Yohaann A Ghosh, Hai Xin, D S Abdullah Al Maruf, Kai Cheng, Innes Wise, Chris Burrows, Ruta Gupta, Veronica Ka-Yan Cheung, James Wykes, David Leinkram, Catriona Froggatt, Will Lewin, Hedi V Kruse, Eva Tomaskovic-Crook, David R McKenzie, Jeremy Crook, Jonathan R Clark
{"title":"Novel Sheep Model to Assess Critical-Sized Bone Regeneration with Periosteum for <i>In Vivo</i> Bioreactors.","authors":"Yohaann A Ghosh, Hai Xin, D S Abdullah Al Maruf, Kai Cheng, Innes Wise, Chris Burrows, Ruta Gupta, Veronica Ka-Yan Cheung, James Wykes, David Leinkram, Catriona Froggatt, Will Lewin, Hedi V Kruse, Eva Tomaskovic-Crook, David R McKenzie, Jeremy Crook, Jonathan R Clark","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEC.2023.0345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Considerable research is being undertaken to develop novel biomaterials-based approaches for surgical reconstruction of bone defects. This extends to three-dimensional (3D) printed materials that provide stable, structural, and functional support <i>in vivo</i>. However, few preclinical models can simulate <i>in vivo</i> human biological conditions for clinically relevant testing. In this study we describe a novel ovine model that allows evaluation of <i>in vivo</i> osteogenesis via contact with bone and/or periosteum interfaced with printed polymer bioreactors loaded with biomaterial bone substitutes. The infraspinous scapular region of 14 Dorset cross sheep was exposed. Vascularized periosteum was elevated either attached to the infraspinatus muscle or separately. In both cases, the periosteum was supplied by the periosteal branch of the circumflex scapular vessels. In eight sheep, a 3D printed 4-chambered polyetheretherketone bioreactor was wrapped circumferentially in vascularized periosteum. In 6 sheep, 12 double-sided 3D printed 2-chambered polyetherketone bioreactors were secured to the underlying bone allowing direct contact with the bone on one side and periosteum on the other. Our model enabled simultaneous testing of up to 24 (12 double-sided) 10 × 10 × 5 mm bioreactors per scapula in the flat contact approach or a single 40 × 10 mm four-chambered bioreactor per scapula using the periosteal wrap. <i>De novo</i> bone growth was evaluated using histological and radiological analysis. Of importance, the experimental model was well tolerated by the animals and provides a versatile approach for comparing the osteogenic potential of cambium on the bone surface and elevated with periosteum. Furthermore, the periosteal flaps were sufficiently large for encasing bioreactors containing biomaterial bone substitutes for applications such as segmental mandibular reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":23154,"journal":{"name":"Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods","volume":" ","pages":"159-169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2023.0345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Considerable research is being undertaken to develop novel biomaterials-based approaches for surgical reconstruction of bone defects. This extends to three-dimensional (3D) printed materials that provide stable, structural, and functional support in vivo. However, few preclinical models can simulate in vivo human biological conditions for clinically relevant testing. In this study we describe a novel ovine model that allows evaluation of in vivo osteogenesis via contact with bone and/or periosteum interfaced with printed polymer bioreactors loaded with biomaterial bone substitutes. The infraspinous scapular region of 14 Dorset cross sheep was exposed. Vascularized periosteum was elevated either attached to the infraspinatus muscle or separately. In both cases, the periosteum was supplied by the periosteal branch of the circumflex scapular vessels. In eight sheep, a 3D printed 4-chambered polyetheretherketone bioreactor was wrapped circumferentially in vascularized periosteum. In 6 sheep, 12 double-sided 3D printed 2-chambered polyetherketone bioreactors were secured to the underlying bone allowing direct contact with the bone on one side and periosteum on the other. Our model enabled simultaneous testing of up to 24 (12 double-sided) 10 × 10 × 5 mm bioreactors per scapula in the flat contact approach or a single 40 × 10 mm four-chambered bioreactor per scapula using the periosteal wrap. De novo bone growth was evaluated using histological and radiological analysis. Of importance, the experimental model was well tolerated by the animals and provides a versatile approach for comparing the osteogenic potential of cambium on the bone surface and elevated with periosteum. Furthermore, the periosteal flaps were sufficiently large for encasing bioreactors containing biomaterial bone substitutes for applications such as segmental mandibular reconstruction.
目前正在进行大量研究,以开发基于生物材料的新型骨缺损手术重建方法。这延伸到可在体内提供稳定、结构和功能支持的 3D 打印材料。然而,很少有临床前模型能模拟体内人体生物条件进行临床相关测试。在这里,我们描述了一种新型绵羊模型,该模型可通过与装有生物材料骨替代物的打印聚合物生物反应器接口的骨和/或骨膜接触来评估体内成骨情况。14 只多塞特杂交绵羊的肩胛下区被暴露出来。将血管化骨膜与冈下肌相连或单独抬高。在这两种情况下,骨膜都由肩胛周血管的骨膜支供应。在八只绵羊身上,用血管化的骨膜环绕包裹一个 3D 打印的四腔聚醚醚酮(PEEK)生物反应器。在六只绵羊身上,12 个双面 3D 打印的 2 腔聚醚醚酮(PEK)生物反应器被固定在下层骨骼上,一侧与骨骼直接接触,另一侧与骨膜直接接触。我们的模型可同时测试每个肩胛骨上多达 24 个(12 个双面)10 x 10 x 5 毫米的生物反应器(采用平面接触法),或每个肩胛骨上一个 40 x 10 毫米的四腔生物反应器(采用骨膜包裹法)。通过组织学和放射学分析评估了新生骨的生长情况。重要的是,该实验模型对动物的耐受性良好,为比较骨表面的骨膜和骨膜隆起的骨生成潜力提供了一种通用方法。此外,骨膜瓣足够大,可以包裹含有生物材料骨替代物的生物反应器,用于下颌骨节段重建等应用。
期刊介绍:
Tissue Engineering is the preeminent, biomedical journal advancing the field with cutting-edge research and applications that repair or regenerate portions or whole tissues. This multidisciplinary journal brings together the principles of engineering and life sciences in the creation of artificial tissues and regenerative medicine. Tissue Engineering is divided into three parts, providing a central forum for groundbreaking scientific research and developments of clinical applications from leading experts in the field that will enable the functional replacement of tissues.
Tissue Engineering Methods (Part C) presents innovative tools and assays in scaffold development, stem cells and biologically active molecules to advance the field and to support clinical translation. Part C publishes monthly.