Walking Toward the Demonumentalization of Qualitative Research: A Collaborative Autoethnography Account While Producing an Educational Podcast

Carmen Helena Guerrero Nieto, Á. Quintero-Polo
{"title":"Walking Toward the Demonumentalization of Qualitative Research: A Collaborative Autoethnography Account While Producing an Educational Podcast","authors":"Carmen Helena Guerrero Nieto, Á. Quintero-Polo","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how two teacher educators, as researchers and as research teachers, engaged in a collaborative interpretation of their autoethnographies about questioning an instrumentalist and positivist research culture in the field of English Language Teaching (ELT). The autoethnographies simultaneously emerged from the research activities related to the production of a bilingual podcast named “Conversing about \"Investigación Cualitativa.” Specifically, the authors conducted a qualitative study of autoethnographic and collaborative nature while working on their podcast. The data were individual written retrospective accounts, which were shared, discussed, and interpreted in online live meetings. The outcomes of the study were encapsulated in a major theme called Qualitative research: The path traveled from dogma to critical awareness, and three subsidiary themes named Questioning the culture of scientificity from our research experiences; Adopting a critical perspective (but still teaching by the book); and Empowering ourselves as teachers and as research teachers. Overall, this study emphasized a questioning attitude toward building a critical perspective from which examine alternatives to demonumentalize qualitative research without falling into extremes. Thus, it contributes to finding a balance between dogma and skepticism through a dialogue between local and global research agendas.","PeriodicalId":510558,"journal":{"name":"The Qualitative Report","volume":"72 7-8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Qualitative Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines how two teacher educators, as researchers and as research teachers, engaged in a collaborative interpretation of their autoethnographies about questioning an instrumentalist and positivist research culture in the field of English Language Teaching (ELT). The autoethnographies simultaneously emerged from the research activities related to the production of a bilingual podcast named “Conversing about "Investigación Cualitativa.” Specifically, the authors conducted a qualitative study of autoethnographic and collaborative nature while working on their podcast. The data were individual written retrospective accounts, which were shared, discussed, and interpreted in online live meetings. The outcomes of the study were encapsulated in a major theme called Qualitative research: The path traveled from dogma to critical awareness, and three subsidiary themes named Questioning the culture of scientificity from our research experiences; Adopting a critical perspective (but still teaching by the book); and Empowering ourselves as teachers and as research teachers. Overall, this study emphasized a questioning attitude toward building a critical perspective from which examine alternatives to demonumentalize qualitative research without falling into extremes. Thus, it contributes to finding a balance between dogma and skepticism through a dialogue between local and global research agendas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向定性研究的符号化:制作教育播客时的合作自述
本文探讨了两位教师教育工作者作为研究者和研究型教师,如何通过合作阐释他们的自述,对英语语言教学(ELT)领域的工具主义和实证主义研究文化提出质疑。这些自述同时产生于与制作双语播客 "对话 "Investigación Cualitativa "有关的研究活动。具体而言,作者在制作播客的过程中开展了一项具有自述和协作性质的定性研究。数据是个人的书面回顾性叙述,通过在线直播会议进行分享、讨论和解释。研究成果被概括为一个名为 "定性研究 "的重要主题:从教条到批判意识之路",以及三个次主题,分别是 "从我们的研究经历中质疑科学性文化"、"采用批判性视角(但仍照本宣科)"和 "增强我们作为教师和研究型教师的能力"。总之,本研究强调以质疑的态度来建立批判性视角,并从这一视角来审视将定性研究妖魔化的替代方案,同时又不走极端。因此,这项研究有助于通过本地和全球研究议程之间的对话,在教条主义和怀疑主义之间找到平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Concept of an Independent Curriculum with an Agrarian Insight in Early Childhood: Perspectives of Indonesian Teachers “Understand What the Feelings of the Student Must Be:” Newcomer Youths’ High School Integration Experiences “I know how much he cares for our learning”: Moral Life in University ELT Classrooms Poetry in Teaching & Learning Qualitative Research Towards a Versatile and Impactful Qualitative Research Paradigm: A Comprehensive Guide to Grounded Theory for Organizational Researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1