Implementation and validation of 2-D-array based tests in routine linac quality assurance

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.zemedi.2024.01.006
Jiří Valenta, Manfred Schmidt, Christoph Bert
{"title":"Implementation and validation of 2-D-array based tests in routine linac quality assurance","authors":"Jiří Valenta,&nbsp;Manfred Schmidt,&nbsp;Christoph Bert","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2024.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>In medical linac quality assurance (QA), to replace film dosimetry with low-resolution 2-D ionization chamber array measurements, to validate the procedures, and to perform a comprehensive sensitivity analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 2-D ionization chamber array with a spatial resolution of 7.62 mm was deployed to perform the following tests: Junction tests, MLC transmission test, beam profile constancy vs. gantry angle test, beam profile constancy vs. low dose delivery test, and beam energy constancy vs. low dose delivery test. Test validation and sensitivity analyses based on short- and long-term statistics of the test results were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All selected mechanical and dosimetry tests could be successfully performed with a 2-D array. Considering the tolerance limits recommended by the AAPM Task Group 142 report (2009), sensitivities of 99.0% or better and specificities ranging from 99.5% to 99.9% could be achieved in all tests when the proper metrics were chosen.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results showed that a low-resolution 2-D ionization chamber array could replace film dosimetry without having to sacrifice high test sensitivity. Its implementation in the routine clinical linac QA program may involve considerable QA time savings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 270-281"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388924000229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In medical linac quality assurance (QA), to replace film dosimetry with low-resolution 2-D ionization chamber array measurements, to validate the procedures, and to perform a comprehensive sensitivity analysis.

Methods

A 2-D ionization chamber array with a spatial resolution of 7.62 mm was deployed to perform the following tests: Junction tests, MLC transmission test, beam profile constancy vs. gantry angle test, beam profile constancy vs. low dose delivery test, and beam energy constancy vs. low dose delivery test. Test validation and sensitivity analyses based on short- and long-term statistics of the test results were performed.

Results

All selected mechanical and dosimetry tests could be successfully performed with a 2-D array. Considering the tolerance limits recommended by the AAPM Task Group 142 report (2009), sensitivities of 99.0% or better and specificities ranging from 99.5% to 99.9% could be achieved in all tests when the proper metrics were chosen.

Conclusions

The results showed that a low-resolution 2-D ionization chamber array could replace film dosimetry without having to sacrifice high test sensitivity. Its implementation in the routine clinical linac QA program may involve considerable QA time savings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在常规直列加速器质量保证中实施和验证基于二维阵列的测试。
目的:在医用直列加速器质量保证(QA)中,用低分辨率二维电离室阵列测量取代胶片剂量测定,验证程序,并进行全面的灵敏度分析:方法:使用空间分辨率为 7.62 毫米的二维电离室阵列进行以下测试:方法:部署了一个空间分辨率为 7.62 毫米的二维电离室阵列,进行了以下测试:结点测试、MLC 传输测试、光束剖面恒定性与龙门架角度测试、光束剖面恒定性与低剂量传输测试,以及光束能量恒定性与低剂量传输测试。根据测试结果的短期和长期统计数据,进行了测试验证和敏感性分析:结果:所有选定的机械和剂量测定测试都能通过二维阵列成功完成。考虑到 AAPM 第 142 工作组报告(2009 年)建议的容差限制,如果选择了适当的指标,所有测试的灵敏度都能达到 99.0% 或更高,特异度从 99.5% 到 99.9% 不等:结果表明,低分辨率二维电离室阵列可以取代胶片剂量测定,而无需牺牲高测试灵敏度。将其应用于常规临床直列加速器质量保证计划可能会大大节省质量保证时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik (Journal of Medical Physics) is an official organ of the German and Austrian Society of Medical Physic and the Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics.The Journal is a platform for basic research and practical applications of physical procedures in medical diagnostics and therapy. The articles are reviewed following international standards of peer reviewing. Focuses of the articles are: -Biophysical methods in radiation therapy and nuclear medicine -Dosimetry and radiation protection -Radiological diagnostics and quality assurance -Modern imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography -Ultrasonography diagnostics, application of laser and UV rays -Electronic processing of biosignals -Artificial intelligence and machine learning in medical physics In the Journal, the latest scientific insights find their expression in the form of original articles, reviews, technical communications, and information for the clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Outside Front Cover Editorial Board Contents Monte Carlo calculations of target fragments from helium and carbon ion interactions with water Large-field irradiation techniques in Germany: A DGMP Working Group survey on the current clinical implementation of total body irradiation, total skin irradiation and craniospinal irradiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1