IPV survivors' and service providers' perspectives on brain injury screening/evaluation process and impact.

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1080/09602011.2024.2314873
Shireen S Rajaram, Peggy Reisher, Matthew Garlinghouse, Kathy S Chiou
{"title":"IPV survivors' and service providers' perspectives on brain injury screening/evaluation process and impact.","authors":"Shireen S Rajaram, Peggy Reisher, Matthew Garlinghouse, Kathy S Chiou","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2024.2314873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the perspectives of intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors and staff of brain injury (BI) screening, and the neuropsychological evaluation (NPE) process. We gathered qualitative data from 17 participants - 10 IPV survivors, at risk for a BI, who had received BI screening and a NPE and a total of 7 staff in IPV-serving organizations. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed for key themes using thematic analysis. Survivors were over 18 years of age; the majority were between 19 and 45 years old, unemployed, unmarried, and had children. Survivors were angry, scared, and embarrassed to learn that they might have an IPV-related BI. They were thankful to have an explanation for some of their cognitive symptoms, which disrupted their daily activities, social relationships, and overall quality of life. Staff were pleased to be able to provide valuable information to their clients that could have a positive impact on their wellbeing. Overall, screening for a BI and participation in the NPE were well tolerated by IPV survivors with a possible BI. Inclusion of the perspectives of IPV survivors and support staff is an essential first step to better understanding their needs so interventions can be developed to aid their recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2024.2314873","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the perspectives of intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors and staff of brain injury (BI) screening, and the neuropsychological evaluation (NPE) process. We gathered qualitative data from 17 participants - 10 IPV survivors, at risk for a BI, who had received BI screening and a NPE and a total of 7 staff in IPV-serving organizations. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed for key themes using thematic analysis. Survivors were over 18 years of age; the majority were between 19 and 45 years old, unemployed, unmarried, and had children. Survivors were angry, scared, and embarrassed to learn that they might have an IPV-related BI. They were thankful to have an explanation for some of their cognitive symptoms, which disrupted their daily activities, social relationships, and overall quality of life. Staff were pleased to be able to provide valuable information to their clients that could have a positive impact on their wellbeing. Overall, screening for a BI and participation in the NPE were well tolerated by IPV survivors with a possible BI. Inclusion of the perspectives of IPV survivors and support staff is an essential first step to better understanding their needs so interventions can be developed to aid their recovery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IPV 幸存者和服务提供者对脑损伤筛查/评估过程和影响的看法。
本研究探讨了亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)幸存者和工作人员对脑损伤(BI)筛查和神经心理评估(NPE)过程的看法。我们收集了 17 名参与者的定性数据,其中包括 10 名有脑损伤风险、接受过脑损伤筛查和神经心理评估的亲密伴侣暴力幸存者,以及 7 名亲密伴侣暴力服务机构的工作人员。我们对访谈进行了录音和逐字记录,并使用主题分析法对关键主题进行了分析。幸存者的年龄均在 18 岁以上;大多数在 19 至 45 岁之间,失业,未婚,有子女。得知自己可能患有与 IPV 相关的 BI 时,幸存者感到愤怒、害怕和尴尬。他们很庆幸自己的一些认知症状得到了解释,这些症状扰乱了他们的日常活动、社会关系和整体生活质量。工作人员很高兴能为客户提供有价值的信息,从而对他们的健康产生积极影响。总体而言,IPV 幸存者对 BI 筛查和参与 NPE 的耐受性良好。将 IPV 幸存者和支持人员的观点纳入其中,是更好地了解他们的需求从而制定干预措施帮助他们康复的重要第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
期刊最新文献
Effect of stimulation-driven attention in virtual reality balloon search training of patients with left unilateral spatial neglect after stroke: A randomized crossover study. Augmented action observation: Theory and practical applications in sensorimotor rehabilitation. Fatigue in young patients with acquired brain injury in the outpatient rehabilitation setting: A 2-year follow-up study. Family caregivers' sense-making of the results of functional neurodiagnostics for patients with Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness. IPV survivors' and service providers' perspectives on brain injury screening/evaluation process and impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1