How and why pet cats are fed the way they are: a self-reported owner survey.

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1177/1098612X231209894
Conor O'Halloran, Petra Cerna, Rachel Barnicoat, Sarah Ma Caney, Danièlle A Gunn-Moore
{"title":"How and why pet cats are fed the way they are: a self-reported owner survey.","authors":"Conor O'Halloran, Petra Cerna, Rachel Barnicoat, Sarah Ma Caney, Danièlle A Gunn-Moore","doi":"10.1177/1098612X231209894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study used an owner-directed online questionnaire to collect data regarding their food and water provision for their pet cats. The survey was conducted in 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The anonymous online 30-question survey was available via vetprofessionals.com.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1172 cat owners fully completed the questionnaire. The respondents each owned a median of two cats (range 1-6). They reported being most strongly motivated to feed a particular ration because of palatability, observed and/or expected health benefits, or that the diet was/is perceived as 'natural'. The majority of owners (n = 946, 80.7%) fed their cats exclusively a commercially purchased complete wet food, dry kibble diet or mixture of both. Compared with a previous (unpublished) survey conducted by the same authors in 2013,1 there were substantial increases in the number of owners feeding therapeutic diets (26.6% vs 0.7%) and the inclusion of raw meat in cats' rations (15.6% vs 3.7%). The proportion of respondents providing at least one feeding station per cat was 83.1%, with significant use of enrichment feeding methods (29.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Veterinarians need to be aware of changing trends in cat feeding to provide owners with appropriate support. Veterinary advice was frequently sought by owners and can be used as an opportunity to improve cat health and welfare, particularly in multi-cat households, but was not often influential to client decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":15851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","volume":"26 2","pages":"1098612X231209894"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10911312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X231209894","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study used an owner-directed online questionnaire to collect data regarding their food and water provision for their pet cats. The survey was conducted in 2019.

Methods: The anonymous online 30-question survey was available via vetprofessionals.com.

Results: A total of 1172 cat owners fully completed the questionnaire. The respondents each owned a median of two cats (range 1-6). They reported being most strongly motivated to feed a particular ration because of palatability, observed and/or expected health benefits, or that the diet was/is perceived as 'natural'. The majority of owners (n = 946, 80.7%) fed their cats exclusively a commercially purchased complete wet food, dry kibble diet or mixture of both. Compared with a previous (unpublished) survey conducted by the same authors in 2013,1 there were substantial increases in the number of owners feeding therapeutic diets (26.6% vs 0.7%) and the inclusion of raw meat in cats' rations (15.6% vs 3.7%). The proportion of respondents providing at least one feeding station per cat was 83.1%, with significant use of enrichment feeding methods (29.1%).

Conclusions and relevance: Veterinarians need to be aware of changing trends in cat feeding to provide owners with appropriate support. Veterinary advice was frequently sought by owners and can be used as an opportunity to improve cat health and welfare, particularly in multi-cat households, but was not often influential to client decision making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宠物猫的喂养方式和原因:主人自述调查。
研究目的本研究使用由主人指导的在线问卷,收集有关为宠物猫提供食物和水的数据。调查于 2019 年进行:匿名在线调查包含 30 个问题,可通过 vetprofessionals.com 获得:共有 1172 名猫主人完整填写了问卷。每位受访者养猫数量的中位数为两只(1-6 只不等)。他们表示,饲喂某种特定饲料的最强烈动机是考虑其适口性、观察到的和/或预期的健康益处,或者该饲料是/被认为是 "天然 "的。大多数饲主(n = 946,80.7%)只给猫咪喂食市售的全脂湿粮、干狗粮或两者的混合物。与同一作者在 2013 年进行的上一次调查(未发表)1 相比,喂食食疗饮食(26.6% 对 0.7%)和在猫咪口粮中添加生肉(15.6% 对 3.7%)的主人数量大幅增加。为每只猫提供至少一个喂食站的受访者比例为 83.1%,大量使用强化喂食方法(29.1%):兽医需要了解猫咪喂养的变化趋势,以便为猫主人提供适当的支持。猫主人经常会寻求兽医的建议,兽医的建议可作为改善猫咪健康和福利的契机,尤其是在多猫家庭中,但兽医的建议并不经常影响客户的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
254
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: JFMS is an international, peer-reviewed journal aimed at both practitioners and researchers with an interest in the clinical veterinary healthcare of domestic cats. The journal is published monthly in two formats: ‘Classic’ editions containing high-quality original papers on all aspects of feline medicine and surgery, including basic research relevant to clinical practice; and dedicated ‘Clinical Practice’ editions primarily containing opinionated review articles providing state-of-the-art information for feline clinicians, along with other relevant articles such as consensus guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Doxycycline with or without famciclovir for infectious ophthalmic and respiratory disease: a prospective, randomized, masked, placebo-controlled trial in 373 kittens. Evaluation of cats treated with robenacoxib after gastrointestinal surgery. Serological and molecular detection of Toxoplasma gondii in cats in Europe with evaluation of associated risk factors for pathogen contact/infection. Nasopharyngeal stenosis in cats: a retrospective study of 21 cases comparing endoscopic and surgical treatment (2018-2022). Risk factors affecting all-cause mortality in cats hospitalized by a referral soft tissue service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1