Perspectives of Certified Nurse-Midwives and Physicians on the Structural and Institutional Barriers that Contribute to the Reproductive Inequities of Black Birthing People in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Tamara J Nelson, Brittany D Chambers Butcher, Ana Delgado, Monica R McLemore
{"title":"Perspectives of Certified Nurse-Midwives and Physicians on the Structural and Institutional Barriers that Contribute to the Reproductive Inequities of Black Birthing People in the San Francisco Bay Area.","authors":"Tamara J Nelson, Brittany D Chambers Butcher, Ana Delgado, Monica R McLemore","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Black birthing people in the United States disproportionately endure inequitable experiences and outcomes during pregnancy and childbirth via structural, interpersonal, and obstetric racism. In this study, the researchers explore provider perspectives of how racism is perpetuated in institutional perinatal and reproductive health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Critical Race Theory, Reproductive Justice, and midwifery theory were operationalized through secondary thematic analysis of existing qualitative data from the Community Racial Equity and Training Interventions and Evaluation of Current and Future Healthcare Clinicians Study. Twenty-four perinatal providers (certified nurse-midwives [n = 7] and physicians [n = 17]) voluntarily participated in interviews. A comparative approach was used to determine how professional identity and model of care influence physicians' and certified nurse-midwives' perceptions of equity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis produced 5 themes: racism as a comorbidity, health care systems' inability to address the needs of Black birthing people, health care systems prioritizing providers over patients are failed systems, patients are the experts in the optimal health care model, and benefits of interprofessional teams grounded in Reproductive Justice. Additionally, both physicians and midwives expressed a need for a new care model.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>With these findings, our team proposes a modification of the midwifery model for application by all provider types that could radically shift the experience and outcomes of perinatal and reproductive health care and reduce mortality. Using a human rights approach to care, a Reproductive Justice-Public Health Critical Race praxis-informed midwifery model may be operationalized by all perinatal and reproductive health care providers. This novel model reflects an iterative process that may offer institutions and providers methods to build on past research supporting midwifery-centered care for improving outcomes for all patients by specifically focusing on improving care of Black birthing people. The implications of this work offer broad application in current clinical practice, quality improvement, research, technology, and patient resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Black birthing people in the United States disproportionately endure inequitable experiences and outcomes during pregnancy and childbirth via structural, interpersonal, and obstetric racism. In this study, the researchers explore provider perspectives of how racism is perpetuated in institutional perinatal and reproductive health care.

Methods: Critical Race Theory, Reproductive Justice, and midwifery theory were operationalized through secondary thematic analysis of existing qualitative data from the Community Racial Equity and Training Interventions and Evaluation of Current and Future Healthcare Clinicians Study. Twenty-four perinatal providers (certified nurse-midwives [n = 7] and physicians [n = 17]) voluntarily participated in interviews. A comparative approach was used to determine how professional identity and model of care influence physicians' and certified nurse-midwives' perceptions of equity.

Results: Thematic analysis produced 5 themes: racism as a comorbidity, health care systems' inability to address the needs of Black birthing people, health care systems prioritizing providers over patients are failed systems, patients are the experts in the optimal health care model, and benefits of interprofessional teams grounded in Reproductive Justice. Additionally, both physicians and midwives expressed a need for a new care model.

Discussion: With these findings, our team proposes a modification of the midwifery model for application by all provider types that could radically shift the experience and outcomes of perinatal and reproductive health care and reduce mortality. Using a human rights approach to care, a Reproductive Justice-Public Health Critical Race praxis-informed midwifery model may be operationalized by all perinatal and reproductive health care providers. This novel model reflects an iterative process that may offer institutions and providers methods to build on past research supporting midwifery-centered care for improving outcomes for all patients by specifically focusing on improving care of Black birthing people. The implications of this work offer broad application in current clinical practice, quality improvement, research, technology, and patient resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注册助产士和医生对造成旧金山湾区黑人生育不平等的结构性和制度性障碍的看法。
导言:在美国,由于结构性、人际关系和产科方面的种族主义,黑人分娩者在怀孕和分娩期间承受了过多不公平的经历和结果。在本研究中,研究人员探讨了医疗服务提供者对种族主义如何在机构围产期和生殖健康护理中长期存在的看法:研究方法:通过对 "社区种族平等和培训干预以及当前和未来医疗保健临床医生评估研究 "中的现有定性数据进行二次专题分析,将批判性种族理论、生殖正义和助产理论具体化。24 名围产期医疗服务提供者(注册助产士 [n = 7] 和医生 [n = 17])自愿参加了访谈。采用比较法确定专业身份和护理模式如何影响医生和注册助产士对公平的看法:专题分析产生了 5 个主题:种族主义是一种并发症、医疗保健系统无法满足黑人分娩者的需求、医疗保健系统将提供者置于患者之上是失败的系统、患者是最佳医疗保健模式中的专家,以及以生殖正义为基础的跨专业团队的益处。此外,医生和助产士都表示需要一种新的医疗模式:讨论:根据上述研究结果,我们的团队提出了一种助产士模式的修改方案,供所有类型的医疗服务提供者使用,该方案可从根本上改变围产期和生殖健康护理的体验和结果,并降低死亡率。利用人权护理方法,所有围产期和生殖健康服务提供者都可以操作以生殖正义-公共卫生关键种族实践为基础的助产模式。这种新颖的模式反映了一个迭代过程,可为医疗机构和医疗服务提供者提供方法,在过去支持以助产为中心的护理的研究基础上,通过特别关注改善对黑人分娩者的护理来改善所有患者的治疗效果。这项工作的意义可广泛应用于当前的临床实践、质量改进、研究、技术和患者资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preventing Vertical Transmission of Chagas Disease: An Emerging Public Health Issue in Perinatal Care. Thirty Years of Midwifery Education in the Rural and Diverse State of New Mexico. Antepartum Preparation and Consent for Intrapartum Events: An Ethical Gap. Midwifery Students' Experiences of Bias in the Clinical Setting: Prevalence, Types, and Impact. Innovations in Preconception Care: Optimizing Health for All Individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1