Over with carbon? Investors’ reaction to the Paris Agreement and the US withdrawal

IF 6.1 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Financial Stability Pub Date : 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101232
Lucia Alessi , Stefano Battiston , Virmantas Kvedaras
{"title":"Over with carbon? Investors’ reaction to the Paris Agreement and the US withdrawal","authors":"Lucia Alessi ,&nbsp;Stefano Battiston ,&nbsp;Virmantas Kvedaras","doi":"10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>How financial investors may react to policy events related to sustainability and climate change mitigation in particular, is a key question with implications for sustainable finance and financial stability. We address this question by carrying out a multi-period difference-in-difference approach on a confidential database of securities holdings of the European Central Bank, and we provide evidence of several effects related to the Paris Agreement. In aggregate, investors reduced their participation in the equities of high-carbon firms in response to the agreement, and the trend reverted after the US’s announcement of withdrawal from the agreement. However, the reaction varies across categories and geographies of the securities holders, their ownership size, and the emissions of owned firms. In particular, transition risk has been taken up by less regulated financial institutions and the BRIC countries. Our results highlight that the redirection of global financial flows towards climate action requires clear and unanimous signals from the global community of policy makers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Stability","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 101232"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572308924000172/pdfft?md5=4a821dc41f462f0663674b05b6c5fc30&pid=1-s2.0-S1572308924000172-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Stability","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572308924000172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How financial investors may react to policy events related to sustainability and climate change mitigation in particular, is a key question with implications for sustainable finance and financial stability. We address this question by carrying out a multi-period difference-in-difference approach on a confidential database of securities holdings of the European Central Bank, and we provide evidence of several effects related to the Paris Agreement. In aggregate, investors reduced their participation in the equities of high-carbon firms in response to the agreement, and the trend reverted after the US’s announcement of withdrawal from the agreement. However, the reaction varies across categories and geographies of the securities holders, their ownership size, and the emissions of owned firms. In particular, transition risk has been taken up by less regulated financial institutions and the BRIC countries. Our results highlight that the redirection of global financial flows towards climate action requires clear and unanimous signals from the global community of policy makers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳排放结束了?投资者对《巴黎协定》和美国退出的反应
金融投资者如何对与可持续发展,特别是减缓气候变化有关的政策事件做出反应,是一个对可持续金融和金融稳定有影响的关键问题。为了解决这个问题,我们在欧洲中央银行证券持有量的机密数据库中采用了多期差分法,并提供了与《巴黎协定》相关的几种效应的证据。从总体上看,投资者减少了对高碳企业股票的参与,以应对该协议,而这一趋势在美国宣布退出该协议后有所恢复。然而,不同类别和地域的证券持有者、其所有权规模以及所持企业的排放量不同,反应也不尽相同。特别是,监管较少的金融机构和金砖四国承担了过渡风险。我们的研究结果突出表明,要将全球资金流转向气候行动,需要全球决策者发出明确一致的信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Stability provides an international forum for rigorous theoretical and empirical macro and micro economic and financial analysis of the causes, management, resolution and preventions of financial crises, including banking, securities market, payments and currency crises. The primary focus is on applied research that would be useful in affecting public policy with respect to financial stability. Thus, the Journal seeks to promote interaction among researchers, policy-makers and practitioners to identify potential risks to financial stability and develop means for preventing, mitigating or managing these risks both within and across countries.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Banks, freedom, and political connections: New evidence from around the world Political governance and firm performance in China: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment Lending standards and output growth Bank lending to fossil fuel firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1