Research methodology in finance

H. Benjana, O. Mesnaoui, O. Yamani
{"title":"Research methodology in finance","authors":"H. Benjana, O. Mesnaoui, O. Yamani","doi":"10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose- Our research aims to explore the different philosophical and epistemological concepts and approaches in traditional finance and behavioral finance, based on the analysis of scientific articles. We aim to provide a comprehensive insight into the theoretical foundations that guide these two branches of finance, with particular emphasis on the epistemological and methodological nuances that distinguish them.\nMethodology- Our research is based on a careful analysis of the relevant scientific literature in traditional and behavioural finance. By giving specific importance to epistemological aspects, we try to discover the paradigms of thought that influence the understanding and interpretation of financial phenomena within these two fields. Similarly, our meticulous examination of this research aims to identify the preferred methodological approaches.\nFindings- The results of the analysis show that traditional and behavioural finance have different epistemological and methodological approaches. most traditional financiers follow a quantitative research approach based on numerical data and a purely statistical analysis. However, behaviorists have opted for methodological triangulation, which further explains the combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches to achieve stronger results and that one can modify or complement the other. Behaviorists recognize the importance of cognitive and emotional biases in the decision-making process of individuals, leading to more holistic models and approaches. With regard to epistemology, most research in Finance on the positivist paradigm, on objectivity and on the relationship of cause and effect.\nConclusion- In conclusion, our study highlights the importance of developing research methodologies adapted to each discipline of management sciences, taking into account the specificities of each field. Moreover, the analysis of the scientific literature in traditional and behavioural finance shows that researchers must be aware of the different epistemological and methodological perspectives in order to conduct rigorous and valid research.\n\nKeywords: Epistemology, methodology, management sciences, traditional finance, behavioural finance.\nJEL Codes: B40, G10, G40\n","PeriodicalId":517141,"journal":{"name":"Pressacademia","volume":"45 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pressacademia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose- Our research aims to explore the different philosophical and epistemological concepts and approaches in traditional finance and behavioral finance, based on the analysis of scientific articles. We aim to provide a comprehensive insight into the theoretical foundations that guide these two branches of finance, with particular emphasis on the epistemological and methodological nuances that distinguish them. Methodology- Our research is based on a careful analysis of the relevant scientific literature in traditional and behavioural finance. By giving specific importance to epistemological aspects, we try to discover the paradigms of thought that influence the understanding and interpretation of financial phenomena within these two fields. Similarly, our meticulous examination of this research aims to identify the preferred methodological approaches. Findings- The results of the analysis show that traditional and behavioural finance have different epistemological and methodological approaches. most traditional financiers follow a quantitative research approach based on numerical data and a purely statistical analysis. However, behaviorists have opted for methodological triangulation, which further explains the combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches to achieve stronger results and that one can modify or complement the other. Behaviorists recognize the importance of cognitive and emotional biases in the decision-making process of individuals, leading to more holistic models and approaches. With regard to epistemology, most research in Finance on the positivist paradigm, on objectivity and on the relationship of cause and effect. Conclusion- In conclusion, our study highlights the importance of developing research methodologies adapted to each discipline of management sciences, taking into account the specificities of each field. Moreover, the analysis of the scientific literature in traditional and behavioural finance shows that researchers must be aware of the different epistemological and methodological perspectives in order to conduct rigorous and valid research. Keywords: Epistemology, methodology, management sciences, traditional finance, behavioural finance. JEL Codes: B40, G10, G40
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融学研究方法
目的--我们的研究旨在通过对科学文章的分析,探讨传统金融学和行为金融学中不同的哲学和认识论概念和方法。我们的研究基于对传统金融学和行为金融学相关科学文献的仔细分析。通过对认识论方面的特别重视,我们试图发现影响这两个领域对金融现象的理解和解释的思维范式。同样,我们对这项研究进行了细致的检查,目的是找出首选的方法论方法。研究结果--分析结果表明,传统金融学和行为金融学具有不同的认识论和方法论方法。大多数传统金融学家遵循基于数字数据和纯统计分析的定量研究方法。然而,行为主义者则选择了方法论上的三角测量法,这进一步解释了定性和定量方法的结合可以取得更强的效果,并且其中一种方法可以修改或补充另一种方法。行为主义者认识到认知偏差和情感偏差在个人决策过程中的重要性,从而提出了更为全面的模型和方法。在认识论方面,《金融学》中的大多数研究都基于实证主义范式、客观性以及因果关系。此外,对传统金融学和行为金融学科学文献的分析表明,研究人员必须了解不同的认识论和方法论观点,以便开展严谨有效的研究:认识论、方法论、管理科学、传统金融学、行为金融学:B40, G10, G40
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COMPETITION LEVEL ANALYSIS FOR THE FINTECH SECTOR IN TURKIYE COMPARED TO GERMANY THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RECOMMENDATIONS ON INDIVIDUAL INVESTOR DECISIONS GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN IMPLICATIONS FOR FOOD INDUSTRY MAIN FACTORS AFFECTING THE FINANCIAL STRUCTURE OF ENTERPRISES EXPLORING THE SUSTAINABLE FUTURE OF E-COMMERCE COMPANIES THROUGH A DIGITAL MARKETING AND LOGISTICS CONTEXT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1