Diagnostic accuracy of patch testing based in clinical response to contact allergen restrictions in allergic contact dermatitis.

J Sánchez, L Álvarez, S Die, J Miquel-Miquel, M Velásquez
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of patch testing based in clinical response to contact allergen restrictions in allergic contact dermatitis.","authors":"J Sánchez, L Álvarez, S Die, J Miquel-Miquel, M Velásquez","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Patch testing (PT) is used to identify substances that cause allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). However, the clinical effects of allergen restrictions following PT have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of PT in patients suspected of having ACD. <b>Methods.</b> Prospective study. PT were performed in patients with clinical diagnosis of ACD. Patients with a positive PT (case group) had a strict restriction of the suspected substance for one month. In patients with negative patch testing (control group), allergen restriction was based in clinical history. Clinical reduction (CR) of at least 50% in disease activity (CR50%) after one month of allergen restriction was considered clinically relevant. Total control was defined as clinical reduction of at least 90% (CR90%). <b>Results.</b> From 400 patients, 66.2% had a positive PT. The sensitivity of PT to identify CR50% was 84%, specificity 47%, PPV 53%, and NPV 81%. Only 10.5% of patients achieved CR90%. <b>Conclusions.</b> The PT had moderate diagnostic accuracy. It could be useful as a screening, but a positive result should be confirmed with controlled allergen restriction. The low number of patients who achieved a 90% CR invites to reconsider the allergens included in PT and the mechanistic processes of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Background. Patch testing (PT) is used to identify substances that cause allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). However, the clinical effects of allergen restrictions following PT have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of PT in patients suspected of having ACD. Methods. Prospective study. PT were performed in patients with clinical diagnosis of ACD. Patients with a positive PT (case group) had a strict restriction of the suspected substance for one month. In patients with negative patch testing (control group), allergen restriction was based in clinical history. Clinical reduction (CR) of at least 50% in disease activity (CR50%) after one month of allergen restriction was considered clinically relevant. Total control was defined as clinical reduction of at least 90% (CR90%). Results. From 400 patients, 66.2% had a positive PT. The sensitivity of PT to identify CR50% was 84%, specificity 47%, PPV 53%, and NPV 81%. Only 10.5% of patients achieved CR90%. Conclusions. The PT had moderate diagnostic accuracy. It could be useful as a screening, but a positive result should be confirmed with controlled allergen restriction. The low number of patients who achieved a 90% CR invites to reconsider the allergens included in PT and the mechanistic processes of the disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据过敏性接触性皮炎患者对接触过敏原限制的临床反应进行斑贴测试的诊断准确性。
摘要:背景。斑贴试验(PT)用于确定导致过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)的物质。然而,对过敏原限制后的临床效果尚未进行深入研究。本研究旨在评估贴片测试对疑似 ACD 患者的诊断准确性。方法:前瞻性研究。前瞻性研究。对临床诊断为 ACD 的患者进行 PT 检查。PT阳性的患者(病例组)在一个月内严格禁用可疑物质。斑贴试验阴性的患者(对照组)则根据临床病史限制使用过敏原。在限制过敏原一个月后,疾病活动的临床缓解(CR)至少达到 50%(CR50%)即为临床相关性。完全控制的定义是临床活动至少减少 90% (CR90%)。结果在 400 名患者中,66.2% 的患者 PT 呈阳性。PT 鉴定 CR50% 的灵敏度为 84%,特异性为 47%,PPV 为 53%,NPV 为 81%。只有 10.5% 的患者达到 CR90%。结论。PT 具有中等诊断准确性。它可作为筛查手段,但阳性结果应通过控制过敏原限制来确认。达到 90% CR 值的患者人数较少,这就需要重新考虑 PT 所包含的过敏原和疾病的机理过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊最新文献
A narrative review on allergy and exposure to domestic and non-domestic animals: favorable and unfavorable effects. An overview of hidden food allergens: need for change to the priority food allergen lists? Cost-effective allergy screening: a retrospective observational study. Efficacy and tolerability of house dust mites subcutaneous immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid: an Italian multicenter study. Different clinical phenotypes in common variable immunodeficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1