Experimental determination of reference intensity ratio essential for accurate thickness measurement of HfO2 ultrathin films by XPS

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1002/sia.7293
Lulu Zhang, Yasushi Azuma, Akira Kurokawa, Hiroyuki Matsuzaki
{"title":"Experimental determination of reference intensity ratio essential for accurate thickness measurement of HfO2 ultrathin films by XPS","authors":"Lulu Zhang, Yasushi Azuma, Akira Kurokawa, Hiroyuki Matsuzaki","doi":"10.1002/sia.7293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When measuring the thickness of ultrathin overlayer films using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), accurate values of the reference intensity ratio (<i>R</i><sub>0</sub>) and the effective attenuation length (<i>L</i>) are essential. By definition, <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> is the peak intensity ratio for an overlayer and the substrate in “bulk” phases. Two issues need to be addressed in experimental determining <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> for ultrathin films: (i) How might a contamination layer on the sample used for measuring peak intensities impact <i>R</i><sub>0</sub>? And (ii) do differences in the structure or chemistry of an ultrathin film make it inappropriate to determine <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> using bulk forms of the overlayer? In this study, we demonstrate the experimental determination of the <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> for an ultrathin HfO<sub>2</sub> film on a Si(100) substrate with a 2 nm SiO<sub>2</sub> layer. The values of <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> were determined using (i) the bulk materials of the HfO<sub>2</sub> film and substrate and (ii) the ultrathin HfO<sub>2</sub> films after different cleaning treatments. The results show that the <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> determined by the ultrathin films is higher than that determined by the bulk materials. Also, keeping the same level of carbonaceous contamination on the sample surface by cleaning as much as possible is essential for an accurate experimental determination of <i>R</i><sub>0</sub>. In addition, the effective attenuation length was obtained using samples with known thicknesses measured by X-ray reflectometry. The thicknesses and uncertainty budget of the ultrathin HfO<sub>2</sub> films were then evaluated.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.7293","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When measuring the thickness of ultrathin overlayer films using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), accurate values of the reference intensity ratio (R0) and the effective attenuation length (L) are essential. By definition, R0 is the peak intensity ratio for an overlayer and the substrate in “bulk” phases. Two issues need to be addressed in experimental determining R0 for ultrathin films: (i) How might a contamination layer on the sample used for measuring peak intensities impact R0? And (ii) do differences in the structure or chemistry of an ultrathin film make it inappropriate to determine R0 using bulk forms of the overlayer? In this study, we demonstrate the experimental determination of the R0 for an ultrathin HfO2 film on a Si(100) substrate with a 2 nm SiO2 layer. The values of R0 were determined using (i) the bulk materials of the HfO2 film and substrate and (ii) the ultrathin HfO2 films after different cleaning treatments. The results show that the R0 determined by the ultrathin films is higher than that determined by the bulk materials. Also, keeping the same level of carbonaceous contamination on the sample surface by cleaning as much as possible is essential for an accurate experimental determination of R0. In addition, the effective attenuation length was obtained using samples with known thicknesses measured by X-ray reflectometry. The thicknesses and uncertainty budget of the ultrathin HfO2 films were then evaluated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过 XPS 准确测量 HfO2 超薄薄膜厚度所必需的参考强度比的实验测定
使用 X 射线光电子能谱(XPS)测量超薄叠层薄膜的厚度时,参考强度比(R0)和有效衰减长度(L)的精确值至关重要。根据定义,R0 是 "体 "相中叠层和基底的峰值强度比。在实验确定超薄薄膜的 R0 时需要解决两个问题:(i) 用于测量峰值强度的样品上的污染层会如何影响 R0?(ii) 超薄薄膜结构或化学性质的差异是否会导致不适合使用叠层的块状形式来确定 R0?在本研究中,我们演示了如何通过实验测定硅(100)基底上带有 2 nm SiO2 层的超薄 HfO2 薄膜的 R0。R0 值是通过 (i) HfO2 薄膜和基底的块状材料和 (ii) 经过不同清洁处理后的超薄 HfO2 薄膜测定的。结果表明,超薄薄膜测定的 R0 值高于块状材料测定的 R0 值。同时,通过清洁尽可能保持样品表面碳质污染水平不变对于准确测定 R0 至关重要。此外,有效衰减长度是通过 X 射线反射仪测量已知厚度的样品获得的。然后评估了超薄二氧化铪薄膜的厚度和不确定性预算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1