首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Wildlife Management最新文献

英文 中文
Issue Information - Cover 发行信息 - 封面
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-15 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22601
{"title":"Issue Information - Cover","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22601","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22601","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22601","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142861128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Wolf density and predation patterns in the Canadian High Arctic 加拿大北极高地的狼密度和捕食模式
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22671
Morgan L. Anderson, H. Dean Cluff, L. David Mech, Daniel R. MacNulty

The Arctic wolf (Canis lupus arctos) is a predator of muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus), Arctic hares (Lepus arcticus), and endangered Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) in the Canadian High Arctic. Although Arctic wolves potentially affect the dynamics of muskoxen and Peary caribou populations, knowledge about their abundance, distribution, and predation patterns is limited. Inuit and Inuvialuit communities value these species for sociocultural and subsistence reasons, and community members are concerned about how interactions among these species and their environment may change in a warming, unpredictable Arctic. We conducted a study from 2014–2018 of wolves in the rolling tundra of central Ellesmere Island (Fosheim Peninsula) and eastern Axel Heiberg Island. This area supported relatively high densities of muskoxen and Arctic hares, and previously supported Peary caribou, although caribou were mostly absent in the area during our study. We deployed global positioning system (GPS) radio-collars on 10 adult wolves in 6 packs on Ellesmere and Axel Heiberg islands to describe wolf density and predation patterns. Wolves were neither nomadic nor migratory; they remained on territories year-round, with summer densities of 2.5–8.0 adult wolves/1,000 km2 and 3.7–10.4 wolves/1,000 km2 including pups. Based on a ground search of 312 of 868 location clusters over a 340-day period, wolves in a focal study pack killed approximately 0.12 muskoxen/day, equivalent to a predation rate of 5.5–17.0% of the estimated muskox population (older than 10 months old). This predation rate is likely sustainable given that calves and yearlings rather than reproductive adults comprised most documented kills, and that muskox populations can increase at rates up to 20%. The kill rate for this pack also implied a biomass intake deficit of 0.82–1.63 kg/wolf/day that could have been offset by each wolf consuming 115–228 Arctic hares annually. The decline of Peary caribou in the study area precluded any assessment of wolf predation influences on their population, but annual telemetry data confirming the year-round presence of a wolf–ungulate–hare system with relatively high wolf densities suggests that apparent competition could present a challenge to Peary caribou recovery efforts.

北极狼(Canis lupus arctos)是加拿大北极高地的麝牛(Ovibos moschatus),北极野兔(Lepus arcticus)和濒临灭绝的驯鹿(Rangifer tarandus pearyi)的掠食者。尽管北极狼可能影响麝牛和北美驯鹿种群的动态,但对它们的数量、分布和捕食模式的了解有限。因纽特人和Inuvialuit社区价值对社会文化和生存的原因,这些物种和社区成员都关心如何这些物种与环境之间的交互可能会改变在一个变暖,不可预知的北极。2014年至2018年,我们对埃尔斯米尔岛中部(Fosheim半岛)和阿克塞尔海伯格岛东部的滚动苔原上的狼进行了研究。该地区支持相对高密度的麝牛和北极野兔,并且以前支持Peary caribou,尽管在我们的研究期间该地区大多没有驯鹿。研究人员在埃尔斯米尔岛和阿克塞尔海伯格岛的6群10只成年狼身上安装了GPS无线电项圈,以描述狼的密度和捕食模式。狼既不是游牧的,也不是迁徙的;它们全年生活在领地上,夏季密度为2.5-8.0只成年狼/ 1000 km2, 3.7-10.4只狼/ 1000 km2(包括幼狼)。在340天的时间里,根据对868个地点群中的312个地点群的地面搜索,一个重点研究群中的狼每天杀死大约0.12头麝牛,相当于估计的麝牛种群(10个月以上)的5.5-17.0%的捕食率。这种捕食率可能是可持续的,因为记录在案的大多数杀戮是由小牛和一岁的幼崽而不是繁殖的成年动物构成的,而且麝牛的种群数量可以以高达20%的速度增长。这群狼的捕杀率也意味着每只狼每天的生物量摄入不足0.82-1.63公斤,这可以通过每只狼每年吃掉115-228只北极野兔来抵消。研究区域内驯鹿数量的减少使我们无法评估狼捕食对驯鹿数量的影响,但每年的遥测数据证实,狼-有蹄类-野兔系统全年存在,狼的密度相对较高,这表明明显的竞争可能对驯鹿的恢复工作构成挑战。
{"title":"Wolf density and predation patterns in the Canadian High Arctic","authors":"Morgan L. Anderson,&nbsp;H. Dean Cluff,&nbsp;L. David Mech,&nbsp;Daniel R. MacNulty","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22671","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22671","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Arctic wolf (<i>Canis lupus arctos</i>) is a predator of muskoxen (<i>Ovibos moschatus</i>), Arctic hares (<i>Lepus arcticus</i>), and endangered Peary caribou (<i>Rangifer tarandus pearyi</i>) in the Canadian High Arctic. Although Arctic wolves potentially affect the dynamics of muskoxen and Peary caribou populations, knowledge about their abundance, distribution, and predation patterns is limited. Inuit and Inuvialuit communities value these species for sociocultural and subsistence reasons, and community members are concerned about how interactions among these species and their environment may change in a warming, unpredictable Arctic. We conducted a study from 2014–2018 of wolves in the rolling tundra of central Ellesmere Island (Fosheim Peninsula) and eastern Axel Heiberg Island. This area supported relatively high densities of muskoxen and Arctic hares, and previously supported Peary caribou, although caribou were mostly absent in the area during our study. We deployed global positioning system (GPS) radio-collars on 10 adult wolves in 6 packs on Ellesmere and Axel Heiberg islands to describe wolf density and predation patterns. Wolves were neither nomadic nor migratory; they remained on territories year-round, with summer densities of 2.5–8.0 adult wolves/1,000 km<sup>2</sup> and 3.7–10.4 wolves/1,000 km<sup>2</sup> including pups. Based on a ground search of 312 of 868 location clusters over a 340-day period, wolves in a focal study pack killed approximately 0.12 muskoxen/day, equivalent to a predation rate of 5.5–17.0% of the estimated muskox population (older than 10 months old). This predation rate is likely sustainable given that calves and yearlings rather than reproductive adults comprised most documented kills, and that muskox populations can increase at rates up to 20%. The kill rate for this pack also implied a biomass intake deficit of 0.82–1.63 kg/wolf/day that could have been offset by each wolf consuming 115–228 Arctic hares annually. The decline of Peary caribou in the study area precluded any assessment of wolf predation influences on their population, but annual telemetry data confirming the year-round presence of a wolf–ungulate–hare system with relatively high wolf densities suggests that apparent competition could present a challenge to Peary caribou recovery efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142860054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the sustainability of Pacific walrus harvest in a changing environment 评估在不断变化的环境中捕捞太平洋海象的可持续性
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22686
Devin L. Johnson, Joseph M. Eisaguirre, Rebecca L. Taylor, Erik M. Andersen, Joel L. Garlich-Miller

Harvest sustainability is a primary goal of wildlife management and conservation, and in a changing world, it is increasingly important to consider environmental drivers of population dynamics alongside harvest in cohesive management plans. This is particularly pertinent for harvested species that acutely experience effects of climate change. The Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens), a crucial subsistence resource for Indigenous communities, is simultaneously subject to rapid habitat loss associated with diminishing sea ice and an increasing anthropogenic footprint in the Arctic. We developed a theta-logistic population modeling-management framework to evaluate various harvest scenarios combined with 4 potential climate and disturbance scenarios (ranging from optimistic to pessimistic, based largely on sea ice projections from general circulation models) to simulate Pacific walrus population dynamics to the end of the twenty-first century, focusing on the independent-aged female subset of the population. We considered 2 types of harvest strategies: 1) state-dependent harvest scenarios wherein we calculated harvest as a percentage of the population and updated annual harvests at set intervals as the population was reassessed, and 2) annually consistent harvest scenarios wherein annual harvest levels remain consistent into the future. All climate and disturbance scenarios indicated declines of varying severity in Pacific walrus abundance to the end of the twenty-first century, even in the absence of harvest. However, we found that a state-dependent annual harvest of 1.23% of the independent-aged female subset of the population (e.g., 1,280 independent-aged females harvested in 2020, similar to contemporary harvest levels) met our criterion for sustainability under all climate and disturbance scenarios, considering a medium risk tolerance level of 25%. This indicates that the present rate of Pacific walrus harvest is sustainable and will continue to be—provided the population is assessed at regular intervals and harvest is adapted to match changes in population dynamics. Our simulations indicate that a sustainable annually-consistent harvest is also possible but only at low levels if the population declines as expected. Applying a constant annual harvest of 1,280 independent-aged females failed to meet our criterion for sustainability under 3 of the 4 climate and disturbance scenarios we evaluated and had a higher probability of quasi-extinction than an equivalent state-dependent harvest scenario (1.23%). We highlight the importance of state-dependent management strategies and suggest our modeling framework is useful for managing harvest sustainability in a changing climate.

收获的可持续性是野生动物管理和保护的主要目标,在不断变化的世界中,在有凝聚力的管理计划中考虑种群动态和收获的环境驱动因素变得越来越重要。这对于受到气候变化严重影响的收获物种尤为重要。太平洋海象(Odobenus rosmarus divergens)是土著社区的重要生存资源,同时由于海冰的减少和北极地区人为足迹的增加,其栖息地正在迅速丧失。我们开发了一个种群模型-logistic管理框架,结合4种潜在的气候和干扰情景(从乐观到悲观,主要基于一般环流模型的海冰预测)来评估各种收获情景,以模拟太平洋海象种群动态到21世纪末,重点关注种群中独立年龄的雌性子集。我们考虑了两种类型的收获策略:1)依赖于状态的收获情景,其中我们计算收获量占人口的百分比,并在重新评估人口时以设定的间隔更新年收获量;2)每年一致的收获情景,其中每年的收获水平在未来保持一致。所有气候和干扰情景都表明,到21世纪末,即使在没有收获的情况下,太平洋海象的丰度也会出现不同程度的下降。然而,我们发现,在所有气候和干扰情景下,考虑到25%的中等风险承受水平,1.23%的独立年龄女性种群(例如,2020年收获1280名独立年龄女性,与当代收获水平相似)的国家依赖年采收量符合我们的可持续性标准。这表明,目前的太平洋海象捕捞率是可持续的,并将继续下去——只要定期对种群进行评估,并使捕捞量适应种群动态的变化。我们的模拟表明,如果人口如预期的那样下降,可持续的年度持续收获也是可能的,但只有在低水平上。在我们评估的4种气候和干扰情景中,有3种情景下,1,280只独立年龄雌性的恒定年采收未能满足我们的可持续性标准,并且与等效的状态依赖采收情景相比,其准灭绝概率更高(1.23%)。我们强调了依赖于状态的管理策略的重要性,并建议我们的建模框架有助于在气候变化的情况下管理收获的可持续性。
{"title":"Assessing the sustainability of Pacific walrus harvest in a changing environment","authors":"Devin L. Johnson,&nbsp;Joseph M. Eisaguirre,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Taylor,&nbsp;Erik M. Andersen,&nbsp;Joel L. Garlich-Miller","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22686","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22686","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Harvest sustainability is a primary goal of wildlife management and conservation, and in a changing world, it is increasingly important to consider environmental drivers of population dynamics alongside harvest in cohesive management plans. This is particularly pertinent for harvested species that acutely experience effects of climate change. The Pacific walrus (<i>Odobenus rosmarus divergens</i>), a crucial subsistence resource for Indigenous communities, is simultaneously subject to rapid habitat loss associated with diminishing sea ice and an increasing anthropogenic footprint in the Arctic. We developed a theta-logistic population modeling-management framework to evaluate various harvest scenarios combined with 4 potential climate and disturbance scenarios (ranging from optimistic to pessimistic, based largely on sea ice projections from general circulation models) to simulate Pacific walrus population dynamics to the end of the twenty-first century, focusing on the independent-aged female subset of the population. We considered 2 types of harvest strategies: 1) state-dependent harvest scenarios wherein we calculated harvest as a percentage of the population and updated annual harvests at set intervals as the population was reassessed, and 2) annually consistent harvest scenarios wherein annual harvest levels remain consistent into the future. All climate and disturbance scenarios indicated declines of varying severity in Pacific walrus abundance to the end of the twenty-first century, even in the absence of harvest. However, we found that a state-dependent annual harvest of 1.23% of the independent-aged female subset of the population (e.g., 1,280 independent-aged females harvested in 2020, similar to contemporary harvest levels) met our criterion for sustainability under all climate and disturbance scenarios, considering a medium risk tolerance level of 25%. This indicates that the present rate of Pacific walrus harvest is sustainable and will continue to be—provided the population is assessed at regular intervals and harvest is adapted to match changes in population dynamics. Our simulations indicate that a sustainable annually-consistent harvest is also possible but only at low levels if the population declines as expected. Applying a constant annual harvest of 1,280 independent-aged females failed to meet our criterion for sustainability under 3 of the 4 climate and disturbance scenarios we evaluated and had a higher probability of quasi-extinction than an equivalent state-dependent harvest scenario (1.23%). We highlight the importance of state-dependent management strategies and suggest our modeling framework is useful for managing harvest sustainability in a changing climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22686","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142860056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trail cameras can greatly inflate nest predation rates 跟踪摄像机可以大大提高巢穴捕食率
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22684
John-André Henden, Rolf Anker Ims, Marita Anti Strømeng

Photographic monitoring currently provides the most accurate means for identifying nest predators and eventually their role in bird population declines worldwide. However, previous studies have found that commercially available trail cameras represent an artificial structure that tend to negatively bias predation rates, likely through predator neophobia. Based on an experiment in Arctic tundra, involving 50 artificial nests and 30 cameras in each of 2 breeding seasons, we demonstrated that trail cameras attracted corvids (in particular ravens [Corvus corax]), which caused an extreme and positively biased predation rate that was consistent over a range of experimental and environmental conditions. We call for new technologies that allow for photographic monitoring of bird nests with minimal visual footprints, in the form of smaller cameras and more efficient internal batteries to minimize novel and conspicuous external features detectable by predators. However, even such improved devices need to be assessed with respect to potential effects on nest predation in each case.

目前,摄影监测提供了最准确的方法来识别巢穴捕食者,并最终确定它们在全球鸟类数量下降中的作用。然而,先前的研究发现,商业上可用的跟踪摄像机代表了一种人工结构,可能通过捕食者新恐惧症,倾向于对捕食率产生负面偏见。我们在北极苔原上进行了一项实验,在两个繁殖季节分别使用50个人工巢穴和30台摄像机,证明了跟踪摄像机吸引了鸦类(尤其是乌鸦[Corvus corax]),这导致了在一系列实验和环境条件下一致的极端和正偏捕食率。我们呼吁采用新技术,以更小的相机和更高效的内部电池的形式,允许以最小的视觉足迹对鸟巢进行摄影监测,以最大限度地减少被捕食者发现的新奇和明显的外部特征。然而,即使是这种改进的设备,也需要评估每种情况下对巢穴捕食的潜在影响。
{"title":"Trail cameras can greatly inflate nest predation rates","authors":"John-André Henden,&nbsp;Rolf Anker Ims,&nbsp;Marita Anti Strømeng","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22684","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22684","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Photographic monitoring currently provides the most accurate means for identifying nest predators and eventually their role in bird population declines worldwide. However, previous studies have found that commercially available trail cameras represent an artificial structure that tend to negatively bias predation rates, likely through predator neophobia. Based on an experiment in Arctic tundra, involving 50 artificial nests and 30 cameras in each of 2 breeding seasons, we demonstrated that trail cameras attracted corvids (in particular ravens [<i>Corvus corax</i>]), which caused an extreme and positively biased predation rate that was consistent over a range of experimental and environmental conditions. We call for new technologies that allow for photographic monitoring of bird nests with minimal visual footprints, in the form of smaller cameras and more efficient internal batteries to minimize novel and conspicuous external features detectable by predators. However, even such improved devices need to be assessed with respect to potential effects on nest predation in each case.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22684","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142862185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thank you to our Guardians of Science 感谢我们的科学卫士
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22700
Jacqueline L. Frair
<p>This is the first issue of <i>The Journal of Wildlife Management</i> (<i>JWM</i>) for which I served as Editor-in-Chief (EIC). I am deeply grateful for the trust and support of The Wildlife Society (TWS) and honored to follow in the footsteps of the esteemed EICs that have preceded me.</p><p>Foremost, I want to acknowledge the indelible legacy of our outgoing EIC, Paul Krausman. His collective time as EIC for JWM spanned 11 years (he served another 5 years as EIC for Wildlife Monographs), which contrasts to an average of ~2.5 years for the 31 other JWM EICs (Krausman <span>2022<i>a</i></span>). No other EIC for JWM oversaw such a dramatic scope of change in the publishing arena as Paul. To elaborate on that point, consider that Paul's EIC career began in 1988 with a drive to Texas for the transfer of “boxes upon boxes” of printed manuscripts (Krausman <span>2022<i>a</i></span>) and culminated with navigating how to embrace the benefits and guard against the perils of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing (Krausman <span>2023<i>a</i></span>). Paul deftly guided, protected, and improved our flagship journal through innumerable challenges over his career. I am grateful for his expertise and thoughtful leadership of JWM and his mentorship as he passed the torch to me.</p><p>In reviewing Paul's editorials, key aspects of his legacy as EIC became apparent and invariably underscored his goal of publishing “the best science in the field available to advance wildlife management and conservation” (Krausman <span>2022<i>a</i></span>). Towards that end Paul often offered tips for communicating science effectively (Krausman <span>2016<i>a</i></span>, <span><i>b</i></span>, <span>2017<i>a</i></span>, <span><i>b</i></span>, <span>2018<i>a</i></span>, <span>2020<i>a</i></span>, <span>2024<i>a</i></span>; Krausman and Cox <span>2020</span>), providing specific guidance to graduate students and first-time authors (Krausman <span>2021<i>a</i></span>, <span>2024<i>b</i></span>), establishing a WILD program to improve the quality of English writing and by extension the accessibility of JWM to international authors (Krausman <span>2015<i>a</i></span>), emphasizing ethics in science and publishing (Krausman <span>2016<i>c</i></span>, <span>2021<i>b</i></span>), and providing insights into how to get publications noticed (Krausman <span>2016<i>e</i></span>). As EIC, Paul often sought and was responsive to author concerns (Krausman <span>2017<i>c</i></span>, <span>2022<i>b</i></span>)—summarizing and streamlining author guidelines (Krausman <span>2017<i>d</i></span>, <span><i>e</i></span>, <span>2018<i>b</i></span>), explaining the necessary evils of page charges (Krausman <span>2017<i>f</i></span>) and rejections (Krausman <span>2020<i>b</i></span>), clarifying content differences between JWM and the Wildlife Society Bulletin (Krausman <span>2016<i>d</i></span>), highlighting the benefits of publishing with Wiley (Krausman <span>2017<i>g</i></span>), and b
这是我担任主编的《野生动物管理杂志》(JWM)的第一期。我非常感谢野生动物协会(TWS)的信任和支持,并很荣幸能够追随我之前受人尊敬的eic的脚步。首先,我要感谢即将离任的首席执行官保罗·克劳斯曼留下的不可磨灭的遗产。他在JWM担任EIC的总时间长达11年(他还担任野生动物专著的EIC 5年),与其他31位JWM EIC的平均约2.5年形成鲜明对比(Krausman 2022a)。在JWM的其他EIC中,没有人能像Paul那样在出版领域见证如此巨大的变化。为了详细说明这一点,请考虑保罗的EIC职业生涯始于1988年,当时他开车去德克萨斯州转移“一箱又一箱”的印刷手稿(Krausman 2022a),并在如何在科学出版中接受人工智能的好处并防范人工智能的危险(Krausman 2023a)时达到高潮。保罗在他的职业生涯中经历了无数的挑战,巧妙地指导、保护和改进了我们的旗舰杂志。我非常感谢他在JWM的专业知识和周到的领导,以及他将火炬传递给我的指导。在回顾保罗的社论时,他作为EIC的遗产的关键方面变得明显,并且总是强调他的目标是出版“可用于推进野生动物管理和保护的领域的最佳科学”(Krausman 2022a)。为此,保罗经常提供有效传播科学的技巧(Krausman 2016a, b, 2017a, b, 2018a, 2020a, 2024a;Krausman and Cox 2020),为研究生和首次作者提供具体指导(Krausman 2021a, 2024b),建立一个WILD计划以提高英语写作质量,并通过扩展JWM对国际作者的可访问性(Krausman 2015a),强调科学和出版中的伦理(Krausman 2016c, 2021b),并提供如何获得出版物注意的见解(Krausman 2016e)。作为EIC, Paul经常寻求并回应作者的关注(Krausman 2017c, 2022b) -总结和简化作者指南(Krausman 2017d, e, 2018b),解释页面收费(Krausman 2017f)和拒绝(Krausman 2020b)的必要弊端,澄清JWM和野生动物协会公报(Krausman 2016d)之间的内容差异,强调与Wiley一起出版的好处(Krausman 2017g)。从投稿和影响因素到从投稿到出版的每个评审阶段的时间,对期刊指标保持透明(例如,Krausman 2023c)。从这些社论中可以明显看出,保罗不仅非常关心JWM论文的质量,而且也非常关心这些论文背后的人,从进行研究的人,到审查和帮助完善所获得的见解的人,再到依靠发表的信息来帮助保护我们的野生动物遗产的人。每次有机会,Paul都强调要感谢“参与我们研究出版的每一个人,从提交作品的作者,到审稿人,副编辑,做出最终决定的eic, TWS员工,出版商,当然还有读者”(Krausman 2022a)。总的来说,他们是“科学守护者”(Krausman 2021b),我们期刊的完整性依赖于他们。在保罗的带领下,我想在这里花点时间特别感谢出版人员,安娜·尼普斯和艾莉森·考克斯,以及我们忠诚的副编辑委员会(见https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/19372817/editorialboard.html),没有他们,整个企业将崩溃。考虑到审稿人提供的非常重要且常常吃力不讨好的工作,我们将继续在JWM第三期中表彰上一年的所有审稿人(例如,Krausman 2023b)。自愿同行评议是科学诚信的支柱,我们忠诚的审稿人的价值是不可估量的。我还要感谢TWS出版委员会、TWS理事会和Wiley的工作人员,他们每个人都以无数重要的方式支持协会的出版物。最后,感谢328,180名下载者,他们代表了2024年迄今为止(截至11-12-24 8:56 AM)的最低文章读者人数。你们每个人都欠下了一笔巨大的债务。作为即将上任的首席执行官,我很荣幸能与这样一群有才华、有奉献精神的人一起工作,就像我对保罗的遗产感到谦卑一样——他留下了很多需要填补的空缺,无论是字面上还是象征意义上。我期待着在Paul和以前的eic留下的遗产的基础上继续努力,满足不断变化的出版领域的需求,并确保当前和未来的野生动物专业人员获得最好的野生动物科学的完整性和可及性。
{"title":"Thank you to our Guardians of Science","authors":"Jacqueline L. Frair","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22700","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22700","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;This is the first issue of &lt;i&gt;The Journal of Wildlife Management&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;i&gt;JWM&lt;/i&gt;) for which I served as Editor-in-Chief (EIC). I am deeply grateful for the trust and support of The Wildlife Society (TWS) and honored to follow in the footsteps of the esteemed EICs that have preceded me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Foremost, I want to acknowledge the indelible legacy of our outgoing EIC, Paul Krausman. His collective time as EIC for JWM spanned 11 years (he served another 5 years as EIC for Wildlife Monographs), which contrasts to an average of ~2.5 years for the 31 other JWM EICs (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;). No other EIC for JWM oversaw such a dramatic scope of change in the publishing arena as Paul. To elaborate on that point, consider that Paul's EIC career began in 1988 with a drive to Texas for the transfer of “boxes upon boxes” of printed manuscripts (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) and culminated with navigating how to embrace the benefits and guard against the perils of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;). Paul deftly guided, protected, and improved our flagship journal through innumerable challenges over his career. I am grateful for his expertise and thoughtful leadership of JWM and his mentorship as he passed the torch to me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In reviewing Paul's editorials, key aspects of his legacy as EIC became apparent and invariably underscored his goal of publishing “the best science in the field available to advance wildlife management and conservation” (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;). Towards that end Paul often offered tips for communicating science effectively (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2016&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;; Krausman and Cox &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;), providing specific guidance to graduate students and first-time authors (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;), establishing a WILD program to improve the quality of English writing and by extension the accessibility of JWM to international authors (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2015&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;), emphasizing ethics in science and publishing (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2016&lt;i&gt;c&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;), and providing insights into how to get publications noticed (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2016&lt;i&gt;e&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;). As EIC, Paul often sought and was responsive to author concerns (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;i&gt;c&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;)—summarizing and streamlining author guidelines (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;i&gt;d&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;&lt;i&gt;e&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;2018&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;), explaining the necessary evils of page charges (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;i&gt;f&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) and rejections (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;), clarifying content differences between JWM and the Wildlife Society Bulletin (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2016&lt;i&gt;d&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;), highlighting the benefits of publishing with Wiley (Krausman &lt;span&gt;2017&lt;i&gt;g&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;), and b","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22700","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142862169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Density estimation using spatial capture-recapture analyses: application to vaccination of prairie dogs against sylvatic plague 利用空间捕获-再捕获分析进行密度估计:在草原土拨鼠预防森林鼠疫疫苗接种中的应用
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22685
Robin E. Russell, Daniel W. Tripp, Katherine L. D. Richgels, Tonie E. Rocke

Prairie dogs are notoriously difficult to enumerate, with previously methods including visual counts, mark-resight, burrow counts, and catch per unit effort. Unlike those methods, spatial capture-recapture (SCR) analyses allow for formal estimation of density along with associated estimates of uncertainty, detection probability, and the size of the average area over which an individual was detected during the study period (referred to as an activity center). Using SCR analyses, we compared density estimates as part of a field trial evaluating the effectiveness of an oral sylvatic plague vaccine in black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus), Gunnison's prairie dogs (C. gunnisoni), white-tailed prairie dogs (C. leucurus), and Utah prairie dogs (C. parvidens) at 11 study areas in the western United States. The study was designed as a matched pairs analysis that included 27 individual paired plots (54 plots), each consisting of a plot treated with vaccine baits and a plot treated with placebo baits. Overall, we captured >3,000 individuals each year on these plots, and recapture rates ranged from 5–87%. For black-tailed prairie dogs, density estimates ranged from 2.7 individuals/ha (95% CI = 2.2–3.3/ha) to 77.3/ha (63.2–94.4/ha), and for Gunnison's prairie dogs, estimates ranged from 11.7/ha (10.6–12.8/ha) to 15.4/ha (14.4–16.7/ha). White-tailed prairie dogs were at their lowest density (3.3/ha, 95% CI = 2.9–3.8/ha) during the first year of the study and their highest density (14.5/ha; 13.5–15.6/ha) during the last year of the study. Utah prairie dog density estimates ranged from a low of 4.0/ha (95% CI = 3.55–4.6/ha) to a high of 20.8/ha (16.8–25.8/ha). Best-fitting models of prairie dog density indicated increasing patterns of density over time on most study plots, negative effects of plague, and positive effects of vaccination. Finally, we found low correlations between catch per unit effort estimates from previous published literature at these sites and our densities estimates. Spatial capture-recapture estimates allowed us to consistently compare treatment effects across space and time, although some exceptions are noted where we observed significant movement between plots within a pair (3 pairs) and when trapping effort between plots or years was not consistent.

草原土拨鼠是出了名的难以计数的,以前的方法包括目测计数、标记视力、洞穴计数和单位捕获量。与这些方法不同,空间捕获-再捕获(SCR)分析允许对密度进行正式估计,同时对不确定性、检测概率和研究期间检测到个体的平均区域(称为活动中心)的大小进行相关估计。利用SCR分析,我们比较了在美国西部11个研究区域对黑尾草原土拨鼠(Cynomys ludovicianus)、甘尼森草原土拨鼠(C. gunnisoni)、白尾草原土拨鼠(C. leucurus)和犹他草原土拨鼠(C. parvidens)口服森林鼠疫疫苗有效性的实地试验的密度估计。该研究被设计为配对分析,包括27个单独的配对地块(54个地块),每个地块由一个用疫苗诱饵处理的地块和一个用安慰剂诱饵处理的地块组成。总的来说,我们每年在这些地块上捕获3000只个体,再捕获率在5-87%之间。黑尾土拨鼠的密度估计范围为2.7只/公顷(95% CI = 2.2-3.3 /公顷)至77.3只/公顷(63.2-94.4 /公顷),甘尼森土拨鼠的密度估计范围为11.7只/公顷(10.6-12.8 /公顷)至15.4只/公顷(14.4-16.7 /公顷)。白尾土拨鼠在研究的第一年密度最低(3.3只/公顷,95% CI = 2.9-3.8只/公顷),而在研究的第一年密度最高(14.5只/公顷;13.5-15.6 /公顷)。犹他州草原土拨鼠的密度估计从最低的4.0只/公顷(95% CI = 3.55-4.6只/公顷)到最高的20.8只/公顷(16.8-25.8只/公顷)不等。最适合的草原土拨鼠密度模型表明,在大多数研究地块上,随着时间的推移,草原土拨鼠密度呈增加趋势,鼠疫的负面影响和疫苗接种的积极影响。最后,我们发现这些地点以前发表的文献的单位努力渔获量估计值与我们的密度估计值之间的相关性很低。空间捕获-再捕获估计使我们能够在空间和时间上一致地比较处理效果,尽管我们注意到一些例外情况,即我们观察到一对(3对)中的地块之间的显著移动,以及当地块或年份之间的捕获努力不一致时。
{"title":"Density estimation using spatial capture-recapture analyses: application to vaccination of prairie dogs against sylvatic plague","authors":"Robin E. Russell,&nbsp;Daniel W. Tripp,&nbsp;Katherine L. D. Richgels,&nbsp;Tonie E. Rocke","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22685","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22685","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prairie dogs are notoriously difficult to enumerate, with previously methods including visual counts, mark-resight, burrow counts, and catch per unit effort. Unlike those methods, spatial capture-recapture (SCR) analyses allow for formal estimation of density along with associated estimates of uncertainty, detection probability, and the size of the average area over which an individual was detected during the study period (referred to as an activity center). Using SCR analyses, we compared density estimates as part of a field trial evaluating the effectiveness of an oral sylvatic plague vaccine in black-tailed prairie dogs (<i>Cynomys ludovicianus</i>), Gunnison's prairie dogs (<i>C. gunnisoni</i>), white-tailed prairie dogs (<i>C. leucurus</i>), and Utah prairie dogs (<i>C. parvidens</i>) at 11 study areas in the western United States. The study was designed as a matched pairs analysis that included 27 individual paired plots (54 plots), each consisting of a plot treated with vaccine baits and a plot treated with placebo baits. Overall, we captured &gt;3,000 individuals each year on these plots, and recapture rates ranged from 5–87%. For black-tailed prairie dogs, density estimates ranged from 2.7 individuals/ha (95% CI = 2.2–3.3/ha) to 77.3/ha (63.2–94.4/ha), and for Gunnison's prairie dogs, estimates ranged from 11.7/ha (10.6–12.8/ha) to 15.4/ha (14.4–16.7/ha). White-tailed prairie dogs were at their lowest density (3.3/ha, 95% CI = 2.9–3.8/ha) during the first year of the study and their highest density (14.5/ha; 13.5–15.6/ha) during the last year of the study. Utah prairie dog density estimates ranged from a low of 4.0/ha (95% CI = 3.55–4.6/ha) to a high of 20.8/ha (16.8–25.8/ha). Best-fitting models of prairie dog density indicated increasing patterns of density over time on most study plots, negative effects of plague, and positive effects of vaccination. Finally, we found low correlations between catch per unit effort estimates from previous published literature at these sites and our densities estimates. Spatial capture-recapture estimates allowed us to consistently compare treatment effects across space and time, although some exceptions are noted where we observed significant movement between plots within a pair (3 pairs) and when trapping effort between plots or years was not consistent.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142862176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Habitat suitability and relative abundance of wild boars in the east-central Tianshan Mountains, China 中国天山中东部野猪的栖息地适宜性和相对丰度
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22683
Zikun Gao, Ruifen Wang, Yang Yang, Shuyu Jin, Xingzhe Wang, Qiaoqi Sun, Kun Shi

As wild boar populations and their distribution ranges increase, human–wild boar conflicts have become increasingly prevalent in numerous regions across the globe. These conflicts have a profound impact on human livelihoods, resulting in significant economic losses. Understanding the habitat requirements and relative abundance of wild boars is crucial prior to implementing any conservation measures. However, studies on wild boar habitat and population in the central and eastern regions of the Tianshan Mountains in China are lacking. We assessed the activity patterns and relative abundance of wild boars in these areas and evaluated habitat suitability using a combination of camera trapping, line transects, species distribution modeling (maximum entropy model), and hierarchical abundance modeling (Bayesian N-mixture model). We used 311 infrared cameras and 280 field-based line transects to cover approximately 31,000 km² from September 2022 to May 2023 in the east-central Tianshan Mountains. We used 240 wild boar distribution locations and 13 environmental predictors in the development of species distribution models. We also used species counts and associated environmental predictors in the N-mixture model to estimate the relative abundance of wild boar. Wild boars were most active during crepuscular hours (1800), and relatively active in the diurnal period compared to the nocturnal period. The probability of wild boar occurrence increased with higher normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), the minimum temperature of the coldest month, and annual temperatures below 39°C. Boars were most likely to be found in closed deciduous-coniferous forests. The relative abundance of wild boars was positively affected by NDVI and negatively affected by the minimum temperature of the coldest month and temperature annual range. Based on our results, we suggest areas of management priority. In particular, extensive and intact habitat with substantial wild boar populations, such as the Banfanggou, the South Mountain of Urumqi, and the Hutubi, should be prioritized for long-term wild boar population monitoring and management so the adverse impacts of increasing wild boar populations in the study region can be minimized.

随着野猪数量及其分布范围的增加,人类与野猪的冲突在全球许多地区变得越来越普遍。这些冲突对人类生计产生深远影响,造成重大经济损失。在实施任何保护措施之前,了解栖息地需求和野猪的相对数量是至关重要的。然而,对天山中东部地区野猪生境和种群数量的研究较少。采用摄像机诱捕法、样线法、物种分布模型(最大熵模型)和分层丰度模型(贝叶斯n -混合模型)对这些地区野猪的活动模式和相对丰度进行了评估,并对栖息地适宜性进行了评估。从2022年9月至2023年5月,我们在天山中东部使用311台红外摄像机和280个基于实地的样线覆盖了大约31,000平方公里。利用240个野猪分布点和13个环境预测因子建立了野猪物种分布模型。我们还在n -混合物模型中使用物种计数和相关环境预测因子来估计野猪的相对丰度。野猪在黄昏时最活跃(1800),与夜间相比,白天相对活跃。归一化植被指数(NDVI)越高、最冷月最低气温越高、年平均气温低于39℃时,野猪发生的概率越高。野猪最可能出现在封闭的落叶针叶林中。野猪相对丰度受NDVI的正影响,受最冷月最低气温和年温差的负影响。根据我们的结果,我们提出了管理的优先领域。特别是在板坊沟、乌鲁木齐南山、呼图壁等广布、完整的野猪种群丰富的栖息地,应优先进行野猪种群的长期监测和管理,以尽量减少野猪种群增加对研究区域的不利影响。
{"title":"Habitat suitability and relative abundance of wild boars in the east-central Tianshan Mountains, China","authors":"Zikun Gao,&nbsp;Ruifen Wang,&nbsp;Yang Yang,&nbsp;Shuyu Jin,&nbsp;Xingzhe Wang,&nbsp;Qiaoqi Sun,&nbsp;Kun Shi","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22683","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22683","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As wild boar populations and their distribution ranges increase, human–wild boar conflicts have become increasingly prevalent in numerous regions across the globe. These conflicts have a profound impact on human livelihoods, resulting in significant economic losses. Understanding the habitat requirements and relative abundance of wild boars is crucial prior to implementing any conservation measures. However, studies on wild boar habitat and population in the central and eastern regions of the Tianshan Mountains in China are lacking. We assessed the activity patterns and relative abundance of wild boars in these areas and evaluated habitat suitability using a combination of camera trapping, line transects, species distribution modeling (maximum entropy model), and hierarchical abundance modeling (Bayesian N-mixture model). We used 311 infrared cameras and 280 field-based line transects to cover approximately 31,000 km² from September 2022 to May 2023 in the east-central Tianshan Mountains. We used 240 wild boar distribution locations and 13 environmental predictors in the development of species distribution models. We also used species counts and associated environmental predictors in the N-mixture model to estimate the relative abundance of wild boar. Wild boars were most active during crepuscular hours (1800), and relatively active in the diurnal period compared to the nocturnal period. The probability of wild boar occurrence increased with higher normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), the minimum temperature of the coldest month, and annual temperatures below 39°C. Boars were most likely to be found in closed deciduous-coniferous forests. The relative abundance of wild boars was positively affected by NDVI and negatively affected by the minimum temperature of the coldest month and temperature annual range. Based on our results, we suggest areas of management priority. In particular, extensive and intact habitat with substantial wild boar populations, such as the Banfanggou, the South Mountain of Urumqi, and the Hutubi, should be prioritized for long-term wild boar population monitoring and management so the adverse impacts of increasing wild boar populations in the study region can be minimized.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142862271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Restoring historical moose densities results in fewer wolves killed for woodland caribou conservation 恢复驼鹿的历史密度可减少为保护林地驯鹿而捕杀的狼群数量
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22673
Michelle L. McLellan, Adam T. Ford, Dave Hervieux, Clayton T. Lamb, Mateen Hessami, Michael C. Bridger, Robert Serrouya
<p>Woodland caribou (<i>Rangifer tarandus caribou</i>) are declining across much of their distribution in Canada in response to habitat alteration, leading to unsustainable predation, particularly by wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>). Habitat alteration can benefit the primary prey species of wolves (moose [<i>Alces alces</i>] and deer [<i>Odocoileus</i> spp.]) by creating early seral conditions that contain more of their preferred food types. This increase in primary prey populations results in elevated wolf abundance and heightened predation pressure on caribou. In response to the elevated wolf populations and the risks to caribou, managers have reduced wolf abundance in key areas. Ecological theory suggests that reducing wolf abundance would release moose from the top-down effects of wolf predation, potentially allowing moose populations to grow. Elevated moose abundance thus has the potential to cause wolf populations to rebound quickly each year following reductions, suggesting a possible link between moose abundance and the number of wolves killed for caribou conservation. To test this idea we used a unique management situation in British Columbia and Alberta, Canada, where lethal wolf removals were annually conducted across specific southern mountain caribou population ranges and, in some places, moose populations were concurrently reduced via liberalized hunting. We used indices of moose abundance and wolf removal data to test the hypothesis that reducing moose populations to a historical abundance target by hunting leads to fewer wolves killed for caribou conservation. After controlling for habitat quality, wolves removed per km<sup>2</sup> was 3.2 times lower in areas with reduced moose density (<span></span><math> <semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mover> <mi>x</mi> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> </mrow> </mrow> <annotation> $bar{x}$</annotation> </semantics></math> = 1.55 wolves/1,000 km<sup>2</sup> ± 0.33 [SE]) than in those without reduced moose density (<span></span><math> <semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mover> <mi>x</mi> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> </mrow> </mrow> <annotation> $bar{x}$</annotation> </semantics></math> = 5.02 wolves/1,000 km<sup>2</sup> ± 0.52). However, the average number of wolves removed per year decreased under both conditions. After 9 years, there was a 35% reduction in the predicted difference in the annual removal between areas with and without moose reduction. Our results suggest that policies that
林地驯鹿(Rangifer tarandus caribou)在加拿大分布的大部分地区都在减少,以应对栖息地的改变,导致不可持续的捕食,特别是狼(Canis lupus)。栖息地的改变可以为狼的主要猎物物种(驼鹿和鹿)创造早期的几种条件,使它们拥有更多喜欢的食物类型,从而使它们受益。主要猎物数量的增加导致狼数量的增加和驯鹿捕食压力的增加。为了应对狼数量的增加和对驯鹿的威胁,管理人员减少了关键地区的狼数量。生态学理论认为,减少狼的数量将使驼鹿从狼捕食的自上而下的影响中解脱出来,从而有可能使驼鹿的数量增长。因此,驼鹿数量的增加有可能导致狼的数量在减少后每年迅速反弹,这表明驼鹿数量的增加与为保护北美驯鹿而杀死的狼数量之间可能存在联系。为了验证这一想法,我们在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省和阿尔伯塔省采用了一种独特的管理情况,在那里,每年在特定的南部山地驯鹿种群范围内进行致命的狼清除,在一些地方,驼鹿种群同时通过自由狩猎减少。我们使用驼鹿丰度指数和狼的消失数据来验证这样一个假设,即通过狩猎将驼鹿数量减少到历史丰度目标,导致为保护北美驯鹿而杀死的狼减少。在控制了栖息地质量之后,驼鹿密度减少的地区(x¯$bar{x}$ = 1.55只狼/ 1000 km2±0.33 [SE])每平方公里的狼移走量是未减少驼鹿密度的3.2倍(X¯$bar{X}$ = 5.02只狼/1,000 km2±0.52)。然而,在这两种情况下,每年被清除的狼的平均数量都减少了。9年后,在驼鹿数量减少和驼鹿数量没有减少的地区之间,预测的年迁移量的差异减少了35%。我们的研究结果表明,不能减少或稳定驼鹿数量的政策将导致更多的狼被清除,以增加驯鹿的数量。像狼的减少一样,驼鹿的减少也会引起争议,并影响到当地的采集者。因此,了解支持北美驯鹿恢复的行动的后果对于支持基于证据的政策讨论至关重要。
{"title":"Restoring historical moose densities results in fewer wolves killed for woodland caribou conservation","authors":"Michelle L. McLellan,&nbsp;Adam T. Ford,&nbsp;Dave Hervieux,&nbsp;Clayton T. Lamb,&nbsp;Mateen Hessami,&nbsp;Michael C. Bridger,&nbsp;Robert Serrouya","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22673","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22673","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Woodland caribou (&lt;i&gt;Rangifer tarandus caribou&lt;/i&gt;) are declining across much of their distribution in Canada in response to habitat alteration, leading to unsustainable predation, particularly by wolves (&lt;i&gt;Canis lupus&lt;/i&gt;). Habitat alteration can benefit the primary prey species of wolves (moose [&lt;i&gt;Alces alces&lt;/i&gt;] and deer [&lt;i&gt;Odocoileus&lt;/i&gt; spp.]) by creating early seral conditions that contain more of their preferred food types. This increase in primary prey populations results in elevated wolf abundance and heightened predation pressure on caribou. In response to the elevated wolf populations and the risks to caribou, managers have reduced wolf abundance in key areas. Ecological theory suggests that reducing wolf abundance would release moose from the top-down effects of wolf predation, potentially allowing moose populations to grow. Elevated moose abundance thus has the potential to cause wolf populations to rebound quickly each year following reductions, suggesting a possible link between moose abundance and the number of wolves killed for caribou conservation. To test this idea we used a unique management situation in British Columbia and Alberta, Canada, where lethal wolf removals were annually conducted across specific southern mountain caribou population ranges and, in some places, moose populations were concurrently reduced via liberalized hunting. We used indices of moose abundance and wolf removal data to test the hypothesis that reducing moose populations to a historical abundance target by hunting leads to fewer wolves killed for caribou conservation. After controlling for habitat quality, wolves removed per km&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; was 3.2 times lower in areas with reduced moose density (&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;math&gt;\u0000 &lt;semantics&gt;\u0000 &lt;mrow&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;mrow&gt;\u0000 &lt;mover&gt;\u0000 &lt;mi&gt;x&lt;/mi&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;mo&gt;¯&lt;/mo&gt;\u0000 &lt;/mover&gt;\u0000 &lt;/mrow&gt;\u0000 &lt;/mrow&gt;\u0000 &lt;annotation&gt; $bar{x}$&lt;/annotation&gt;\u0000 &lt;/semantics&gt;&lt;/math&gt; = 1.55 wolves/1,000 km&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; ± 0.33 [SE]) than in those without reduced moose density (&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;math&gt;\u0000 &lt;semantics&gt;\u0000 &lt;mrow&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;mrow&gt;\u0000 &lt;mover&gt;\u0000 &lt;mi&gt;x&lt;/mi&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;mo&gt;¯&lt;/mo&gt;\u0000 &lt;/mover&gt;\u0000 &lt;/mrow&gt;\u0000 &lt;/mrow&gt;\u0000 &lt;annotation&gt; $bar{x}$&lt;/annotation&gt;\u0000 &lt;/semantics&gt;&lt;/math&gt; = 5.02 wolves/1,000 km&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; ± 0.52). However, the average number of wolves removed per year decreased under both conditions. After 9 years, there was a 35% reduction in the predicted difference in the annual removal between areas with and without moose reduction. Our results suggest that policies that ","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22673","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142861969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
No evidence hunting bait increases American black bear population growth in Maine, USA 在美国缅因州,没有证据表明狩猎诱饵会增加美国黑熊的数量
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22681
Dana J. Morin, Jennifer H. Vashon, Matthew O'Neal, Nathan J. Hostetter, Elizabeth A. Flaherty

American black bear (Ursus americanus) populations are increasing throughout much of North America. Use of multiple harvest methods, including hunting over bait, is intended to increase harvest success rates to meet harvest and population management objectives. However, black bear population growth can be influenced by food availability, and some speculate the use of bait may inadvertently increase bear abundance through food resource supplementation. We collected hair from black bears captured from 2005–2019 and a selection of potential food items, including those used as bait from 3 study areas in Maine, USA, with different levels of human influence. We used stable isotope analysis of the black bear hair and food item samples to evaluate the contribution of different identified food groups to the diet of individual bears. We found no evidence that greater contribution of human food resources, including bait, increased the number of cubs per litter for reproductive females or that human foods comprised a greater part of the diet in years when natural food resources were less abundant. Approximately 69% of black bear harvest occurred over bait. We found the probability of reproductive-age females to be harvested increased with average representation of human foods with high carbon enrichment (including bait) in their diet, but the relationship was weak, likely because of sampling constraints. Additionally, the probability of being harvested was greater in years when natural food resources were scarce. We conclude that bait is not available on the landscape in large enough amounts or for a sufficient amount of time in Maine to substantially influence female reproduction. Our results indicate hunting over bait is an effective tool in a state that is attempting to maintain a stable bear population via harvest, and dispels conjecture that hunting over bait may increase cub production and offset the intention of harvest.

美国黑熊(Ursus americanus)的数量在北美大部分地区都在增加。使用多种收获方法,包括在诱饵上狩猎,旨在提高收获成功率,以实现收获和种群管理目标。然而,黑熊数量的增长可能会受到食物供应的影响,一些人推测,使用诱饵可能会通过补充食物资源无意中增加熊的数量。我们收集了2005年至2019年捕获的黑熊的毛发,并选择了一些潜在的食物,包括来自美国缅因州3个人类影响程度不同的研究区域用作诱饵的食物。通过对黑熊毛发和食物样本的稳定同位素分析,我们评估了不同种类的食物对黑熊个体饮食的贡献。我们没有发现证据表明人类食物资源(包括诱饵)的增加会增加育龄雌性每窝幼崽的数量,或者在自然食物资源较少的年份,人类食物占饮食的比例更大。大约69%的黑熊被捕杀是因为吃了诱饵。我们发现,随着人类食物中高碳富集(包括诱饵)的平均代表性增加,育龄雌性被捕获的可能性增加,但这种关系很弱,可能是因为采样限制。此外,在天然食物资源稀缺的年份,被收获的可能性更大。我们得出的结论是,在缅因州,饵料的数量不够大,投放时间也不够长,无法对雌性繁殖产生实质性影响。我们的研究结果表明,在一个试图通过捕获来维持熊种群稳定的州,饵上狩猎是一种有效的工具,并消除了对饵上狩猎可能增加幼崽产量和抵消捕获意图的猜测。
{"title":"No evidence hunting bait increases American black bear population growth in Maine, USA","authors":"Dana J. Morin,&nbsp;Jennifer H. Vashon,&nbsp;Matthew O'Neal,&nbsp;Nathan J. Hostetter,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Flaherty","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22681","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22681","url":null,"abstract":"<p>American black bear (<i>Ursus americanus</i>) populations are increasing throughout much of North America. Use of multiple harvest methods, including hunting over bait, is intended to increase harvest success rates to meet harvest and population management objectives. However, black bear population growth can be influenced by food availability, and some speculate the use of bait may inadvertently increase bear abundance through food resource supplementation. We collected hair from black bears captured from 2005–2019 and a selection of potential food items, including those used as bait from 3 study areas in Maine, USA, with different levels of human influence. We used stable isotope analysis of the black bear hair and food item samples to evaluate the contribution of different identified food groups to the diet of individual bears. We found no evidence that greater contribution of human food resources, including bait, increased the number of cubs per litter for reproductive females or that human foods comprised a greater part of the diet in years when natural food resources were less abundant. Approximately 69% of black bear harvest occurred over bait. We found the probability of reproductive-age females to be harvested increased with average representation of human foods with high carbon enrichment (including bait) in their diet, but the relationship was weak, likely because of sampling constraints. Additionally, the probability of being harvested was greater in years when natural food resources were scarce. We conclude that bait is not available on the landscape in large enough amounts or for a sufficient amount of time in Maine to substantially influence female reproduction. Our results indicate hunting over bait is an effective tool in a state that is attempting to maintain a stable bear population via harvest, and dispels conjecture that hunting over bait may increase cub production and offset the intention of harvest.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142861723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Linking summer nutrition to behavior and performance of black-tailed deer 将夏季营养与黑尾鹿的行为和表现联系起来
IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22679
Katrina K. Lopez, Katey S. Huggler, DeWaine H. Jackson, Lisa A. Shipley, Ryan A. Long

Many large-herbivore populations are regulated at least in part by bottom-up forces, and thus relationships between herbivores and their habitat are of fundamental importance to wildlife managers. Variation in nutritional resources—and how herbivores respond to that variation—influences rates of nutrient intake, which directly affect nutritional condition, pregnancy rates, timing of parturition, offspring birth mass, and survival. Accordingly, nutrition-focused research holds great potential for uncovering the mechanisms that govern population performance of large herbivores and for assessing the nature and magnitude of bottom-up limitations. We quantified relationships between the foodscape (i.e., spatiotemporal variation in forage quality and abundance) in southwestern Oregon, USA, and black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) behavior and performance, with a focus on the influence of maternal nutrition on fawn survival. We hypothesized that black-tailed deer performance (i.e., fawn birth mass and survival) is influenced by the availability of high-quality forage during spring and summer and patterns of foodscape use exhibited by individual deer. From 2016–2023 we monitored movement and survival of adult female black-tailed deer and their offspring. We also conducted intensive vegetation sampling and used generalized additive modeling to map the foodscape available to deer in spring and summer. Suitable forage biomass (i.e., maximum biomass of forage that together exceeded quality thresholds for supporting one fawn) was highly variable across space and time, and our top foodscape model explained 70% of the variation in suitable biomass (adjusted R2 = 0.70). We observed a strong, positive relationship between use of the foodscape by maternal females prior to parturition and fawn birth mass. Although maternal foodscape use after parturition did not influence the probability of fawn survival, survival increased with increasing birth mass. These results suggest that the effects of nutrition on fawn survival in our study system are indirectly mediated by maternal behavior (i.e., use of the foodscape) and the corresponding effects on birth mass of fawns. Our study adds to a growing body of literature supporting a fundamental link between foodscape use and population performance of large herbivores. Wildlife managers can use the dynamic models we developed to assess habitat quality and to make quantitative predictions about how different management actions (e.g., forest thinning) are likely to influence habitat quality and performance of black-tailed deer.

许多大型食草动物的数量至少有一部分是由自下而上的力量调节的,因此食草动物与其栖息地之间的关系对野生动物管理者来说至关重要。营养资源的变化--以及食草动物如何应对这种变化--影响着营养摄入率,而营养摄入率又直接影响着营养状况、怀孕率、产仔时间、后代出生质量和存活率。因此,以营养为重点的研究在揭示支配大型食草动物种群表现的机制以及评估自下而上限制的性质和程度方面具有巨大潜力。我们量化了美国俄勒冈州西南部食物景观(即饲料质量和丰度的时空变化)与黑尾鹿(Odocoileus hemionus columbianus)行为和表现之间的关系,重点研究了母体营养对幼鹿存活率的影响。我们假设,黑尾鹿的表现(即小鹿的出生质量和存活率)受春夏季优质饲料的可用性以及鹿个体表现出的食物景观使用模式的影响。2016-2023 年间,我们对成年雌性黑尾鹿及其后代的活动和存活情况进行了监测。我们还进行了密集的植被采样,并使用广义加法模型绘制了鹿在春季和夏季的食物景观图。适合的牧草生物量(即牧草的最大生物量,这些牧草的总和超过了养活一只幼鹿的质量阈值)在不同的时间和空间变化很大,我们的顶级食物景观模型解释了适合的生物量变化的 70%(调整后 R2 = 0.70)。我们观察到,母性雌鹿在产前对食物景观的利用与幼鹿的出生质量之间存在很强的正相关关系。虽然产后母体对食物景观的利用并不影响幼鹿的存活概率,但存活率随着出生质量的增加而增加。这些结果表明,在我们的研究系统中,营养对幼体存活率的影响是由母体行为(即食物景观的使用)和对幼体出生质量的相应影响间接介导的。我们的研究为越来越多支持食物景观利用与大型食草动物种群表现之间存在根本联系的文献增添了新的内容。野生动物管理者可以利用我们开发的动态模型来评估栖息地质量,并对不同的管理措施(如森林疏伐)可能如何影响栖息地质量和黑尾鹿的表现进行定量预测。
{"title":"Linking summer nutrition to behavior and performance of black-tailed deer","authors":"Katrina K. Lopez,&nbsp;Katey S. Huggler,&nbsp;DeWaine H. Jackson,&nbsp;Lisa A. Shipley,&nbsp;Ryan A. Long","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22679","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22679","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many large-herbivore populations are regulated at least in part by bottom-up forces, and thus relationships between herbivores and their habitat are of fundamental importance to wildlife managers. Variation in nutritional resources—and how herbivores respond to that variation—influences rates of nutrient intake, which directly affect nutritional condition, pregnancy rates, timing of parturition, offspring birth mass, and survival. Accordingly, nutrition-focused research holds great potential for uncovering the mechanisms that govern population performance of large herbivores and for assessing the nature and magnitude of bottom-up limitations. We quantified relationships between the foodscape (i.e., spatiotemporal variation in forage quality and abundance) in southwestern Oregon, USA, and black-tailed deer (<i>Odocoileus hemionus columbianus</i>) behavior and performance, with a focus on the influence of maternal nutrition on fawn survival. We hypothesized that black-tailed deer performance (i.e., fawn birth mass and survival) is influenced by the availability of high-quality forage during spring and summer and patterns of foodscape use exhibited by individual deer. From 2016–2023 we monitored movement and survival of adult female black-tailed deer and their offspring. We also conducted intensive vegetation sampling and used generalized additive modeling to map the foodscape available to deer in spring and summer. Suitable forage biomass (i.e., maximum biomass of forage that together exceeded quality thresholds for supporting one fawn) was highly variable across space and time, and our top foodscape model explained 70% of the variation in suitable biomass (adjusted <i>R</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.70). We observed a strong, positive relationship between use of the foodscape by maternal females prior to parturition and fawn birth mass. Although maternal foodscape use after parturition did not influence the probability of fawn survival, survival increased with increasing birth mass. These results suggest that the effects of nutrition on fawn survival in our study system are indirectly mediated by maternal behavior (i.e., use of the foodscape) and the corresponding effects on birth mass of fawns. Our study adds to a growing body of literature supporting a fundamental link between foodscape use and population performance of large herbivores. Wildlife managers can use the dynamic models we developed to assess habitat quality and to make quantitative predictions about how different management actions (e.g., forest thinning) are likely to influence habitat quality and performance of black-tailed deer.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142861083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1