Assessment of the readability of online orthodontic educational resources related to ‘orthodontic treatment’: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Seminars in Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1053/j.sodo.2024.01.015
{"title":"Assessment of the readability of online orthodontic educational resources related to ‘orthodontic treatment’: A cross-sectional study","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.sodo.2024.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In the digital age, the internet has become a primary source for patient education in orthodontics. However, the effectiveness of these online resources largely depends on their readability and comprehensibility. The main aim of our research was to assess the readability of the ten most popular websites dedicated to orthodontic treatment. Additionally, we aimed to ascertain the educational level required to comprehend the information provided on these websites.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>The selection of the top 10 patient-centric English language websites was conducted through a search query for \"orthodontic treatment\" on the Google Chrome browser. The assessment of text readability was conducted by employing six different readability indices, The readability formulas website (https://readabilityformulas.com) was utilized as a resource for this purpose.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The researchers calculated the average Flesch Reading Ease index score to be 58.60, with a standard deviation of 10.17. According to GFI, these websites necessitate an average of 12.52 years of formal education, with a standard variation of 2.15, in order to aid understanding. The mean grade level was found to be 10.40, with a standard deviation of 1.90.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our research indicates that internet resources are crucial in orthodontic education for Generation Z, serving as a platform for efficient learning, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic in creating a general knowledge a level of moderate-complexity. Orthodontic professionals and website developers should be encouraged to consider the readability of their content to ensure it meets the needs of a diverse patient population. However, the utilization of internet information should not be regarded as a comprehensive replacement for a comprehensive treatment process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48688,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Orthodontics","volume":"30 4","pages":"Pages 463-468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874624000161/pdfft?md5=78fe29127217da7136c0c6d054943f3c&pid=1-s2.0-S1073874624000161-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874624000161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

In the digital age, the internet has become a primary source for patient education in orthodontics. However, the effectiveness of these online resources largely depends on their readability and comprehensibility. The main aim of our research was to assess the readability of the ten most popular websites dedicated to orthodontic treatment. Additionally, we aimed to ascertain the educational level required to comprehend the information provided on these websites.

Materials and Methods

The selection of the top 10 patient-centric English language websites was conducted through a search query for "orthodontic treatment" on the Google Chrome browser. The assessment of text readability was conducted by employing six different readability indices, The readability formulas website (https://readabilityformulas.com) was utilized as a resource for this purpose.

Results

The researchers calculated the average Flesch Reading Ease index score to be 58.60, with a standard deviation of 10.17. According to GFI, these websites necessitate an average of 12.52 years of formal education, with a standard variation of 2.15, in order to aid understanding. The mean grade level was found to be 10.40, with a standard deviation of 1.90.

Conclusion

Our research indicates that internet resources are crucial in orthodontic education for Generation Z, serving as a platform for efficient learning, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic in creating a general knowledge a level of moderate-complexity. Orthodontic professionals and website developers should be encouraged to consider the readability of their content to ensure it meets the needs of a diverse patient population. However, the utilization of internet information should not be regarded as a comprehensive replacement for a comprehensive treatment process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估与 "正畸治疗 "相关的在线正畸教育资源的可读性:横断面研究
目标在数字化时代,互联网已成为正畸学患者教育的主要来源。然而,这些在线资源的有效性在很大程度上取决于其可读性和可理解性。我们研究的主要目的是评估十个最受欢迎的正畸治疗网站的可读性。材料和方法通过在谷歌 Chrome 浏览器上搜索 "正畸治疗",选出了 10 大以患者为中心的英文网站。研究人员通过使用六种不同的可读性指数对文本的可读性进行了评估,并将可读性公式网站(https://readabilityformulas.com)作为评估资源。结果研究人员计算出的弗莱什阅读轻松指数平均得分为 58.60,标准差为 10.17。根据 GFI,这些网站需要平均 12.52 年的正规教育(标准差为 2.15)才能帮助理解。我们的研究表明,互联网资源对于 Z 世代的正畸教育至关重要,它是一个高效学习的平台,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行期间,它能创造出中等复杂程度的常识。应鼓励正畸专业人员和网站开发人员考虑其内容的可读性,以确保其满足不同患者群体的需求。然而,互联网信息的利用不应被视为全面治疗过程的全面替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Orthodontics
Seminars in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
10 days
期刊介绍: Each issue provides up-to-date, state-of-the-art information on a single topic in orthodontics. Readers are kept abreast of the latest innovations, research findings, clinical applications and clinical methods. Collection of the issues will provide invaluable reference material for present and future review.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of geometric changes in basal arch form after maxillary expansion between pure bone-borne and tissue-bone-borne appliance Assessment of the readability of online orthodontic educational resources related to ‘orthodontic treatment’: A cross-sectional study Orthodontic education in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: Overview of programs and challenges The applications of digital technology in postgraduate orthodontic education Shaping the research agenda for dental sleep-disordered breathing education in orthodontic residency programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1