The 2022 Starlink Geomagnetic Storms: Global Thermospheric Response to a High‐Latitude Ionospheric Driver

Space Weather Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1029/2023sw003748
D. Billett, Kian Sartipzadeh, M. F. Ivarsen, Elisabetta Iorfida, E. Doornbos, Emine Ceren, Kalafatoglu Eyig¨uler, K. Pandey, Kathryn A McWilliams, M. F. Ivarsen, E. C. K. Eyiguler
{"title":"The 2022 Starlink Geomagnetic Storms: Global Thermospheric Response to a High‐Latitude Ionospheric Driver","authors":"D. Billett, Kian Sartipzadeh, M. F. Ivarsen, Elisabetta Iorfida, E. Doornbos, Emine Ceren, Kalafatoglu Eyig¨uler, K. Pandey, Kathryn A McWilliams, M. F. Ivarsen, E. C. K. Eyiguler","doi":"10.1029/2023sw003748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we present ionospheric observations of field‐aligned currents from AMPERE and the ESA Swarm A satellite, in conjunction with high‐resolution thermospheric density measurements from accelerometers on board Swarm C and GRACE‐FO, for the third and 4 February 2022 geomagnetic storms that led to the loss of 38 Starlink internet satellites. We study the global storm time response of the thermospheric density enhancements, including their decay and latitudinal distribution. We find that the thermospheric density enhances globally in response to high‐latitude energy input from the magnetosphere‐solar wind system and takes at least a full day to recover to pre‐storm density levels. We also find that the greatest density perturbations occur at polar latitudes consistent with the magnetosphere‐ionosphere dayside cusp, and that there appeared to be a saturation of the thermospheric density during the geomagnetic storm on the fourth. Our results highlight the critical importance of high‐latitude ionospheric observations when diagnosing potentially hazardous conditions for low‐Earth‐orbit satellites.","PeriodicalId":510519,"journal":{"name":"Space Weather","volume":"56 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space Weather","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023sw003748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we present ionospheric observations of field‐aligned currents from AMPERE and the ESA Swarm A satellite, in conjunction with high‐resolution thermospheric density measurements from accelerometers on board Swarm C and GRACE‐FO, for the third and 4 February 2022 geomagnetic storms that led to the loss of 38 Starlink internet satellites. We study the global storm time response of the thermospheric density enhancements, including their decay and latitudinal distribution. We find that the thermospheric density enhances globally in response to high‐latitude energy input from the magnetosphere‐solar wind system and takes at least a full day to recover to pre‐storm density levels. We also find that the greatest density perturbations occur at polar latitudes consistent with the magnetosphere‐ionosphere dayside cusp, and that there appeared to be a saturation of the thermospheric density during the geomagnetic storm on the fourth. Our results highlight the critical importance of high‐latitude ionospheric observations when diagnosing potentially hazardous conditions for low‐Earth‐orbit satellites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2022 年星链地磁风暴:全球热层对高纬度电离层驱动因素的响应
在本研究中,我们介绍了 2022 年 2 月 3 日和 4 日导致 38 颗 Starlink 互联网卫星失 踪的地磁暴期间,AMPERE 和欧空局 Swarm A 卫星对电离层场对准电流的观测,以 及 Swarm C 和 GRACE-FO 上的加速计对热层密度的高分辨率测量。我们研究了热层密度增强的全球风暴时间响应,包括其衰减和纬度分布。我们发现,热层密度会随着磁层-太阳风系统的高纬度能量输入而在全球范围内增强,至少需要一整天的时间才能恢复到风暴前的密度水平。我们还发现,最大的密度扰动发生在极地纬度,与磁层-电离层日侧顶点一致,而且在第四日地磁暴期间热层密度似乎达到了饱和。我们的结果突出表明,高纬度电离层观测在诊断低地轨道卫星的潜在危险状况时至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inner Radiation Belt Simulations During the Successive Geomagnetic Storm Event of February 2022 Modeling GIC in the Southern South Island of Aotearoa New Zealand Using Magnetotelluric Data MAOOA‐Residual‐Attention‐BiConvLSTM: An Automated Deep Learning Framework for Global TEC Map Prediction Enhanced Sporadic E Layer and Its Perturbations During the 2022 Hunga Volcanic Eruption Updating Measures of CME Arrival Time Errors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1