Loneliness improved by either telephone or video communications in community-dwelling older adults

Justin T Mierzwicki, Joshua Kline, Brooke Schach, Lauren Vandenberg
{"title":"Loneliness improved by either telephone or video communications in community-dwelling older adults","authors":"Justin T Mierzwicki,&nbsp;Joshua Kline,&nbsp;Brooke Schach,&nbsp;Lauren Vandenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.aggp.2024.100011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose/hypothesis</h3><p>Loneliness and social isolation increase the risk of morbidity, and mortality. Various interventions, with and without use of technology, have improved older adults’ loneliness. The purpose of the study was to compare the impact of telephone versus video communications on perceived loneliness in older adults. It was hypothesized that video communication would result in improved outcomes compared to telephone communication.</p></div><div><h3>Materials/methods</h3><p>Eighteen hundred flyers were distributed among continuing care communities, meals on wheels, and snowball sampling was encouraged. Sixty-five potential participants responded, 44 were eligible to participate after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants were assigned into a telephone interaction group (<em>n</em> = 17), a video interaction group (<em>n</em> = 14), or control group (<em>n</em> = 13). Study duration was 8 weeks and consisted of once weekly 45 to 60-minute sessions. Pre-post-intervention outcome measures included UCLA Loneliness Scales (3 and 20-item), and the Social Frailty Scale (SFS). Data analyses were performed with One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post hoc tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One-way ANOVA demonstrated statistically significant differences between groups (<em>p</em>=.003 UCLA 3, <em>p</em>&lt;.001 UCLA 20, <em>p</em>&lt;.001 SFS) with large effect sizes (eta<sup>2</sup>= 0.251 UCLA3, 0.410 UCLA20, 0.314 SFS). Tukey's HSD demonstrates statistically significant differences between intervention groups and the control group for each dependent variable (<em>p</em>&lt;.011) but identified no significant differences between intervention groups for any dependent variables (<em>p</em>&gt;.283).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Health care professionals can improve loneliness and social isolation through low-tech telephone and video-based communication interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100119,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100011"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307824000080/pdfft?md5=c39ab3956438fb2b4747271fe49abef5&pid=1-s2.0-S2950307824000080-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307824000080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/hypothesis

Loneliness and social isolation increase the risk of morbidity, and mortality. Various interventions, with and without use of technology, have improved older adults’ loneliness. The purpose of the study was to compare the impact of telephone versus video communications on perceived loneliness in older adults. It was hypothesized that video communication would result in improved outcomes compared to telephone communication.

Materials/methods

Eighteen hundred flyers were distributed among continuing care communities, meals on wheels, and snowball sampling was encouraged. Sixty-five potential participants responded, 44 were eligible to participate after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants were assigned into a telephone interaction group (n = 17), a video interaction group (n = 14), or control group (n = 13). Study duration was 8 weeks and consisted of once weekly 45 to 60-minute sessions. Pre-post-intervention outcome measures included UCLA Loneliness Scales (3 and 20-item), and the Social Frailty Scale (SFS). Data analyses were performed with One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post hoc tests.

Results

One-way ANOVA demonstrated statistically significant differences between groups (p=.003 UCLA 3, p<.001 UCLA 20, p<.001 SFS) with large effect sizes (eta2= 0.251 UCLA3, 0.410 UCLA20, 0.314 SFS). Tukey's HSD demonstrates statistically significant differences between intervention groups and the control group for each dependent variable (p<.011) but identified no significant differences between intervention groups for any dependent variables (p>.283).

Conclusion

Health care professionals can improve loneliness and social isolation through low-tech telephone and video-based communication interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过电话或视频通信改善居住在社区的老年人的孤独感
目的/假设孤独和社会隔离会增加发病和死亡的风险。使用或不使用技术的各种干预措施都能改善老年人的孤独感。本研究旨在比较电话和视频通讯对老年人孤独感的影响。材料/方法:在持续护理社区和轮椅上的就餐场所分发了 1800 份传单,并鼓励滚雪球式抽样。65 名潜在参与者做出了回应,其中 44 人符合纳入和排除标准。参与者被分配到电话互动组(17 人)、视频互动组(14 人)或对照组(13 人)。研究持续时间为 8 周,每周一次,每次 45 到 60 分钟。干预前和干预后的结果测量包括加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表(3 项和 20 项)和社会脆弱性量表(SFS)。数据分析采用单向方差分析和 Tukey's HSD 后设检验。结果单向方差分析显示,组间差异具有统计学意义(p=.003 UCLA 3,p<.001 UCLA 20,p<.001 SFS),且效应大小较大(eta2= 0.251 UCLA3,0.410 UCLA20,0.314 SFS)。Tukey的HSD表明,干预组与对照组在每个因变量上都存在统计学上的显著差异(p< .011),但发现干预组之间在任何因变量上都没有显著差异(p> .283)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Negative attitudes toward the majority and perceived hostile and modern prejudices: Focus on older adults and people with disabilities Cognitive decline gap between male and female in Indian context: Examining the contribution of underlying factors using non-linear decomposition analysis Do healthy older adults use SNS? Focus on LINE, Facebook, Twitter (now X), and Instagram “There's a lot of factors”: Researcher reflections on using I-poetry to empathetically understand vaccine hesitant individuals The link between periodontitis and Alzheimer's disease – Brunei context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1