Shahariar Mohammed Fahim, Salisa C Westrick, Jingjing Qian, Surachat Ngorsuraches, Courtney S Watts Alexander, Kimberly Braxton Lloyd, Natalie S Hohmann
{"title":"A survey on awareness, knowledge and preferences toward genetic testing among the United States general public.","authors":"Shahariar Mohammed Fahim, Salisa C Westrick, Jingjing Qian, Surachat Ngorsuraches, Courtney S Watts Alexander, Kimberly Braxton Lloyd, Natalie S Hohmann","doi":"10.2217/pme-2023-0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To understand awareness, knowledge and preferences regarding genetic testing among the USA general public. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional online survey using a Qualtrics Panel. <b>Results:</b> Among 1600 respondents, 545 (34%) were White, 411 (26%) Black, 412 (26%) Hispanic or Latin(x) and 232 (15%) Asian. Most had heard of ancestry testing (87%) and genetic health risk testing (69%), but a third thought inherited genes were only a little or not at all responsible for obesity (36%) and mental health (33%). The majority preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing (n = 74%) compared with reactive testing. Statistically significant differences between racial/ethnic groups and rural-urban respondents were observed. <b>Conclusion:</b> Most preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing; however, about one-quarter preferred reactive testing. Preferences should be discussed during patient-clinician interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94167,"journal":{"name":"Personalized medicine","volume":" ","pages":"117-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2023-0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To understand awareness, knowledge and preferences regarding genetic testing among the USA general public. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey using a Qualtrics Panel. Results: Among 1600 respondents, 545 (34%) were White, 411 (26%) Black, 412 (26%) Hispanic or Latin(x) and 232 (15%) Asian. Most had heard of ancestry testing (87%) and genetic health risk testing (69%), but a third thought inherited genes were only a little or not at all responsible for obesity (36%) and mental health (33%). The majority preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing (n = 74%) compared with reactive testing. Statistically significant differences between racial/ethnic groups and rural-urban respondents were observed. Conclusion: Most preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing; however, about one-quarter preferred reactive testing. Preferences should be discussed during patient-clinician interactions.