Synergistic effects of anthropogenic disturbances on giant pandas

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Journal of Wildlife Management Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1002/jwmg.22555
Guanhua Pu, Bin Feng, Yaohua Huang, Jindong Zhang, Huakang Yin, Shuai Yang, Liqiang Fu, Caiquan Zhou, Wenke Bai
{"title":"Synergistic effects of anthropogenic disturbances on giant pandas","authors":"Guanhua Pu,&nbsp;Bin Feng,&nbsp;Yaohua Huang,&nbsp;Jindong Zhang,&nbsp;Huakang Yin,&nbsp;Shuai Yang,&nbsp;Liqiang Fu,&nbsp;Caiquan Zhou,&nbsp;Wenke Bai","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Livestock grazing and the collection of bamboo shoots are the main threats to giant panda (<i>Ailuropoda melanoleuca</i>) habitat in the Liangshan Mountains in China. It is important to clarify the effect of these disturbances to the giant panda to formulate targeted management policies. Based on species distribution models and daily activity models, we investigated the effects of livestock grazing and bamboo shoot collection on giant pandas from May 2021 to July 2022. Our results indicated the giant panda's suitable habitat in the reserve covered 51.83 km<sup>2</sup> (15.02% of the reserve area). Grazing and bamboo shoot collection led to losses of 19.08 km<sup>2</sup> and 7.68 km<sup>2</sup> of suitable habitat, respectively. Together, the 2 activities resulted in a loss of 28.35 km<sup>2</sup> of suitable habitat, which was more than half of the area of panda habitat. The areas of suitable habitat for giant pandas significantly overlapped with the areas affected by both disturbances. Giant pandas did not show significant differences in daily activity rhythms under a single disturbance, but the daily activity rhythms of giant pandas differed when we compared the area combining the 2 disturbances with the undisturbed area. Our study reveals that the anthropogenic disturbances in the reserve have varying effects on the suitable habitat range and daily activity rhythm of giant pandas and evidence of a synergistic effect. Therefore, when formulating relevant conservation policies, it is important to fully evaluate the extent and characteristics of anthropogenic disturbances in shaping the population distribution and habitat preferences of the giant panda and other wildlife to enhance the efficacy of conservation management practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Livestock grazing and the collection of bamboo shoots are the main threats to giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) habitat in the Liangshan Mountains in China. It is important to clarify the effect of these disturbances to the giant panda to formulate targeted management policies. Based on species distribution models and daily activity models, we investigated the effects of livestock grazing and bamboo shoot collection on giant pandas from May 2021 to July 2022. Our results indicated the giant panda's suitable habitat in the reserve covered 51.83 km2 (15.02% of the reserve area). Grazing and bamboo shoot collection led to losses of 19.08 km2 and 7.68 km2 of suitable habitat, respectively. Together, the 2 activities resulted in a loss of 28.35 km2 of suitable habitat, which was more than half of the area of panda habitat. The areas of suitable habitat for giant pandas significantly overlapped with the areas affected by both disturbances. Giant pandas did not show significant differences in daily activity rhythms under a single disturbance, but the daily activity rhythms of giant pandas differed when we compared the area combining the 2 disturbances with the undisturbed area. Our study reveals that the anthropogenic disturbances in the reserve have varying effects on the suitable habitat range and daily activity rhythm of giant pandas and evidence of a synergistic effect. Therefore, when formulating relevant conservation policies, it is important to fully evaluate the extent and characteristics of anthropogenic disturbances in shaping the population distribution and habitat preferences of the giant panda and other wildlife to enhance the efficacy of conservation management practices.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人为干扰对大熊猫的协同效应
放牧和采笋是中国凉山大熊猫栖息地面临的主要威胁。厘清这些干扰对大熊猫的影响对制定有针对性的管理政策非常重要。基于物种分布模型和日常活动模型,我们研究了2021年5月至2022年7月期间放牧和采笋对大熊猫的影响。结果表明,大熊猫在保护区内的适宜栖息地面积为 51.83 平方公里(占保护区面积的 15.02%)。放牧和竹笋采集分别导致 19.08 平方公里和 7.68 平方公里适宜栖息地的损失。这两项活动共导致 28.35 平方公里适宜栖息地的损失,占大熊猫栖息地面积的一半以上。大熊猫的适宜栖息地区域与受两次干扰影响的区域明显重叠。大熊猫在单一干扰下的日活动节律没有明显差异,但当我们将两种干扰的综合区与未受干扰区进行比较时,大熊猫的日活动节律出现了差异。我们的研究表明,保护区内的人为干扰对大熊猫的适宜栖息地范围和日活动节律有不同程度的影响,并存在协同效应。因此,在制定相关保护政策时,必须充分评估人为干扰对大熊猫及其他野生动物种群分布和栖息地偏好的影响程度和特征,以提高保护管理措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
期刊最新文献
Free‐roaming horses exceeding appropriate management levels affect multiple vital rates in greater sage‐grouse Sexual Segregation in Ungulates: Ecology, Behavior, and ConservationBy R. TerryBowyer, Baltimore, Maryland: John Hopkins University Press. 2022. pp. 200. $74.99 (hardcover). ISBN: 9781421445069 Efficacy of non‐lead ammunition distribution programs to offset fatalities of golden eagles in southeast Wyoming Identifying temperature refuges in Utah using temperature, biota, and habitat data Annual variation in attribute importance to upland game hunter satisfaction in Nebraska
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1