(CAI)来确定 SDB 的存在、严重程度和类型。如果患者没有完整的研究(诊断和 PAP 滴定研究),则将其排除在外。这些分析的纳入标准是中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停(CSA),即 AHI ≥ 10 次/小时和 CAI ≥ 5 次/小时。诊断性 "仅 CSA "是指 AHI ≥ 10 次/小时且 CAI ≥ AHI 的 50%。如果 AHI ≥ 10 次/小时且 CAI < 5 次/小时,则定义为 "仅 OSA"。如果 AHI ≥ 10 次/小时且 CAI > 5 次/小时但低于 AHI 的 50%,则定义为合并中枢性和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(COSA)。在滴定研究中,根据 CAI < 5 事件/小时来确定对 PAP 治疗的反应性。 共有 90 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 64 名退伍军人(71%)患有 COSA,18 名(20%)仅患有 CSA,8 名(9%)仅患有 OSA。共有 22 名(24.4%)被诊断为 CSA 或 COSA 的退伍军人对 PAP 治疗有反应。治疗开始 60 天后,有反应组和无反应组的 AHI 和 CAI 均显著下降(P<0.05)。 中枢性和阻塞性 SDB 合并症在退伍军人中很常见。对 PAP 治疗的反应并不理想,但随着时间的推移会有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Central Role of Sulcal Width in the Associations of Sleep Duration and Depression with Cognition in Mid to Late Life Clinical and Financial Significance of Insomnia within a Large Payor-Provider Health System Impact of Real-World Implementation of Evidence-Based Insomnia Treatment within a Large Payor-Provider Health System: Initial Provider and Patient-Level Outcomes Poor Sleep and Inflammatory Gene Expression Among Care Partners of Persons Living with Dementia: A Pilot Trial of a Behavioral Sleep Intervention Sex-Specific Associations Between Habitual Snoring and Cancer Prevalence: Insights from a U.S. Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1