The effect of informative video before the procedure on anxiety levels in patients who will have ureteral stent removal under local anesthesia

O. Can , M. Bozkurt , E. Danış , E. Taha Keskin , E. Kandemir , H. Lutfi Canat
{"title":"The effect of informative video before the procedure on anxiety levels in patients who will have ureteral stent removal under local anesthesia","authors":"O. Can ,&nbsp;M. Bozkurt ,&nbsp;E. Danış ,&nbsp;E. Taha Keskin ,&nbsp;E. Kandemir ,&nbsp;H. Lutfi Canat","doi":"10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.02.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our objective was to assess the impact of video-animated information on the anxiety levels of patients undergoing ureteral stent removal under local anesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The study was designed as a randomized prospective trial. The one group received only verbal and written information before the surgery, while the other group received video-animated information in addition to the written and verbal instructions. The patients’ anxiety levels were assessed using the STAI-S and STAI-T questionnaires, while their pain scores were evaluated using VAS scores. Tolerability and satisfaction scores were also evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The video-group (Group 1) consisted of 74 patients, while the non-video group (Group 2) consisted of 82 patients. The mean pre-information STAI-T score was 34.4 ± 3.7 in Group 1 and 35.2 ± 3 in the Group 2 (p = 0.113). In the video group, pre-information STAI-S scores was 34.8 ± 3.3 and post-information STAI-S scores was 33.8 ± 3 (p &lt; 0.001). In the non-video group, pre-information STAI-S score was 35.6 ± 2.6 and post-information STAI-S score was 35.5 ± 2.7 (p = 0.260). The mean VAS score of Group 1 is 5.7 ± 1.2 and Group 2 is 5.7 ± 1.4 (p = 0.608). The mean tolerability scores of Group 1 and Group 2 were 3.7 ± 0.9 and 2.7 ± 1, respectively. The mean satisfaction scores of Group 1 and Group 2 were 4.1 ± 0.9 and 2.6 ± 1, respectively. Both tolerability score and satisfaction score improved statistically significantly after video information (p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Providing video-animated information in addition to written and verbal information before removing the ureteral stent reduces patients’ preoperative anxiety. Furthermore, patient tolerance and satisfaction are higher when informative videos are included.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94291,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 5","pages":"Pages 377-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173578624000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Our objective was to assess the impact of video-animated information on the anxiety levels of patients undergoing ureteral stent removal under local anesthesia.

Method

The study was designed as a randomized prospective trial. The one group received only verbal and written information before the surgery, while the other group received video-animated information in addition to the written and verbal instructions. The patients’ anxiety levels were assessed using the STAI-S and STAI-T questionnaires, while their pain scores were evaluated using VAS scores. Tolerability and satisfaction scores were also evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale.

Results

The video-group (Group 1) consisted of 74 patients, while the non-video group (Group 2) consisted of 82 patients. The mean pre-information STAI-T score was 34.4 ± 3.7 in Group 1 and 35.2 ± 3 in the Group 2 (p = 0.113). In the video group, pre-information STAI-S scores was 34.8 ± 3.3 and post-information STAI-S scores was 33.8 ± 3 (p < 0.001). In the non-video group, pre-information STAI-S score was 35.6 ± 2.6 and post-information STAI-S score was 35.5 ± 2.7 (p = 0.260). The mean VAS score of Group 1 is 5.7 ± 1.2 and Group 2 is 5.7 ± 1.4 (p = 0.608). The mean tolerability scores of Group 1 and Group 2 were 3.7 ± 0.9 and 2.7 ± 1, respectively. The mean satisfaction scores of Group 1 and Group 2 were 4.1 ± 0.9 and 2.6 ± 1, respectively. Both tolerability score and satisfaction score improved statistically significantly after video information (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Providing video-animated information in addition to written and verbal information before removing the ureteral stent reduces patients’ preoperative anxiety. Furthermore, patient tolerance and satisfaction are higher when informative videos are included.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在局部麻醉下进行输尿管支架移除手术前播放信息视频对患者焦虑水平的影响。
目的我们的目的是评估视频动画信息对在局部麻醉下进行输尿管支架移除手术的患者焦虑水平的影响:研究设计为随机前瞻性试验。方法:研究设计为随机前瞻性试验,一组患者在术前仅接受口头和书面指导,另一组患者除接受书面和口头指导外,还接受视频动画指导。使用 STAI-S 和 STAI-T 问卷评估患者的焦虑水平,使用 VAS 评分评估患者的疼痛评分。患者的耐受性和满意度也采用 5 点李克特量表进行评估:视频组(第 1 组)有 74 名患者,非视频组(第 2 组)有 82 名患者。第一组患者在告知前的平均 STAI-T 得分为 34.4 ± 3.7,第二组为 35.2 ± 3(P = 0.113)。在视频组中,告知前的 STAI-S 得分为(34.8 ± 3.3),告知后的 STAI-S 得分为(33.8 ± 3)(p 结论:在视频组中,告知前的 STAI-S 得分为(34.8 ± 3.3),告知后的 STAI-S 得分为(33.8 ± 3):在拔除输尿管支架前,除了提供书面和口头信息外,还提供视频动画信息可降低患者的术前焦虑。此外,如果包含信息视频,患者的耐受性和满意度会更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What is the relationship between penile cancer and the microbiome? A scoping review Cumulative morbidity of ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma Recommendations on the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: Patient selection Consensus update on the therapeutic approach to patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity Quality of life following transobturator sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1