Xuemei Tang, Hongmei Yuan, Xurong Mu, Peng Gu, Pengfei Kong
{"title":"Endosonography Elastography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Restaging and Response Assessment of Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy.","authors":"Xuemei Tang, Hongmei Yuan, Xurong Mu, Peng Gu, Pengfei Kong","doi":"10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The objective of this academic research is to assess the efficacy of conventional endorectal ultrasound (ERUS), ultrasonic shear wave elastography (SWE), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in evaluating the impact of neoadjuvant therapy (nCRT). Forty-five patients with advanced low rectal cancer (T ≥ 3) were included. Before and after nCRT, ERUS, SWE, and MRI evaluations were conducted. The T staging of ultrasound (uT) and MRI (mT) were evaluated and compared with the pathological T staging (ypT). The accuracy of the 2 diagnostic methods for T staging, and T downstaging was evaluated. The ultrasound elasticity difference and relative elasticity before and after treatment and pathological T downstaging were compared, and its cutoff value and the area under the curve were assessed. In terms of T staging accuracy after chemoradiotherapy, the values for ERUS, ERUS combined with SWE, and MRI were 64.4%, 71.1%, and 62.2%, respectively. No significant difference was observed among these groups ( P > 0.05). The accuracy of uT downstaging was 84.4%, and that of mT downstaging was 88.9%. The receiver operating characteristic curve of uLD and elastic differences and relative elasticity of T downstaging after treatment were 0.754, 0.817, and 0.886, respectively (all P < 0.05). Both ERUS and MRI can evaluate ypT downstaging. The indicators for evaluating T downstaging are uLD, elasticity difference, and relative elasticity, providing more reference for clinical assessment of nCRT efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49116,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000676","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: The objective of this academic research is to assess the efficacy of conventional endorectal ultrasound (ERUS), ultrasonic shear wave elastography (SWE), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in evaluating the impact of neoadjuvant therapy (nCRT). Forty-five patients with advanced low rectal cancer (T ≥ 3) were included. Before and after nCRT, ERUS, SWE, and MRI evaluations were conducted. The T staging of ultrasound (uT) and MRI (mT) were evaluated and compared with the pathological T staging (ypT). The accuracy of the 2 diagnostic methods for T staging, and T downstaging was evaluated. The ultrasound elasticity difference and relative elasticity before and after treatment and pathological T downstaging were compared, and its cutoff value and the area under the curve were assessed. In terms of T staging accuracy after chemoradiotherapy, the values for ERUS, ERUS combined with SWE, and MRI were 64.4%, 71.1%, and 62.2%, respectively. No significant difference was observed among these groups ( P > 0.05). The accuracy of uT downstaging was 84.4%, and that of mT downstaging was 88.9%. The receiver operating characteristic curve of uLD and elastic differences and relative elasticity of T downstaging after treatment were 0.754, 0.817, and 0.886, respectively (all P < 0.05). Both ERUS and MRI can evaluate ypT downstaging. The indicators for evaluating T downstaging are uLD, elasticity difference, and relative elasticity, providing more reference for clinical assessment of nCRT efficacy.
摘要:本学术研究旨在评估传统肛门直肠内超声(ERUS)、超声剪切波弹性成像(SWE)和磁共振成像(MRI)技术在评估新辅助治疗(nCRT)影响方面的功效。研究纳入了 45 例晚期低位直肠癌(T ≥ 3)患者。在新辅助治疗前后,对患者进行了ERUS、SWE和MRI评估。对超声(uT)和磁共振成像(mT)的T分期进行了评估,并与病理T分期(ypT)进行了比较。评估了这两种诊断方法在 T 分期和 T 降期方面的准确性。比较了治疗前后的超声弹性差异和相对弹性,并评估了其临界值和曲线下面积。在化疗放疗后的T分期准确性方面,ERUS、ERUS联合SWE和MRI的数值分别为64.4%、71.1%和62.2%。各组间无明显差异(P>0.05)。uT下分期的准确率为84.4%,mT下分期的准确率为88.9%。治疗后uLD和T下分期的弹性差异和相对弹性的接收者操作特征曲线分别为0.754、0.817和0.886(P均<0.05)。ERUS和MRI均可评估ypT降期。uLD、弹性差和相对弹性是评价T分期的指标,为临床评估nCRT疗效提供了更多参考。
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound Quarterly provides coverage of the newest, most sophisticated ultrasound techniques as well as in-depth analysis of important developments in this dynamic field. The journal publishes reviews of a wide variety of topics including trans-vaginal ultrasonography, detection of fetal anomalies, color Doppler flow imaging, pediatric ultrasonography, and breast sonography.
Official Journal of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound