{"title":"Lyrical prayer poetry by priest poets. K. Kravtsov’s and S. Kruglov’s poetic prayers","authors":"V. A. Razumov","doi":"10.31425/0042-8795-2024-1-98-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article undertakes a comparative study of the lyrical prayer poetry authored by K. Kravtsov and S. Kruglov, both ordained priests as well as poets and each offering a personal interpretation of the canon of prayer, transforming it into a unique poetic genre. Going into the history of the phenomenon, V. Razumov provides a classification of the prayer genres proper, noting that the diversity of prayers can be grouped into five principal types: invective, supplication (including intercession on somebody’s behalf), penitence, thanksgiving, and praise. Those are the prayer intentions explored in Kruglov’s and Kravtsov’s poetry, with the addition of elements typical of contemporary as well as folk poetry (a stream of consciousness, a counting rhyme, intertextual references, a lyrical hero in a particular role, a civically-minded lyrical subject, etc.). Razumov finds that Kruglov extends the limits of the genre convention, whereas Kravtsov appears to transcend them. This difference notwithstanding, both poets write at the confluence of literary and liturgical traditions and undoubtedly enrich the tuning and intonation of modern poetry.","PeriodicalId":52245,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Literatury","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Literatury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2024-1-98-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article undertakes a comparative study of the lyrical prayer poetry authored by K. Kravtsov and S. Kruglov, both ordained priests as well as poets and each offering a personal interpretation of the canon of prayer, transforming it into a unique poetic genre. Going into the history of the phenomenon, V. Razumov provides a classification of the prayer genres proper, noting that the diversity of prayers can be grouped into five principal types: invective, supplication (including intercession on somebody’s behalf), penitence, thanksgiving, and praise. Those are the prayer intentions explored in Kruglov’s and Kravtsov’s poetry, with the addition of elements typical of contemporary as well as folk poetry (a stream of consciousness, a counting rhyme, intertextual references, a lyrical hero in a particular role, a civically-minded lyrical subject, etc.). Razumov finds that Kruglov extends the limits of the genre convention, whereas Kravtsov appears to transcend them. This difference notwithstanding, both poets write at the confluence of literary and liturgical traditions and undoubtedly enrich the tuning and intonation of modern poetry.
文章对 K. Kravtsov 和 S. Kruglov 创作的抒情祈祷诗歌进行了比较研究,他们既是牧师,也是诗人,各自对祈祷文进行了个人解读,并将其转化为一种独特的诗歌体裁。拉祖莫夫(V. Razumov)对这一现象的历史进行了研究,并对祈祷文的体裁进行了分类,指出祈祷文的多样性可归纳为五种主要类型:谩骂、祈求(包括为他人代祷)、忏悔、感恩和赞美。这些就是克鲁格洛夫和克拉夫佐夫诗歌中探讨的祈祷意向,同时还加入了当代诗歌和民间诗歌的典型元素(意识流、数韵、互文引用、特定角色的抒情主人公、具有公民意识的抒情主题等)。拉祖莫夫发现,克鲁格洛夫扩大了体裁传统的限制,而克拉夫佐夫似乎超越了这些限制。尽管存在这种差异,但两位诗人都在文学和礼仪传统的交汇处写作,无疑丰富了现代诗歌的调性和音调。