Ethical considerations of generative AI-enabled human resource management

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Organizational Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101032
Pierre Andrieux , Richard D. Johnson , Jalal Sarabadani , Craig Van Slyke
{"title":"Ethical considerations of generative AI-enabled human resource management","authors":"Pierre Andrieux ,&nbsp;Richard D. Johnson ,&nbsp;Jalal Sarabadani ,&nbsp;Craig Van Slyke","doi":"10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines critical ethical considerations linked to making human resources management (HRM) decisions based on the potential capabilities (affordances) offered by generative artificial intelligence (GAI). We first provide a broad overview of the <em>status quo</em> surrounding the use of GAI in the HRM context. Then, we introduce the concept of “affordance” and explain how it provides a useful perspective for human resource (HR) managers to use when evaluating potential benefits and/or harm resulting from the implementation of a potential GAI-based capability to support HRM processes decisions. We discuss concrete examples of how GAI HRM affordances could be implemented in different HRM functions and the ethical questions that arise from their use. Finally, we present an ethics-based framework, the Two-Rule Method, along with ethics-specific recommendations to guide HR managers through the complex issues that arise because of the use of GAI-enabled HR tools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48061,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Dynamics","volume":"53 1","pages":"Article 101032"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261624000056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines critical ethical considerations linked to making human resources management (HRM) decisions based on the potential capabilities (affordances) offered by generative artificial intelligence (GAI). We first provide a broad overview of the status quo surrounding the use of GAI in the HRM context. Then, we introduce the concept of “affordance” and explain how it provides a useful perspective for human resource (HR) managers to use when evaluating potential benefits and/or harm resulting from the implementation of a potential GAI-based capability to support HRM processes decisions. We discuss concrete examples of how GAI HRM affordances could be implemented in different HRM functions and the ethical questions that arise from their use. Finally, we present an ethics-based framework, the Two-Rule Method, along with ethics-specific recommendations to guide HR managers through the complex issues that arise because of the use of GAI-enabled HR tools.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能生成式人力资源管理的伦理考量
本文探讨了与基于生成式人工智能(GAI)提供的潜在能力(可负担性)做出人力资源管理(HRM)决策相关的重要伦理考虑因素。我们首先概述了在人力资源管理中使用 GAI 的现状。然后,我们介绍 "承受能力 "的概念,并解释它如何为人力资源(HR)管理者提供一个有用的视角,用于评估实施基于生成式人工智能的潜在能力以支持人力资源管理流程决策所带来的潜在利益和/或损害。我们讨论了如何在不同的人力资源管理职能中实施GAI人力资源管理能力的具体实例,以及使用这些能力所产生的伦理问题。最后,我们提出了一个基于伦理的框架--"双规则法",以及针对伦理的建议,以指导人力资源管理者解决因使用GAI支持的人力资源工具而产生的复杂问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Organizational Dynamics domain is primarily organizational behavior and development and secondarily, HRM and strategic management. The objective is to link leading-edge thought and research with management practice. Organizational Dynamics publishes articles that embody both theoretical and practical content, showing how research findings can help deal more effectively with the dynamics of organizational life.
期刊最新文献
Trio of human, old and new copilots: Collaborative accountability of human, manuals/standards, and artificial intelligence (AI) Positive mindset: PsyCap’s roles in PERMA+4 and positive organizational psychology, behavior, and scholarship 2.0 Design thinking: Executing your organization's commitment to customer centricity Editorial Board Often wrong, never in doubt: Mitigating leadership overconfidence in decision-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1