Intensidad de colaboración interprofesional y factores relacionados en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. Un estudio descriptivo de tipo transversal con enfoque analítico

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING Enfermeria Intensiva Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.enfi.2023.10.002
{"title":"Intensidad de colaboración interprofesional y factores relacionados en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. Un estudio descriptivo de tipo transversal con enfoque analítico","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enfi.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the Intensity of Collaboration between the intensive care professionals of a third level hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Descriptive cross-sectional study with an analytical approach. Setting: 6 intensive care units of a third level hospital. Sample: nurses and doctors. Consecutive type non-probabilistic sampling. Data collection: sociodemographic, economic, motivation and professional satisfaction variables, and the intensity of collaboration using the «Scale of Intensity of Interprofessional Collaboration in Health».</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 102 health professionals (91 nurses and 11 doctors) were included. The mean overall Intensity of Collaboration (IoC) was moderate. Men showed higher scores in all factors (p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0,05). The IoC global score was higher in the group of professionals with ≤<!--> <!-->10 years of experience (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0,043) and those who were highly satisfied with the profession (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0,037). Physicians presented higher scores in the global IdC (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0,037) and in the Collaboration mean (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0,020) independently in the multivariate models. A negative linear relationship (rho: -0,202, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0,042) was observed between age and the overall IoC score. Professionals aged ≤<!--> <!-->30 years reported a higher perception of Shared Activities (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0,031). Negative linear relationships were observed between years of experience and total IoC score (rho: -0,202, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0,042) and patients’ Perception score (rho: -0.241, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.015). The research activity also showed to be a variable related to a greater degree of Collaboration at a global level and in some of the factors (p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0,05). The scale of IoC obtained a Cronbach's α of 0,9.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The intensity of interprofessional collaboration in ICUs is moderate. Professionals with experience of ≤<!--> <!-->10 years, a higher level of satisfaction and participation in research activities show a greater intensity of collaboration. Doctors perceive collaboration more intensely than nurses. All factors contribute equally to the internal consistency of the questionnaire.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43993,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Intensiva","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 188-200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239923000901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine the Intensity of Collaboration between the intensive care professionals of a third level hospital.

Method

Descriptive cross-sectional study with an analytical approach. Setting: 6 intensive care units of a third level hospital. Sample: nurses and doctors. Consecutive type non-probabilistic sampling. Data collection: sociodemographic, economic, motivation and professional satisfaction variables, and the intensity of collaboration using the «Scale of Intensity of Interprofessional Collaboration in Health».

Results

A total of 102 health professionals (91 nurses and 11 doctors) were included. The mean overall Intensity of Collaboration (IoC) was moderate. Men showed higher scores in all factors (p < 0,05). The IoC global score was higher in the group of professionals with ≤ 10 years of experience (p = 0,043) and those who were highly satisfied with the profession (p = 0,037). Physicians presented higher scores in the global IdC (p = 0,037) and in the Collaboration mean (p = 0,020) independently in the multivariate models. A negative linear relationship (rho: -0,202, p = 0,042) was observed between age and the overall IoC score. Professionals aged ≤ 30 years reported a higher perception of Shared Activities (p = 0,031). Negative linear relationships were observed between years of experience and total IoC score (rho: -0,202, p = 0,042) and patients’ Perception score (rho: -0.241, p = 0.015). The research activity also showed to be a variable related to a greater degree of Collaboration at a global level and in some of the factors (p < 0,05). The scale of IoC obtained a Cronbach's α of 0,9.

Conclusions

The intensity of interprofessional collaboration in ICUs is moderate. Professionals with experience of ≤ 10 years, a higher level of satisfaction and participation in research activities show a greater intensity of collaboration. Doctors perceive collaboration more intensely than nurses. All factors contribute equally to the internal consistency of the questionnaire.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护病房专业间合作的强度及相关因素。采用分析方法进行的横断面描述性研究。
目标确定一家三级医院重症监护专业人员之间的合作强度。 方法采用分析方法进行描述性横断面研究。地点一家三级医院的 6 个重症监护室。样本:护士和医生。连续型非概率抽样。数据收集:社会人口学、经济、动机和职业满意度变量,以及使用 "卫生领域专业间合作强度量表 "的合作强度。总体合作强度(IoC)的平均值为中等。男性在所有因素中得分更高(p < 0,05)。工作经验≤ 10 年的专业人员(p = 0,043)和对职业高度满意的专业人员(p = 0,037)的 IoC 总体得分更高。在多变量模型中,医生在总体 IdC(p = 0,037)和协作平均值(p = 0,020)中的得分较高。年龄与 IoC 总分之间呈负线性关系(rho:-0,202,p = 0,042)。年龄小于 30 岁的专业人员对 "共享活动 "的感知更高(p = 0,031)。在工作年限与 IoC 总分(rho:-0,202,p = 0,042)和患者感知分值(rho:-0.241,p = 0.015)之间观察到负线性关系。研究活动也表明,在整体层面和某些因素中,研究活动是一个与更大程度的协作相关的变量(p < 0,05)。IoC 量表的 Cronbach's α 值为 0.9。工作经验≤ 10 年、满意度较高且参与研究活动的专业人员表现出更高的合作强度。医生比护士更重视合作。所有因素都对问卷的内部一致性做出了同等贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Enfermería Intensiva es el medio de comunicación por antonomasia para todos los profesionales de enfermería españoles que desarrollan su actividad profesional en las unidades de cuidados intensivos o en cualquier otro lugar donde se atiende al paciente crítico. Enfermería Intensiva publica cuatro números al año, cuyos temas son específicos para la enfermería de cuidados intensivos. Es la única publicación en español con carácter nacional y está indexada en prestigiosas bases de datos como International Nursing Index, MEDLINE, Índice de Enfermería, Cuiden, Índice Médico Español, Toxline, etc.
期刊最新文献
Punción ecoguiada versus técnica tradicional para la extracción de gasometrías arteriales en adultos: una revisión sistemática Perspectiva de género en la realización de la higiene en cuidados intensivos cardiológicos Barriers to reporting adverse events from the perspective of ICU nurses: A mixed-method study Drug interactions in a coronary care unit: Adversity or therapeutic success? Utilización de un sistema de valoración para la asignación de recurso humano en el transporte intrahospitalario del paciente ingresado en una unidad de cuidados intensivos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1