Changes in benign prostatic hyperplasia management in Valencia: a real-world evidence analysis

J. Navarro-Pérez , E. López Alcina , J. Calabiug Pérez , F. Brotons Muntó , A. Martínez , L. Vallejo , J. Jiménez
{"title":"Changes in benign prostatic hyperplasia management in Valencia: a real-world evidence analysis","authors":"J. Navarro-Pérez ,&nbsp;E. López Alcina ,&nbsp;J. Calabiug Pérez ,&nbsp;F. Brotons Muntó ,&nbsp;A. Martínez ,&nbsp;L. Vallejo ,&nbsp;J. Jiménez","doi":"10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>A training program was developed to increase general practitioners' engagement in the optimal management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). The goal of this study was to evaluate changes in BPH management after the implementation of a training program.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>This observational retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2019 and 2020. Aggregated data were analyzed in three evaluation periods (2010, 2012 and 2015), addressing quality indicators for diagnosis, treatment, and treatment outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 118 795 patients who presented any data points were included. All quality indicators (number of IPSS and PSA determinations) increased between the first period and the last. Combination (α-blocker + 5-ARI) therapy was increasingly prescribed during the study periods whereas the proportion of prescriptions for single-agent α-blocker showed no significant differences among the periods analyzed. However, the total number of patients eligible for combination therapy who actually received this treatment was low in all periods (7.5%, 17.9%, and 20.1%, in 2010, 2012, and 2015, respectively). The outcome indicators revealed a decrease in referrals to the urology unit mostly among newly diagnosed patients. Even though the proportion of patients who underwent BPH-related surgeries increased significantly from the first to the second period, the number of surgeries remained stable between the second and third periods.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The training program had a generally positive impact on the management of BPH patients in PC, but the overall study period may be insufficient to show an effect on some outcome indicators such as the number of surgeries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94291,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 6","pages":"Pages 461-469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S217357862400012X/pdfft?md5=5bb6724dbd3f730048623cade5545887&pid=1-s2.0-S217357862400012X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S217357862400012X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

A training program was developed to increase general practitioners' engagement in the optimal management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). The goal of this study was to evaluate changes in BPH management after the implementation of a training program.

Material and Methods

This observational retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2019 and 2020. Aggregated data were analyzed in three evaluation periods (2010, 2012 and 2015), addressing quality indicators for diagnosis, treatment, and treatment outcomes.

Results

Overall, 118 795 patients who presented any data points were included. All quality indicators (number of IPSS and PSA determinations) increased between the first period and the last. Combination (α-blocker + 5-ARI) therapy was increasingly prescribed during the study periods whereas the proportion of prescriptions for single-agent α-blocker showed no significant differences among the periods analyzed. However, the total number of patients eligible for combination therapy who actually received this treatment was low in all periods (7.5%, 17.9%, and 20.1%, in 2010, 2012, and 2015, respectively). The outcome indicators revealed a decrease in referrals to the urology unit mostly among newly diagnosed patients. Even though the proportion of patients who underwent BPH-related surgeries increased significantly from the first to the second period, the number of surgeries remained stable between the second and third periods.

Conclusions

The training program had a generally positive impact on the management of BPH patients in PC, but the overall study period may be insufficient to show an effect on some outcome indicators such as the number of surgeries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴伦西亚良性前列腺增生管理的变化:真实世界证据分析。
简介和目标:为提高全科医生对良性前列腺增生症(BPH)最佳治疗的参与度,我们制定了一项培训计划。本研究旨在评估培训计划实施后良性前列腺增生症管理的变化:这项观察性回顾性队列研究于 2019 年至 2020 年间进行。针对诊断、治疗和治疗结果的质量指标,对三个评估期(2010 年、2012 年和 2015 年)的汇总数据进行了分析:总共纳入了 118 795 名提供任何数据点的患者。所有质量指标(IPSS和PSA测定次数)在第一个评估期和最后一个评估期之间都有所增加。在研究期间,联合(α-受体阻滞剂+5-ARI)疗法的处方量越来越多,而单药α-受体阻滞剂的处方比例在分析期间没有显著差异。然而,在所有研究期间,符合联合治疗条件并实际接受该治疗的患者总人数较少(2010 年、2012 年和 2015 年分别为 7.5%、17.9% 和 20.1%)。结果指标显示,转诊到泌尿科的患者有所减少,其中大部分是新确诊的患者。尽管接受良性前列腺增生相关手术的患者比例从第一期到第二期显著增加,但手术数量在第二期和第三期之间保持稳定:培训计划总体上对 PC 中良性前列腺增生症患者的管理产生了积极影响,但整个研究期间可能不足以显示对某些结果指标(如手术次数)的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What is the relationship between penile cancer and the microbiome? A scoping review Cumulative morbidity of ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma Recommendations on the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: Patient selection Consensus update on the therapeutic approach to patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity Quality of life following transobturator sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1